Skip to main content

Microbiological Processing of Samples in the Investigation of Suspected Prosthetic Joint Infection

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Infected Total Joint Arthroplasty

Abstract

Microbiological diagnosis is the most important issue in the evaluation of a PJI. It guides further treatment. The outcomes of PJI treatment reflect the quality if the initial microbiological assessment. Aspiration and tissue cultures are still the most important samples for microbiological evaluation of PJI. The chapter presents the appropriate workout for the specimens and the potential pitfalls in the sampling and handling of specimens obteined for microbiological analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Stefansdottir A, Johansson D, Knutson K, Lidgren L, Robertsson O. Microbiology of the infected knee arthroplasty: report from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register on 426 surgically revised cases. Scand J Infect Dis. 2009;41(11–12):831–40. doi:10.3109/00365540903186207.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fink B, Makowiak C, Fuerst M, Berger I, Schafer P, Frommelt L. The value of synovial biopsy, joint aspiration and C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of late peri-prosthetic infection of total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90(7):874–8. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.90B7.20417. PII:90-B/7/874.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Del Pozo JL, Patel R. Clinical practice. Infection associated with prosthetic joints. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(8):787–94. doi:10.1056/NEJMcp0905029. PII:361/8/787.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Trampuz A, Piper KE, Jacobson MJ, Hanssen AD, Unni KK, Osmon DR, Mandrekar JN, Cockerill FR, Steckelberg JM, Greenleaf JF, Patel R. Sonication of removed hip and knee prostheses for diagnosis of infection. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(7):654–63. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa061588. PII:357/7/654.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Della Valle C, Parvizi J, Bauer TW, DiCesare PE, Evans RP, Segreti J, Spangehl M, Watters 3rd WC, Keith M, Turkelson CM, Wies JL, Sluka P, Hitchcock K. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons clinical practice guideline on: the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections of the hip and knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(14):1355–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Moran E, Byren I, Atkins BL. The diagnosis and management of prosthetic joint infections. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010;65 Suppl 3:iii45–54. doi:10.1093/jac/dkq305. PII:dkq305.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Health Protection Agency. Investigation of prosthetic joint infection samples. National Standard Method BSOP 44 Issue 1.1. 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Holinka J, Bauer L, Hirschl AM, Graninger W, Windhager R, Presterl E. Sonication cultures of explanted components as an add-on test to routinely conducted microbiological diagnostics improve pathogen detection. J Orthop Res. 2011;29(4):617–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Khater FJ, Samnani IQ, Mehta JB, Moorman JP, Myers JW. Prosthetic joint infection by Mycobacterium tuberculosis: an unusual case report with literature review. South Med J. 2007;100(1):66–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Atkins BL, Athanasou N, Deeks JJ, Crook DW, Simpson H, Peto TE, McLardy-Smith P, Berendt AR. Prospective evaluation of criteria for microbiological diagnosis of prosthetic-joint infection at revision arthroplasty. The OSIRIS Collaborative Study Group. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36(10):2932–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Brook I. Comparison of two transport systems for recovery of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria from abscesses. J Clin Microbiol. 1987;25(10):2020–2.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hughes HC, Newnham R, Athanasou N, Atkins BL, Bejon P, Bowler IC. Microbiological diagnosis of prosthetic joint infections: a prospective evaluation of four bacterial culture media in the routine laboratory. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011;17(10):1528–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bergamini TM, Bandyk DF, Govostis D, Vetsch R, Towne JB. Identification of Staphylococcus epidermidis vascular graft infections: a comparison of culture techniques. J Vasc Surg. 1989;9(5):665–70. PII:S0741-5214(89)70037-9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Butler-Wu SM, Burns EM, Pottinger PS, Magaret AS, Rakeman JL, Matsen 3rd FA, Cookson BT. Optimization of periprosthetic culture for diagnosis of Propionibacterium acnes prosthetic joint infection. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49(7):2490–5. doi:10.1128/JCM.00450-11. PII:JCM.00450-11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bailey C, Duckett S, Davies S, Townsend R, Stockley I. Haemophilus parainfluenzae prosthetic joint infection. The importance of accurate microbiological diagnosis and options for management. J Infect. 2011;63(6):474–6. doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2011.08.009. PII:S0163-4453(11)00461-0.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Harris LG, El-Bouri K, Johnston S, Rees E, Frommelt L, Siemssen N, Christner M, Davies AP, Rohde H, Mack D. Rapid identification of staphylococci from prosthetic joint infections using MALDI-TOF mass-spectrometry. Int J Artif Organs. 2010;33(9):568–74. PII:2213A231-7A27-44BF-A569-CAC6A2777982.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Fenollar F, Roux V, Stein A, Drancourt M, Raoult D. Analysis of 525 samples to determine the usefulness of PCR amplification and sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene for diagnosis of bone and joint infections. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44(3):1018–28. doi:10.1128/JCM.44.3.1018-1028.2006. PII:44/3/1018.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Fihman V, Hannouche D, Bousson V, Bardin T, Liote F, Raskine L, Riahi J, Sanson-Le Pors MJ, Bercot B. Improved diagnosis specificity in bone and joint infections using molecular techniques. J Infect. 2007;55(6):510–7. doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2007.09.001. PII:S0163-4453(07)00755-4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Panousis K, Grigoris P, Butcher I, Rana B, Reilly JH, Hamblen DL. Poor predictive value of broad-range PCR for the detection of arthroplasty infection in 92 cases. Acta Orthop. 2005;76(3):341–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gallo J, Kolar M, Dendis M, Loveckova Y, Sauer P, Zapletalova J, Koukalova D. Culture and PCR analysis of joint fluid in the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection. New Microbiol. 2008;31(1):97–104.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rob Towsend .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Partridge, D.G., Towsend, R. (2012). Microbiological Processing of Samples in the Investigation of Suspected Prosthetic Joint Infection. In: Trebše, R. (eds) Infected Total Joint Arthroplasty. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2482-5_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2482-5_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-2481-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-2482-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics