Abstract
Understanding of the natural history of separation of the inner surface of the intact prepuce from the glans is paramount to the care of the uncircumcised penis. As emphasized by the authors, all too often, the child (and over anxious parent) is referred to specialists by even the most knowledgeable medical practitioner for circumcision due to inability to retract, residual adhesions, infection of cyst (almost always smegma). In Western countries like the USA, where historically circumcision has been the norm, educating the families about this natural process of prepucial separation right from birth, and essentially reassuring them that time and a hands-off approach for the foreskin is all that is necessary in the long run, should be reinforced. Whether families and referring physicians will concur, is conjecture.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Martin RD. Primate origins and evolution: a phylogenetic reconstruction. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1990. p. 42–3.
Altemus AR, Hutchins GM. Development of the human anterior urethra. J Urol. 1991;146:1085–93.
Deibert GA. The separation of the prepuce in the human penis. Anat Rec. 1933;57:387.
Glenister TW. A consideration of the process involved in the development of the prepuce in man. Br J Urol. 1956;28:243–9.
Gairdner D. The fate of the foreskin. BMJ. 1949;2:1433–7.
Ashfield JE, Nickel KR, Siemens DR, MacNeily AE, Nickel JC. Treatment of phimosis with topical steroids in 194 children. J Urol. 2003;169(3):1106–8.
Monsour MA, Rabinovitch HH, Dean GE. Medical management of phimosis in children: our experience with topical steroids. J Urol. 1999;162:1162–4.
Oster J. Further fate of the foreskin. Arch Dis Child. 1968;43:200–3.
Escala JM, Rickwood AM. Balanitis. Br J Urol. 1989;63:196–7.
Fornasa CV, Calabro A, Miglietta A, et al. Mild balanoposthitis. Genitourin Med. 1994;70:345–6.
Chalmers RJ, Burton PA, Bennett RF, et al. Lichen sclerosus et atrophicus. A common and distinctive cause of phimosis in boys. Arch Dermatol. 1984;120:1025–7.
Rickwood AM, Hemlatah V, Batcup G, Spitz L. Phimosis in boys. Br J Urol. 1980;52:147–50.
Poynter JH, Levy J. Balanoitis xerotica obliterans: effective treatment with topical and sublesional corticosteroids. Br J Urol. 1967;39:420–5.
Fischer Klein C, Rauchenwald M. Triple incision to treat phimosis in children: an alternative to circumcision. BJU Int. 2003;92:462.
Godbole P, MacKinnon AE. Foreskin meatoplasty and injection of triamcinolone for BXO. Abstract presentation, BAPS, Estoril, Portugal; 2002.
Shelley WB, Shelley ED, Grunenwald MA, Anders TJ, Ramnath A. Long term antibiotic therapy for balanitis xerotica obliterans. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1999;40:69–72.
Ratz JL. Carbon dioxide laser treatment of balanitis xerotica obliterans. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1984;10:925–8.
DeVries CR, Miller AK, Packer MG. Reduction of paraphimosis with hyaluronidase. Urology. 1996;48:464–5.
Barone JG, Fleisher MH. Treatment of paraphimosis using the puncture technique. Pediatr Emerg Care. 1993;9:298–9.
Bergeson PS, Hopkin RJ, Bailey Jr RB, et al. The inconspicuous penis. Pediatrics. 1993;92:794–9.
Smeulders N, Wilcox DT, Cuckow PM. The buried penis- an anatomical approach. BJU Int. 2000;86:523–6.
Joseph VT. A new approach to the surgical correction of buried penis. J Pediatr Surg. 1995;30:727–9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Godbole, P.P., Wilcox, D.T. (2012). Care and Conditions of the Uncircumcised Phallus. In: Bolnick, D., Koyle, M., Yosha, A. (eds) Surgical Guide to Circumcision. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2858-8_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2858-8_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-2857-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-2858-8
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)