Skip to main content

Abstract

Procedural success in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) depends on precise positioning and deployment of the valve in the three-dimensional aortic annulus and root. Fluoroscopy is the imaging modality typically relied on during valve positioning and deployment in TAVR. Accurate coaxial positioning of the valve with this method is best achieved by selecting a fluoroscopic deployment projection that is perpendicular to the native aortic valve plane. The use of a suboptimal “off-axis” fluoroscopic deployment projection may result in incorrect valve positioning and in turn lead to paravalvular aortic regurgitation, valve embolization, coronary ostium obstruction, heart block, or interference with the mitral valve apparatus [1–3]. Traditionally the native aortic plane has been assessed by invasive aortic root angiography, often requiring a number of aortograms be performed until a satisfactory projection is obtained. Frequently, however, such perpendicular projections are difficult to determine with significant contrast media utilized in attempts to do so in patients who often have significant renal dysfunction. More recently, multislice computed tomography (MDCT) has emerged as an accurate and practical alternative to repeated aortograms, providing operators with precise implant projections that can be determined prior to the procedure (Box 26.1). This chapter will outline the practical uses of MSCT to help predict the correct implant projection and review the available evidence with this technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 209.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wong DR, Ye J, Cheung A, Webb JB, Carera RG, Lichtenstein SV. Technical considerations to avoid pitfalls during transapical aortic valve implantation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;140:196–202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Al Ali AM, Altwegg L, Horlick EM, et al. Prevention and management of transcatheter balloon-expandable aortic valve malposition. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008;72:573–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Massoon JB, Kovac J, Schuler G, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: review of the nature, management, and avoidance of procedural complications. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2009;2:811–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gurvitch R, Wood DA, Leipsic J, et al. Multislice computed tomography for prediction of optimal angiographic deployment projections during transcatheter aortic valve implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2010;3:1157–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Binder RK, Leipsic J, Wood DA, et al. Prediction of optimal deployment projection for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: angiographic 3-dimensional reconstruction of the aortic root versus multidetector computed tomography. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5:247–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kurra V, Kapadia SR, Tuzcu EM, et al. Pre-procedural imaging of aortic root orientation and dimension: comparisons between X-ray angiographic planar imaging and 3-dimensional multidetector row computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2010;3:105–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ng AC, Delgado V, Van der Kley F, et al. Comparison of aortic root dimensions and geometries before and after transcatheter aortic valve implantation by 2- and 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography and multislice computed tomography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3:94–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wood DA, Tops LF, Mayo JR, et al. Role of multislice computed tomography in transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Am J Cardiol. 2009;103:1295–301.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tops LF, Wood DA, Delgado V, et al. Noninvasive evaluation of the aortic root with multislice computed tomography implications for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2008;1:321–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Leipsic J, Wood DA, Manders D, et al. The evolving role of MDCT in transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a radiologists’ perspective. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193:W214–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Leipsic J, Hague CJ, Gurvitch R, et al. MDCT to guide transcatheter aortic valve replacement and mitral valve repair. Cardiol Clin. 2012;30(1):147–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronen Gurvitch MD, MBBS, FRACP .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brooks, M., Gurvitch, R. (2014). Coaxial Angle Prediction for TAVR: CT. In: Min, J., Berman, D., Leipsic, J. (eds) Multimodality Imaging for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2798-7_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2798-7_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-2797-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-2798-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics