Abstract
Patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease often undergo exercise stress testing to either diagnose coronary artery disease or to determine functional status or prognosis. Frequently, though, more advanced imaging techniques are combined with the exercise ECG portion and the information obtained from the exercise ECG test is underappreciated. In this chapter, we review the current indications and contraindications of exercise ECG testing, as well as interpretations of exercise ECG testing. We also review how the exercise ECG can aid in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease, and the prognostic implications of a normal or abnormal test result. Finally, as the economic landscape of medicine rapidly changes and more emphasis is being placed on cost-saving, we discuss the cost-effectiveness of exercise ECG testing compared to more advanced stress imaging protocols.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsAbbreviations
- ACIP:
-
Asymptomatic Cardiac Ischemia Pilot
- ACLS:
-
Advanced cardiac life support
- BARI:
-
Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation
- CABG:
-
Coronary artery bypass grafting
- CAD:
-
Coronary artery disease
- CCU:
-
Cardiac care unit
- CPET:
-
Cardiopulmonary exercise testing
- DTS:
-
Duke treadmill score
- ECG:
-
Electrocardiogram
- ETT:
-
Exercise treadmill testing
- HRR:
-
Heart-rate recovery
- LAD:
-
Left anterior descending
- MET:
-
Metabolic equivalents
- MI:
-
Myocardial infarction
- MPI:
-
Myocardial perfusion imaging
- NIH:
-
National Institutes of Health
- PCI:
-
Percutaneous coronary intervention
- PTCA:
-
Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty
- STS:
-
Society of Thoracic Surgeons
- WOMEN:
-
What Is the Optimal Method for Ischemia Evaluation in Women Trial
References
Gibbons RJ, Balady GJ, Bricker JT, Chaitman BR, Fletcher GF, Froelicher VF, et al. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for exercise testing: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Exercise Testing). Washington, DC: American College of Cardiology; 2002.
Chaitman BR. Exercise stress testing. In: Bonow R, Mann DL, Zipes D, Libby P, editors. Braunwald’s 9th edition of heart disease (a textbook of cardiovascular medicine). Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2011. p. 168–99.
Noël M, Jobin J, Marcoux A, Poirier P, Dagenais G, Bogaty P. Comparison of myocardial ischemia on the ergocycle versus the treadmill in patients with coronary heart disease. Am J Cardiol. 2010;105:633–9.
Chan AK, Ilias-Khan NA, Xian H, Inman C, Martin WH. Arm exercise stress perfusion imaging predicts clinical outcome. J Appl Physiol. 2011;111:1546–53.
Porszasz J, Casaburi R, Somfay A, Woodhouse LJ, Whipp B. A treadmill protocol using simultaneous changes in speed and grade. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35:1596–603.
Amsterdam EA, Kirk JD, Bluemke DA, Diercks D, Farkouh ME, Garvey JL, et al. Testing of low-risk patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain. A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2010;122:1756–76.
Azarbal B, Hayes SW, Lewin HC, Hachamovitch R, Cohen I, Berman DS. The incremental prognostic value of percentage of heart rate reserve achieved over myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography in the prediction of cardiac death and all-cause mortality: superiority over 85 % of maximal age-predicted heart rate. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:423–30.
Brubaker PH, Kitzman DW. Chronotropic incompetence. Causes, consequences, and management. Circulation. 2011;123:1010–20.
Gulati M, Shaw LJ, Thisted RA, Black HR, Bairey Merz CN, Arnsdorf MF. Heart rate response to exercise stress testing in asymptomatic women. The St James Women Take Heart Project. Circulation. 2010;122:130–7.
Vivekananthan DP, Blackstone EH, Potheir CE, Lauer MS. Heart rate recovery after exercise is a predictor of mortality, independent of the angiographic severity of coronary disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42:831–8.
Gayda M, Bourassa MG, Tardif JC, Fortier A, Juneau M, Nigam A. Heart rate recovery after exercise and long-term prognosis in patients with coronary artery disease. Can J Cardiol. 2012;28:201–7.
Jolly MA, Brennan DM, Cho L. Impact of exercise on heart rate recovery. Circulation. 2011;124:1520–6.
Rich D, Chen S, Ward RP. Comparison of high risk stress myocardial perfusion imaging findings in men with rapid versus prolonged recovery of ST-segment depression after exercise stress testing. Am J Cardiol. 2010;105:1361–4.
Uthamalingam S, Zheng H, Leavitt M, Pomerantsev E, Ahmado I, Gurm GS, et al. Exercise-induced ST-segment elevation in ECG lead aVR is a useful indicator of significant left main or ostial LAD coronary artery stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2011;4:176–86.
Gianrossi R, Detrano R, Mulvihill D, Lehmann K, Dubach P, Colombo A, et al. Exercise-induced ST depression in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. A meta-analysis. Circulation. 1989;80:87–98.
Froelicher VF, Fearon WF, Ferguson C, Morise AP, Heidenreich P, West J, et al. Lessons learned from studies of the standard exercise ECG test. Chest. 1999;116:1442–51.
Morise AP, Diamond GA. Comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of exercise electrocardiography in biased and unbiased populations of men and women. Am Heart J. 1995;130:741–7.
Myers J, Prakash M, Froelicher V, Do D, Partington S, Atwood JE. Exercise capacity and mortality among men referred for exercise testing. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:793–801.
Marshall AJ, Hutchings F, James AJ, Kelion AD. Prognostic value of a nine-minute treadmill test in patients undergoing myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. Am J Cardiol. 2010;106:1423–8.
Mark DB, Hlatky MA, Harrell FE, Lee KL, Califf RM, Pryor DB. Exercise treadmill score for predicting prognosis in coronary artery disease. Ann Intern Med. 1987;106:793–800.
Mark DB, Shaw L, Harrell FE, Hlatky MA, Lee KL, Bengtson JR, et al. Prognostic value of a treadmill exercise score in outpatients with suspected coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:849–53.
Kwok JMF, Miller TD, Hodge DO, Gibbons RJ. Prognostic value of the Duke treadmill score in the elderly. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:1475–81.
Alexander KP, Shaw LJ, DeLong ER, Mark DB, Peterson ED. Value of exercise treadmill testing in women. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32:1657–64.
Morise AP, Jalisi F. Evaluation of pretest and exercise test scores to assess all-cause mortality in unselected patients presenting for exercise testing with symptoms of suspected coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42:842–50.
Morise AP, Olson MB, Merz CNB, Mankad S, Rogers WJ, Pepine WJ, et al. Validation of the accuracy of pretest and exercise test scores in women with a low prevalence of coronary disease: the NHLBI-sponsored Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) study. Am Heart J. 2004;147:1085–92.
Aktas MK, Ozduran V, Pothier CE, Lang R, Lauer MS. Global risk scores and exercise testing for predicting all-cause mortality in a preventive medicine program. JAMA. 2004;292:1462–8.
Erikssen G, Bodegard J, Bjornholt JV, Liestol K, Thelle DS, Erikssen J. Exercise testing of healthy men in a new perspective: from diagnosis to prognosis. Eur Heart J. 2004;25:978–86.
Gibbons LW, Mitchell TL, Wei M, Blair SN, Cooper KH. Maximal exercise test as a predictor of risk for mortality from coronary heart disease in asymptomatic men. Am J Cardiol. 2000;86:53–8.
Balady GJ, Larson MG, Vasan RS, Leip EP, O’Donnell CJ, Levy D. Usefulness of exercise testing in the prediction of coronary disease risk among asymptomatic persons as a function of the Framingham Risk Score. Circulation. 2004;110:1920–5.
Greenland P, LaBree L, Azen SP, Doherty TM, Detrano RC. Coronary artery calcium score combined with Framingham Score for risk prediction in asymptomatic individuals. JAMA. 2004;291:210–5.
Gulati M, Pandey DK, Arnsdorf MF, Lauderdale DS, Thisted RA, Wicklund RH, et al. Exercise capacity and the risk of death in women. The St James Women Take Heart Project. Circulation. 2003;108:1554–9.
Mora S, Redberg RF, Cui Y, Whiteman MK, Flaws JA, Sharrett AR, et al. Ability of exercise testing to predict cardiovascular and all-cause death in asymptomatic women. A 20-year follow-up of the Lipid Research Clinics Prevalence Study. JAMA. 2003;290:1600–7.
Kotowycz MA, Cosman TL, Tartaglia C, Afzal R, Syal RP, Natarajan MK. Safety and feasibility of early hospital discharge in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction – a prospective and randomized trial in low-risk primary percutaneous coronary intervention patients (the Safe-Depart Trial). Am Heart J. 2010;159:117.e1–6.
Kandzari DE, Tcheng JE, Cohen DJ, Bakhai A, Grines CL, Cox DA, et al. Feasibility and implications of an early discharge strategy after percutaneous intervention with Abciximab in acute myocardial infarction (the CADILLAC Trial). Am J Cardiol. 2003;92:779–84.
Jeremy RW. Early discharge after percutaneous intervention – we can but should we? Heart Lung Circ. 2011;20:351–2.
Newby LK, Eisenstein EL, Califf RM, Thompson TD, Nelson CL, Peterson ED, et al. Cost effectiveness of early discharge after uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:749–55.
Blankstein R, Ahmed W, Bamberg F, Rogers IS, Schlett CL, Nasir K, et al. Comparison of exercise treadmill testing with cardiac computed tomography angiography among patients presenting o the emergency room with chest pain. The Rule Out Myocardial Infarction Using Computer-Assisted Tomography (ROMICAT) Study. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5:233–42.
Gibbons RJ, Hodge DO, Berman DS, Akinboboye OO, Heo J, Hachamovitch R, et al. Long-term outcome of patients with intermediate-risk exercise electrocardiograms who do not have myocardial perfusion defects on radionuclide imaging. Circulation. 1999;100:2140–5.
Dewey FE, Kapoor JR, Williams RS, Lipinski MJ, Ashley EA, Hadley D, et al. Ventricular arrhythmias during clinical treadmill testing and prognosis. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168:225–34.
Engel G, Beckerman JG, Froelicher VF, Yamazaki T, Chen HA, Richardson K, et al. Electrocardiographic arrhythmia risk testing. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2004;29:365–432.
Tan JH, Scheinman MM. Exercise-induced polymorphic ventricular tachycardia in adults without structural heart disease. Am J Cardiol. 2008;101:1142–6.
Morshedi-Meibodi A, Evans JC, Levy D, Larson MG, Vasan RS. Clinical correlates and prognostic significance of exercise-induced ventricular premature beats in the community: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2004;109:2417–22.
Frolkis JP, Pothier CE, Blackstone EH, Lauer MS. Frequent ventricular ectopy after exercise as a predictor of death. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:781–90.
O’Neill JO, Young JB, Pothier CE, Lauer MS. Severe frequent ventricular ectopy after exercise as a predictor of death in patients with heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:820–6.
Bunch TJ, Chadrasekaran K, Gersh BJ, Hammill SC, Hodge DO, Khan AH, et al. The prognostic significance of exercise-induced atrial arrhythmias. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:1236–40.
Jeger RV, Zellweger MJ, Kaiser C. Prognostic value of stress testing in patients over 75 years of age with chronic angina. Chest. 2004;125:1124–31.
Lai S, Kaykha A, Yamazaki T, Goldstein M, Spin JM, Myers J, et al. Treadmill scores in elderly men. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:606–15.
Messinger-Rapport B, Pothier Snader CE, Slbackstone EH, Yu D, Lauer MS. Value of exercise capacity and heart rate recovery in older people. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51:63–8.
Afilalo J, Eisenberg MJ, Morin JF, Bergman H, Monette J, Noiseux N, et al. Gait speed as an incremental predictor of mortality and major morbidity in elderly patients undergoing cardiac surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:1668–76.
Krone RJ, Hardison RM, Chaitman BR, Gibbons RJ, Sopko G, Bach R, et al. Risk stratification after successful coronary revascularization: the lack of a role for routine exercise testing. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38:136–42.
Sellier P, Chatellier G, D’Agrosa-Boiteux MC, Douard H, Dubois C, Goepfert PC, et al. Use of non-invasive cardiac investigations to predict clinical endpoints after coronary bypass graft surgery in coronary artery disease patients: results from the prognosis and evaluation of risk in the coronary operated patient (PERISCOP) study. Eur Heart J. 2003;24:916–26.
Roffi M, Wenaweser P, Windecker S, Mehta H, Eberli FR, Seiler C, et al. Early exercise after coronary stenting is safe. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42:1569–73.
Weisman IM, Beck KC, Casaburi R, Cotes JE, Crapo RO, Dempsey JA, et al. ATS/ACCP statement on cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003;167:211–77.
Corra U, Mezzani A, Bosimini E, Giannuzzi P. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing and prognosis in chronic heart failure: a prognosticating algorithm for the individual patient. Chest. 2004;126:942–50.
Arena R, Sietsema KE. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in the clinical evaluation of patients with heart and lung disease. Circulation. 2011;123:668–80.
Holland DJ, Kumbhani DJ, Ahmed SH, Marwick TH. Effects of treatment on exercise tolerance, cardiac function, and mortality in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57:1676–86.
Lee MS, Finch W, Weisz G, Kirtane AJ. Cardiac allograft vasculopathy. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2011;12:143–52.
Shaw LJ, Mieres JH, Hendel RH, Boden WE, Gulati M, Veledar E, et al. Comparative effectiveness of exercise electrocardiography with or without myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography in women with suspected coronary artery disease. Results from the What Is the Optimal Method for Ischemia Evaluation in Women (WOMEN) Trial. Circulation. 2011;124:1239–49.
Shah BR, Cowper PA, O’Brien SM, Jensen N, Drawz M, Patel MR, et al. Patterns of cardiac stress testing after revascularization in community practice. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:1328–34.
Galper BZ, Moran A, Coxson PG, Pletcher MJ, Heidenreich P, Lazar LD, et al. Using stress testing to guide primary prevention of coronary heart disease among intermediate-risk patients. A cost-effectiveness analysis. Circulation. 2012;125:260–70.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix 1
Appendix 1
The ACC/AHA Classifications I, II, and III Used to Summarize Indications
-
Class I: Conditions for which there is evidence and/or general agreement that a given procedure or treatment is useful and effective.
-
Class II: Conditions for which there is conflicting evidence and/or a divergence of opinion about the usefulness/efficacy of a procedure or treatment.
-
Class IIa: Weight of evidence/opinion is in favor of usefulness/efficacy.
-
Class IIb: Usefulness/efficacy is less well established by evidence/ opinion.
-
Class III: Conditions for which there is evidence and/or general agreement that the procedure/treatment is not useful/effective and in some cases may be harmful.
Exercise Testing to Diagnose Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease
-
Class I: Adult patients (including those with complete right bundle-branch block or less than 1 mm or resting ST depression) with an intermediate pretest probability of CAD on the basis of gender, age, and symptoms (specific exceptions are noted under Classes II and III below).
-
Class IIa: Patients with vasospastic angina.
-
Class IIb:
-
1.
Patients with a high pretest probability of CAD by age, symptoms, and gender.
-
2.
Patients with a low pretest probability of CAD by age, symptoms, and gender.
-
3.
Patients with <1 mm of baseline ST depression and taking digoxin.
-
4.
Patients with electrocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and <1 mm of baseline ST depression.
-
1.
-
Class III:
-
1.
Patients with the following baseline ECG abnormalities:
-
Pre-excitation (Wolff-Parkinson-White) syndrome
-
Electronically paced ventricular rhythm
-
>1 mm of resting ST depression
-
Complete left bundle branch block
-
-
2.
Patients with a documented myocardial infarction or prior coronary angiography demonstrating significant disease have an established diagnosis of CAD; however, ischemia and risk can be determined by testing (see sections III and IV).
-
1.
Risk Assessment and Prognosis in Patients with Symptoms or a Prior History of CAD
-
Class I:
-
1.
Patients undergoing initial evaluation with suspected or known CAD including those with complete right bundle-branch block or <1 mm of resting ST depression. Specific exceptions are noted below in Class IIb
-
2.
Patients with suspected or known CAD, previously evaluated, presenting with significant change in clinical status.
-
3.
Low-risk unstable angina patients 8–12 h after presentation who have been free of active ischemic or heart failure symptoms (Level of Evidence: B).
-
4.
Intermediate-risk unstable angina patients 203 days after presentation who have been free of active ischemic or heart failure symptoms (Level of Evidence: B)
-
1.
-
Class IIa: Intermediate-risk unstable angina patients who have initial cardiac markers that are normal, a repeat ECG without significant change, and cardiac markers 6–12 h after the onset of symptoms that are normal and no other evidence of ischemia during observation (Level of Evidence: B).
-
Class IIb:
-
1.
Patients with the following resting ECG abnormalities:
-
Pre-excitation (Wolff-Parkinson-White) syndrome
-
Electronically paced ventricular rhythm
-
1 mm or more of resting ST depression
-
Complete left bundle-branch block or any interventricular conduction defect with a QRS duration >120 ms
-
-
2.
Patients with a stable clinical course who undergo periodic monitoring to guide treatment.
-
1.
-
Class III:
-
1.
Patients with severe comorbidity likely to limit life expectancy and/or candidacy for revascularization.
-
2.
High-risk unstable angina patients (Level of Evidence: C).
-
1.
After Myocardial Infarction
-
Class I:
-
1.
Before discharge for prognostic assessment, activity prescription, evaluation of medical therapy (submaximal at about 4–6 days).*
-
2.
Early after discharge for prognostic assessment, activity prescription, evaluation of medical therapy, and cardiac rehabilitation if the predischarge exercise test was not done (symptoms limited; about 14–21 days).*
-
3.
Late after discharge for prognostic assessment, activity prescription, evaluation of medical therapy, and cardiac rehabilitation if the early exercise test was submaximal (symptom limited; about 3–6 weeks).*
-
1.
-
Class IIa: After discharge for activity counseling and/or exercise training as part of cardiac rehabilitation in patients who have undergone coronary revascularization.
-
Class IIb:
-
1.
Patients with the following ECG abnormalities:
-
Complete left bundle-branch block
-
Pre-excitation syndrome
-
LVH
-
Digoxin therapy
-
>1 mm of resting ST-segment depression
-
Electronically paced ventricular rhythm
-
-
2.
Periodic monitoring in patients who continue to participate in exercise training or cardiac rehabilitation.
-
1.
-
Class III:
-
1.
Severe comorbidity likely to limit life expectancy and/or candidacy for revascularization.
-
2.
At any time to evaluate patients with acute myocardial infarction who have uncompensated congestive heart failure, cardiac arrhythmia, or noncardiac conditions that severely limit their ability to exercise (Level of Evidence: C).
-
3.
Before discharge to evaluate patients who have already been selected for, or have undergone, cardiac catheterization. Although a stress test may be useful before or after catheterization to evaluate or identify ischemia in the distribution of a coronary lesion of borderline severity, stress imaging tests are recommended (Level of Evidence: C).
*Exceptions are noted under Classes IIb and III.
-
1.
Exercise Testing with Ventilatory Gas Analysis
-
Class I:
-
1.
Evaluation of exercise capacity and response to therapy in patients with heart failure who are being considered for heart transplantation.
-
2.
Assistance in the differentiation of cardiac versus pulmonary limitations as a cause of exercise-induced dyspnea or impaired exercise capacity when the cause is uncertain.
-
1.
-
Class IIa: Evaluation of exercise capacity when indicated for medical reasons in patients in whom the estimates of exercise capacity from exercise test time or work rate are unreliable.
-
Class IIb:
-
1.
Evaluation of the patient’s response to specific therapeutic interventions in which improvement of exercise tolerance is an important goal or end point.
-
2.
Determination of the intensity for exercise training as part of comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation.
-
1.
-
Class III: Routine use to evaluate exercise capacity.
Special Groups: Women, Asymptomatic Individuals, and Post Revascularization Patients
Exercise Testing in Asymptomatic Persons Without Known CAD
-
Class I: None
-
Class IIa: Evaluation of asymptomatic persons with diabetes mellitus who plan to start vigorous exercise (Level of Evidence: C).
-
Class IIb:
-
1.
Evaluation of persons with multiple risk factors as a guide to risk- reduction therapy.*
-
2.
Evaluation of asymptomatic men older than 45 years and women older than 55 years:
-
Who plan to start vigorous exercise (especially if sedentary) or
-
Who are involved in occupations in which impairment might impact public safety or who are at high risk for CAD due to other diseases (e.g. peripheral vascular disease and chronic renal failure).
-
-
1.
-
Class III: Routine screening of asymptomatic men or women.
*Multiple risk factors are defined as hypercholesterolemia (>240 mg/dL), hypertension (systolic blood pressure >140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure >90 mmHg), smoking, diabetes, and family history of heart attack or sudden cardiac death in a first-degree relative younger than 60 years. An alternative approach might be to select patients with a Framingham risk score consistent with at least a moderate risk of serious cardiac events within 5 years.
Valvular Heart Disease
-
Class I: In chronic aortic regurgitation, assessment of functional capacity and symptomatic responses in patients with a history of equivocal symptoms.
-
Class IIa:
-
1.
In chronic aortic regurgitation, evaluation of symptoms and functional capacity before participation in athletic activities.
-
2.
In chronic aortic regurgitation, prognostic assessment before aortic valve replacement in asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic patients with left ventricular dysfunction.
-
1.
-
Class IIb: Evaluation of exercise capacity in patients with valvular heart disease.
-
Comprehensive discussion is found in the ACC/AHA valvular heart disease guidelines.
-
Class III: Diagnosis of CAD in patients with moderate to severe valvular disease or with the following baseline ECG abnormalities:
-
Pre-excitation
-
Electronically paced ventricular rhythm
-
>1 mm ST depression
-
Complete left bundle-branch block
-
Exercise Testing Before and After Revascularization
-
Class I:
-
1.
Demonstration of ischemia before revascularization.
-
2.
Evaluation of patients with recurrent symptoms that suggest ischemia after revascularization.
-
1.
-
Class IIa: After discharge for activity counseling and/or exercise training as part of cardiac rehabilitation in patients who have undergone coronary revascularization.
-
Class IIb:
-
1.
Detection of restenosis in selected, high-risk asymptomatic patients within the first 12 months after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
-
2.
Periodic monitoring of selected, high-risk asymptomatic patients for restenosis, graft occlusion, incomplete coronary revascularization, or disease progression.
-
1.
-
Class III:
-
1.
Localization of ischemia for determining the site of intervention
-
2.
Routine, periodic monitoring of asymptomatic patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting without specific indications.
-
1.
Investigation of Heart Rhythm Disorders
-
Class I:
-
1.
Identification of appropriate settings in patients with rate-adaptive pacemakers.
-
2.
Evaluation of congenital complete heart block in patients considering increased physical activity or participation in competitive sports (Level of Evidence: C).
-
1.
-
Class IIa:
-
1.
Evaluation of patients with known or suspected exercise-induced arrhythmias.
-
2.
Evaluation of medical, surgical, or ablative therapy in patients with exercise-induced arrhythmias (including atrial fibrillation).
-
1.
-
Class IIb:
-
1.
Investigation of isolated ventricular ectopic beats in middle-aged patients without other evidence of CAD.
-
2.
Investigation of prolonged first-degree atrioventricular block or type I second-degree Wenckebach, left bundle-branch block, right bundle-branch block, or isolated ectopic beats in young patients considering participation in competitive sports (Level of Evidence: C).
-
1.
-
Class III: Routine investigation of isolated ectopic beats in young patients.
Adapted Gibbons et al. [1].
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Laddu, A.A., Alderson, L., Chaitman, B.R. (2015). Exercise Testing. In: Willerson, J., Holmes, Jr., D. (eds) Coronary Artery Disease. Cardiovascular Medicine. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2828-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2828-1_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-2827-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-2828-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)