Skip to main content

Abstract

The design of a more sustainable supply chain is the main topic of this chapter. Recently [Halldorsson A, Kotzab H, Skjøtt-Larsen T (2009) Logist Res 1:83–94] raised an important question: how could sustainability be integrated in the SCM approach—is sustainability coherent, complementary, or contradictory to the traditional SCM approach? This chapter includes a discussion on the meaning of sustainability when it comes to SCM as well as a suggestion of how to incorporate sustainability into the SCM concept. The character of this paper is conceptual and based on a literature review and secondary data analysis of illustrative case examples. Just as economic globalization creates opportunities and poses challenges to our ability to formulate macroeconomic policies, so does environmental globalization. The opportunity for business profit is an additional motive for the companies. Relevant legislations in developed countries derive from the social demand for environmental protection and the perspective that the manufacturers should be made responsible for their products “from cradle to grave” has dominated. However, it can be claimed that the efforts made so far are rather limited, while nobody would argue against the need for a global approach to the situation. Developed countries or leader firms, mainly, have established environmental policies for product recovery. The issue of how effective these policies are is debatable. The scope of this chapter is to identify systematically environmental principles for the design and operation of SC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alting L, Hauschild M, Wenzel H (1998) Elements in a new sustainable industrial culture environmental assessment in product development. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 14:429–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen Corporation, Ashland Chemical (2000) EPA742-R-00-XXX, forthcoming in 2000. www.epa.gov/opptintr/acctg

  • Atkinson W (2002) Demand for green solvents will boom. Purchasing Magazine Online, October 10. www.purchasing.com/article/CA250861.html. Accessed 20 May 2005

  • Bierma TJ, Waterstraat FL (1999) Chemical management: reducing waste and cost through innovative chemical supply strategies. In: Chemical Strategies Partnership, Tools for Optimizing Chemical Management Manual, forthcoming, Wiley, New York. www.chemicalstrategies.org

  • Boyer M, Porrini D (2002) The choice of instruments for environmental policy: liability or regulation? An introduction to the law and economics of environmental policy: issues in institutional design. Res Law Econ 20:1–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Certified Organic Food Standards (2005) http://www.ifoam.org/about_ifoam/standards/pgs/PGSDefinitioninEngFrenSpanPort_web.pdf

  • Clift R (2003) Metrics for supply chain sustainability. Clean Technol Env Policy 5(3–4):240–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connor T (2001) Still waiting for nike to do it. A Global Exchange Report. www.globalexchange.org/campaigns/sweatshops/nike/stillwaiting.html. Accessed 5 June 2005

  • Daniel SE, Diakoulaki DC, Pappis CP (1997) Operations research and environmental planning. Eur J Oper Res 102:248e63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ron Ad J de (1998) The ultimate result of continuous improvement. Int J Prod Econ 56–57(1): 99–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyllick T, Hockerts K (2002) Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Bus strategy Environ 11(2):130–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkington J (1998) Cannibals with forks. The triple bottom line of 21st century business. New Society Publishers, Tintown

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkington J (2001) The Chrysalis economy. Capstone Publishing Ltd, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Tax Policy Institute. (2005) www.vermontlaw.edu/elc/index.cfm?doc_id=134. Accessed 17 May 2005

  • EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2000) A practical guide for materials managers and supply chain managers to reduce costs and improve environmental performance. www.epa.gov/wastewise

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2000) Enhancing materials management and supply chain performance with environmental cost information: examples from commonwealth edison, Andersen Corporation, and Ashland Chemical, EPA742-R-00-XXX, www.epa.gov/opptintr/acctgwww.epa.gov/opptintr/acctg.

  • Faucheux S, Nicolai I (1998) Environmental technological change and governance in sustainable development policy. Ecol Econ 27:243e56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Germany’s Blue Angel Certification (2005) www.blauer-engel.de/englisch/navigation/body_blauer_engel.htm. Accessed 1 June 2005

  • Green Seal Product Certification (2005) www.greenseal.org. Accessed 1 June 2005

  • GreenTech Assets Inc. (2005) www.greentechassets.com. Accessed 31 May 2005

  • Gregory J, Atlee J, Isaacs J, Kirchain R (2004) Sustainability metrics for materials use at the system and operational level. Materials Systems Laboratory discussion paper

    Google Scholar 

  • Grenon M, Joseph M, Turner M (2007) How big is your carbon footprint. CSCMP Supply chain quarterly

    Google Scholar 

  • Halldorsson A, Kotzab H, Skjøtt-Larsen T (2009) Supply chain management on the crossroad to sustainability: a blessing or a curse? Logist Res 1:83–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handfield R, Sroufe R, Walton S (2005) Integrating environmental management and supply chain management. Bus Strategy Environ 14(1):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen N (2004) Organic food sales see health growth. MSNBC News Online, 3 Dec 2004. www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6638417/. Accessed 20 May 2005

  • Hoffman A (2005) Business decisions and the environment: significance, challenges, and momentum of an emerging research field. In: Brewer G, Stern P (eds) National Research Council, Decision Making for the Environment: Social and Behavioural Science Research Priorities

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins MJ, Sutherland JW (2008) An exploration of measures of social sustainability and their application to supply chain decisions. J Clean Prod 16(15): 1688–1698

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayaraman V, Luo Y (2007) Creating competitive advantages through new value creation: a reverse logistics perspective. Academy of management perspectives, pp 56–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Klassen RD, Johnson PF (2004) The green supply chain. In: Westbrook R, New S (eds) Understanding supply chains: concepts, critique and futures. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopicki RJ, Berg MJ, Legg L, Dasappa V, Maggioni C (1993) Reuse and recycling: reverse logistics opportunities. Council of Logistics Management, referenced in Hoek, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  • Kura Y, Revenga C, Hoshino E, Mock G (2004) Fishing for answers: making sense of the global fish crisis. World Resource Institute Report. pubs.wri.org/pubs_description.cfm?PubID=3866. Accessed 30 May 2005

  • Maloni M, Brown M (2006) Corporate social responsibility in the supply chain: an application in the food industry. J Bus Ethics 68(1):35–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mamic I (2005) Managing global supply chain: the sports footwear, apparel and retail sectors. J Bus Ethics 59:81–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy PR, Poist RF, Braunschweig CD (1996) Green logistics: comparative views of environmental progressives, moderates, and conservatives. J Bus Logist 17/1:191–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel C, Meyer P (1999) Caught between ecology and economy: end-of life aspects of environmentally conscious manufacturing. Comput Ind Eng 36:781e92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paquette J (2005) Supply Chain 2020, a research initiative investigating the critical factors shaping supply chains of today and tomorrow. Engineering Systems Division, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, June

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce F (2009) Confessions of an eco sinner: travels to find where my stuff comes from, Eden Project Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Pojasek RB (1998) Activity-Based Costing for EHS Improvement. Pollution Prevention Review, Winter 1998, pp 111–120. www.pollutionprevention.com

  • Puckett J (2002) Exporting harm: the high tech trashing of Asia. A Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition Report, February 2002. www.svtc.org/cleancc/pubs/technotrash.pdf. Accessed 5 June 2005

  • Rabs H, Bohn C (2003) Bæredygtig supply chain management: et studie i muligheden for at anvende supply chain management til at gøre en virksomhed bæredygtig. Unpublished M.Sc. thesis, CBS, Denmark

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts JA (1996) Green consumers in the 1990s: profile and implications for advertising. J Bus Res 36/1:217–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts S (2003) Supply chain specific? Understanding the patchy success of ethical sourcing initiatives. J Bus Ethics 44/2:159–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkis J (1995) Manufacturing strategy and environmental consciousness. Technovation 15(2):79e97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrivastava P (1995) Environmental technologies and competitive advantage. Strateg Manag J 16(3):183e200

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava SK (2007) Green supply-chain management: a state of-the-art literature review. Int J Manag Rev 9(1):53–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsoulfas GT, Pappis CP (2006) Environmental principles applicable to supply. J Clean Prod 14:1593–1602

    Google Scholar 

  • Unilever’s annual report describing efforts to build and sustain reliable fish supplies is available at www.unilever.com/ourvalues/environmentandsociety/default.asp. Accessed 5 May 2005

  • United Nations Environmental Program (2002) Vital graphics: an overview of the state of the world’s fresh and marine waters. www.unep.org/vitalwater/. Accessed 30 May 2005

  • US Environmental Protection Agency (2005) Energy star program. www.energystar.gov/. Accessed 1 June 2005

  • US Green Building Council. Leadership in energy and environmental design is a national rating system to certify green buildings, administered by the www.usgbc.org/LEED/. Accessed 1 June 2005

  • Walls M (2005) The role of economics in extended producer responsibility: making policy. Res Energy Econ 27(4):287–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton SV, Handfield RB, Melnyk SA (1999) The green supply chain: integrating suppliers into environmental management processes. Int J Purch Mater Manag 34(2):2–11, referenced in Hoek, 1999. www.rff.org/Documents/RFF-DP-03-11.pdf. Accessed 28 May 2005

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maurizio Bevilacqua .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bevilacqua, M., Ciarapica, F.E., Giacchetta, G. (2012). Design a Sustainable Supply Chain. In: Design for Environment as a Tool for the Development of a Sustainable Supply Chain. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2461-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2461-0_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-2460-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-2461-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics