Skip to main content

Experimentation and Output Analysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Modelling and Simulation

Part of the book series: Simulation Foundations, Methods and Applications ((SFMA))

  • 3540 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter we explore the experimentation and output analysis phases of a modelling and simulation project which are both central to the success of the project. In other words, we examine the process of correctly formulating and carrying out goal-directed experiments with the simulation program and then extracting meaningful information from the data acquired via its output variables. Our interest throughout this chapter is primarily with scalar output variables SOVs which include the derived scalar output variable (whose value is derived from recorded values of a discrete-time variable) and the simple scalar output variable (whose value is calculated on the fly). Also of interest are the analysis techniques applied to these SOVs in achieving the project goals. An SOV acquires a value from a simulation run (the execution of the simulation model over the observation interval). Since the SUI has random behaviour, the SOV is typically a random variable. Numerous runs are required to give a set of values from which can be computed a point estimate (i.e. an estimate of the mean of the SOVs distribution) and a confidence interval which determines how close the point estimate is to the true mean. Thus the confidence interval allows the experimenter to determine the reliability of the point estimate. Techniques for determining the point estimate and confidence intervals are presented for both the bounded horizon study (where the right-hand side of the observation interval is fixed and where the SUI typically contains transient stochastic processes) and the steady-state study (where the right-hand side of the observation interval is not fixed and the SUI has a steady-state behaviour). The chapter also adapts these statistical techniques for comparison of alternative behaviours of the SUI when model parameters are varied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Strictly speaking, this is not entirely correct. In the context of a steady-state study, there does exist an approach called the method of batch means where all required data is generated from a single long simulation run. A brief discussion can be found in Sect. 7.3.2.

  2. 2.

    In some environments (e.g. Java), it may be possible to save the state of the simulation program for each replication so that simulations runs can be continued from the previously specified t f .

References

  1. Banks J, Carson JS II, Nelson BL, Nicol DM (2005) Discrete-event system simulation, 4th edn. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  2. Goldsman D, Nelson BL (1998) Comparing systems via simulation. In: Banks J (ed) Handbook of simulation. Wiley, New York, pp 273–306

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Goldsman D, Nelson BL (2001) Statistical selection of the best system. In: Peters BA, Smith JS, Medeiros DJ, Rohrer MW (eds) Proceeding of the 2001 winter simulation Conference. IEEE Press, Piscataway, pp 139–146

    Google Scholar 

  4. Goldsman D, Schruben LW, Swain JJ (1994) Test for transient means in simulation time series. Nav Res Logist Q 41:171–187

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Law AM, Kelton DW (2000) Simulation modeling and analysis, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. Robinson S (2002) A statistical process control approach for estimating the warm-up period. In: Proceeding of the 2002 winter simulation conference. IEEE, Piscataway, pp 439–446

    Google Scholar 

  7. Roth E (1994) The relaxation time heuristic for the initial transient problem in M/M/K queuing systems. Eur J Oper Res 72:376–386

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Welch P (1983) The statistical analysis of simulation results. In: Lavenberg S (ed) The computer performance modeling handbook. Academic, New York, pp 268–328

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Birta, L.G., Arbez, G. (2013). Experimentation and Output Analysis. In: Modelling and Simulation. Simulation Foundations, Methods and Applications. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2783-3_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2783-3_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-2782-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-2783-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics