Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Role of Registers in Occupational Cancer Control

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Occupational Cancers

  • 1130 Accesses

Abstract

During the twentieth century, register data have become increasingly important for the identification and quantification of occupational cancer risks and thereby for occupational cancer control. Registers can provide non-differential information on occupation, exposure, death, disease, and a number of potential confounders, for cohorts, cases, and reference groups. National registers of high quality may secure completeness, representativity, and independent data, which may help to reduce bias in risk estimates. The Nordic countries are known for population and disease registers of high quality, available for statistical purposes and studies based on linkage. Worldwide, the last decades have shown a tendency toward more emphasis on protection of personal data (autonomy), which has been seen to hamper the establishment of new registers and the conduct of epidemiologic research. For further improvement of health care and cancer control, the best of register data needs to be combined with improved information on exposure and with additional data from biological specimens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ramazzini B. De morbis artificum [diseases of workers]. 2nd ed. Padova: Archi-Lycæo; 1703. p. 156. [In Latin] http://archive.org/stream/bernramazzinide00porzgoog#page/n160/mode/1up. Accessed 17 Nov 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Labrèche F, Goldberg MS, Weiderpass E. Chapter 27. Breast cancer. In: Anttila S, Boffetta P, Straif K, editors. Occupational cancer. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fraumeni Jr JF, Lloyd JW, Smith EM, Wagoner JK. Cancer mortality among nuns: role of marital status in etiology of neoplastic disease in women. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1969;42(3):455–68.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pukkala E, Martinsen JI, Lynge E, et al. Occupation and cancer – follow-up of 15 million people in five Nordic countries. Acta Oncol. 2009;48(5):646–790.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Whitehead M. William Farr’s legacy to the study of inequalities in health. Bull World Health Organ. 2000;78(1):86–7.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL, editors. Modern epidemiology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008. p. 1–851.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Doll R. Part III: 7th Walter Hubert lecture. Pott and the prospects for prevention. Br J Cancer. 1975;32(2):263–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Doll R. Nickel exposure: a human health hazard. IARC Sci Publ. 1984;53:3–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Morgan JG. Some observations on the incidence of respiratory cancer in nickel workers. Br J Ind Med. 1958;15(4):224–34.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Doll R. Cancer of the lung and nose in nickel workers. Br J Ind Med. 1958;15(4):217–23.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. European Union Carcinogens Directive (2004/37/EC). https://osha.europa.eu/en/legislation/directives/exposure-to-chemical-agents-and-chemical-safety/osh-directives/directive-2004-37-ec-indicative-occupational-exposure-limit-values. Accessed 17 Nov 2012.

  12. Kauppinen T, Saalo A, Pukkala E, Virtanen S, Karjalainen A, Vuorela R. Evaluation of a national register on occupational exposure to carcinogens: effectiveness in the prevention of occupational cancer, and cancer risks among the exposed workers. Ann Occup Hyg. 2007;51(5):463–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Danish Working Environment Authority. Executive order on measures to protect workers from the risks related to exposure to carcinogenic substances and materials at work. Copenhagen: Danish Working Environment Authority; 2005. https://arbejdstilsynet.dk/en/engelsk/regulations/executive-orders/908-kraeftrisiko-stoffer-og-materialer.aspx. Accessed 17 Nov 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Arbetsmiljöverket [Work Environment Authority]. Chemical hazards in the working environment (provisions and general recommendations). Stockholm: Arbetsmiljöverket; 2011. http://www.av.se/dokument/inenglish/legislations/eng1119.pdf. Accessed 16 Nov 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Arbeidstilsynet [Norwegian Labour Inspection]. Kjemikalier [chemicals]. Oslo: Arbeidstilsynet; 2012. [In Norwegian] http://www.arbeidstilsynet.no/fakta.html?tid=206422#Arbeidstakerregister. Accessed 16 Nov 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Safe work Australia. Occupational disease indicators. http://www.safeworkaustralia.gov.au/sites/SWA/about/Publications/Documents/724/Occupational-Disease-Indicators-report-2012.pdf. Accessed 16 Nov 2012.

  17. Cancer care Ontario. Occupational cancer is the leading cause of work-related fatalities in Ontario. Ontario Cancer Facts, Special Issue. 2012. https://www.cancercare.on.ca/cms/one.aspx?portalId=1377&pageId=129578; https://www.cancercare.on.ca/common/pages/UserFile.aspx?fileId=129585. Accessed 17 Nov 2012.

  18. Teschke K, Barroetavena MC. Occupational cancer in Canada: what do we know? CMAJ. 1992;147(10):1501–7.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Scarselli A, Scano P, Marinaccio A, Iavicoli S. Occupational cancer in Italy: evaluating the extent of compensated cases in the period 1994–2006. Am J Ind Med. 2009;52(11):859–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gisquet E, Chamming’s S, Pairon JC, Gilg Soit Ilg A, Imbernon E, Goldberg M. The determinants of under-reporting occupational diseases. The case of mesothelioma. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2011;59(6):393–400.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hansen J, Rasmussen TR, Omland Ø, Olsen JH, Danish National Board of Industrial Injuries. Registration of selected cases of occupational cancer (1994–2002) with the Danish National Board of Industrial Injuries. Ugeskr Laeger. 2007;169(18):1674–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wergeland E, Bjerkedal T, Andersen A, Mowé G. Use of occupational disease benefits. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1997;117(2):211–6 [in Norwegian].

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Cancer in Norway 2010. Oslo: Cancer Registry of Norway; 2012. p. 92. http://www.kreftregisteret.no/no/Generelt/Nyheter/Cancer-in-Norway-2010/. Accessed 10 Oct 2012.

  24. Teschke K, Olshan AF, Daniels JL, et al. Occupational exposure assessment in case-control studies: opportunities for improvement. Occup Environ Med. 2002;59(9):575–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wagner G. History of cancer registration. In: Jensen OM, Parkin DM, MacLennan R, Muir CS, Skeet RG, editors. Cancer registration: principles and methods. IARC Scientific Publication No. 95. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 1991. p. 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Engholm G, Ferlay J, Christensen N, et al. NORDCAN – a Nordic tool for cancer information, planning, quality control and research. Acta Oncol. 2010;49(5):725–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lund EM, Clemmesen IH, Storm HH. Survey of Nordic cancer registries. In: ANCR, editor. Survey of Nordic cancer registries. Copenhagen: Danish Cancer Society; 2000. p. 7–18. http://www.ancr.nu/survey.asp. Accessed 17 Nov 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Luo J, Adami HO, Reilly M, Ekbom A, Nordenvall C, Ye W. Interpreting trends of pancreatic cancer incidence and mortality: a nation-wide study in Sweden (1960–2003). Cancer Causes Control. 2008;19(1):89–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Siemiatycki J, Gérin M, Richardson L, Hubert J, Kemper H. Preliminary report of an exposure-based, case-control monitoring system for discovering occupational carcinogens. Teratog Carcinog Mutagen. 1982;2(2):169–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Vida S, Pintos J, Parent ME, Lavoué J, Siemiatycki J. Occupational exposure to silica and lung cancer: pooled analysis of two case-control studies in Montreal, Canada. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2010;19(6):1602–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Hayes RB, Yin SN, Dosemeci M, et al. Benzene and the dose-related incidence of hematologic neoplasms in China. Chinese Academy of Preventive Medicine–National Cancer Institute Benzene Study Group. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997;89(14):1065–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Rushton L, Hutchings SJ, Fortunato L, et al. Occupational cancer burden in Great Britain. Br J Cancer. 2012;107 Suppl 1:S3–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Redfern P. Which countries will follow the Scandinavian lead in taking a register-based census of population? J Off Stat. 1986;2(4):415–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Peto J. Cancer epidemiology in the last century and the next decade. Nature. 2001;411(6835):390–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Lynge E. Implication for epidemiology of disease registers. Public Health Rev. 1993–1994;21(3–4):263–70.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Hansson MG. Need for a wider view of autonomy in epidemiological research. BMJ. 2010;340:c2335.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Bray F, Parkin DM. Evaluation of data quality in the cancer registry: principles and methods. Part I: comparability, validity and timeliness. Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(5):747–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Parkin DM, Bray F. Evaluation of data quality in the cancer registry: principles and methods Part II. Completeness. Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(5):756–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Haldorsen T, Andersen A, Boffetta P. Smoking-adjusted incidence of lung cancer by occupation among Norwegian men. Cancer Causes Control. 2004;15(2):139–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Pukkala E. Use of record linkage in small-area studies. In: Elliott P, Cuzick J, English D, Stern R, editors. Geographical & environmental epidemiology: methods for small-area studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1992. p. 125–31.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Sigurdardottir LG, Jonasson JG, Stefansdottir S, et al. Data quality at the Icelandic Cancer Registry: comparability, validity, timeliness and completeness. Acta Oncol. 2012;51(7):880–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Gjerstorff ML. The Danish Cancer Registry. Scand J Public Health. 2011;39(7 Suppl):42–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Barlow L, Westergren K, Holmberg L, Talbäck M. The completeness of the Swedish Cancer Register: a sample survey for year 1998. Acta Oncol. 2009;48(1):27–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Larsen IK, Småstuen M, Johannesen TB, et al. Data quality at the Cancer Registry of Norway: an overview of comparability, completeness, validity and timeliness. Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(7):1218–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Teppo L, Pukkala E, Lehtonen M. Data quality and quality control of a population-based cancer registry. Experience in Finland. Acta Oncol. 1994;33(4):365–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Pershagen G, Elinder CG, Bolander AM. Mortality in a region surrounding an arsenic emitting plant. Environ Health Perspect. 1977;19:133–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Axelson O, Dahlgren E, Jansson CD, Rehnlund SO. Arsenic exposure and mortality: a case-referent study from a Swedish copper smelter. Br J Ind Med. 1978;35(1):8–15.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Wall S. Survival and mortality pattern among Swedish smelter workers. Int J Epidemiol. 1980;9(1):73–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Pershagen G. Lung cancer mortality among men living near an arsenic-emitting smelter. Am J Epidemiol. 1985;122(4):684–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Sandström A, Wall S. Cancer incidence among male salaried employees at a smeltery in Northern Sweden. Acta Oncol. 1993;32(1):9–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Pedersen E, Høgetveit AC, Andersen A. Cancer of respiratory organs among workers at a nickel refinery in Norway. Int J Cancer. 1973;12(1):32–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Magnus K, Andersen A, Høgetveit AC. Cancer of respiratory organs among workers at a nickel refinery in Norway. Int J Cancer. 1982;30(6):681–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Andersen A, Berge SR, Engeland A, Norseth T. Exposure to nickel compounds and smoking in relation to incidence of lung and nasal cancer among nickel refinery workers. Occup Environ Med. 1996;53:708–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Grimsrud TK, Berge SR, Martinsen JI, Andersen A. Lung cancer incidence among Norwegian nickel-refinery workers 1953–2000. J Environ Monit. 2003;5:190–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Grimsrud TK, Berge SR, Haldorsen T, Andersen A. Can lung cancer risk among nickel refinery workers be explained by occupational exposures other than nickel? Epidemiology. 2005;16:146–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Karjalainen S, Kerttula R, Pukkala E. Cancer risk among workers at a copper/nickel smelter and nickel refinery in Finland. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1992;63(8):547–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Anttila A, Pukkala E, Aitio A, Rantanen T, Karjalainen S. Update of cancer incidence among workers at a copper/nickel smelter and nickel refinery. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1998;71(4):245–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Andersen A, Dahlberg BE, Magnus K, Wannag A. Risk of cancer in the Norwegian aluminium industry. Int J Cancer. 1982;29(3):295–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Rønneberg A, Andersen A. Mortality and cancer morbidity in workers from an aluminium smelter with prebaked carbon anodes–Part II: cancer morbidity. Occup Environ Med. 1995;52(4):250–4.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Romundstad P, Andersen A, Haldorsen T. Cancer incidence among workers in six Norwegian aluminum plants. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2000;26(6):461–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Romundstad P, Andersen A, Haldorsen T. Cancer incidence among workers in the Norwegian silicon carbide industry. Am J Epidemiol. 2001;153(10):978–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Bugge MD, Kjærheim K, Føreland S, Eduard W, Kjuus H. Lung cancer incidence among Norwegian silicon carbide industry workers: associations with particulate exposure factors. Occup Environ Med. 2012;69(8):527–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Kjaerheim K. Occupational cancer research in the Nordic countries. Environ Health Perspect. 1999;107 Suppl 2:233–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Wiklund K, Einhorn J, Wennström G, Rapaport E. A Swedish cancer-environment register available for research. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1981;7(1):64–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Andersen A, Bjelke E, Langmark F. Cancer in waiters. Br J Cancer. 1989;60(1):112–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Lynge E. Occupational mortality and cancer analysis. Public Health Rev. 1990–1991;18(2):99–116.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Blair A. Occupation and cancer in the Nordic countries. Acta Oncol. 2009;48(5):644–5.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Andersen A, Barlow L, Engeland A, Kjaerheim K, Lynge E, Pukkala E. Work-related cancer in the Nordic countries. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1999;25 Suppl 2:1–116.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Kauppinen T, Heikkilä P, Plato N, et al. Construction of job-exposure matrices for the Nordic Occupational Cancer Study (NOCCA). Acta Oncol. 2009;48(5):791–800.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Kauppinen T, Toikkanen J, Pukkala E. From cross-tabulations to multipurpose exposure information systems: a new job-exposure matrix. Am J Ind Med. 1998;33(4):409–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, PB 5313 Majorstuen, Oslo, N-0304, Norway

    Tom K. Grimsrud MD, PhD

  2. Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

    Elisabete Weiderpass MD, MSc, PhD

  3. Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway

    Elisabete Weiderpass MD, MSc, PhD

  4. Department of Genetic Epidemiology, Folkhälsan Research Center, Helsinki, Finland

    Elisabete Weiderpass MD, MSc, PhD

  5. Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway

    Elisabete Weiderpass MD, MSc, PhD

Authors
  1. Tom K. Grimsrud MD, PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elisabete Weiderpass MD, MSc, PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tom K. Grimsrud MD, PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Helsinki University Central Hospital and Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland

    Sisko Anttila

  2. Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA

    Paolo Boffetta

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Grimsrud, T.K., Weiderpass, E. (2014). Role of Registers in Occupational Cancer Control. In: Anttila, S., Boffetta, P. (eds) Occupational Cancers. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2825-0_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2825-0_33

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-2824-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-2825-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation