Skip to main content

Abstract

According to many authors, despite the number of available DfE methods and tools, there are relatively few which are widely used by companies. One reason for this low utilization is that they are time-consuming; another is that many of them focus only on environmental issues (Ehrenfeld and Lenox, J Sustain Product Design (1):17–27, 1997). For the enterprises and their engineering designers of course, the environmental issue is but one of many issues to be considered. When DfE methods and tools are used, these methods and tools are often not integrated in the product development process. Chap. 6 investigates the integration opportunities between DfE and Environmental Management System or Product Life Cycle Cost.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The paradox is that when the general design information is needed, it is not accessible, and when it is accessible, the information is usually not needed.

References

  • Ammenberg J, Hjelm O (2002) The connection between environmental management systems and continual environmental performance improvements. Corp Environ Strategy 9(2):183–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ammenberg J (2003) Do standardised environmental management systems lead to reduced environmental impacts? Dissertation, No. 851. ISBN 91-7373-124-2. Environmental Technology and management. Linko¨ ping University, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  • Ammenberg J, Sundin E (2005) Products in environmental management systems: drivers, barriers and experiences. J Clean Prod 13:405–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumann H, Boons F, Bragd A (2002) Mapping the green product development field: engineering, policy and business perspectives. J Clean Prod 10(5):409–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkhout F (1998) Aggregate resource efficiency. are radical improvements impossible? In: Vellinga P, Berkhout F, Gupta J (eds) Managing a material world Perspectives in industrial ecology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 165–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Biswas G, Haftbaradaran H, Kawamura K, Hunkeler D, Lantz J, Shahinpoor M, Quinn T (1997) An environmentally conscious decision support system based on a streamlined LCA and a cost residual risk evaluation: fluorescent light bulb case study. Int J Environ Conscious Des Manuf 6(3):9–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovea M, Vidal R (2004) Materials selection for sustainable product design: A case study of wood-based furniture eco-design. Mater Des 25:111–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brezet JC, Bijma A, Silvester S (2000) Innovative electronics as an opportunity for eco-efficient services, In: Reichl EHH, Griese H (eds), Electronics Goes Green 2000 + , Proceedings vol 1 pp 859–865

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulter S, Bras B (1999) Decision support for systematic product evolution. In: Proceedings of the 1999 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, ASME, DTEC99/DTM-8747

    Google Scholar 

  • Craighill AL, Powell JC (1996) Lifecycle assessment and economic evaluation of recycling: a case study. Resour Conserv Recycl 17:75–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenfeld JR, Lenox MJ (1997) The development and implementation of DfE programmes. J Sustain Product Design (1):17–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Emblemsvåg J (2003) Life-cycle costing Using activity-based costing and monte carlo methods to manage future costs and risks. Wiley, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Emzer M, Birkhofer H (2002) Selecting methods for life cycle design based on the needs of a company intemational design conference—design. Dubrovnik, Croatia

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabrycky WJ, Blanchard BS (1991) Life-cycle cost and economic analysis. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Gluch P, Baumann H (2004) The life cycle costing (LCC) approach: a conceptual discussion of its usefulness for environmental decision-making. Build Environ 39:571–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISO Standards (2009) http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/management_standards/iso_9000_iso_14000/iso_14000_essentials.htm (1/3/2010)

  • Karlsson M (2001) Green concurrent engineering. A model for DFE management programs. Doctoral Dissertation, The International Institute for Industrial Environmental Economics, Lund University, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindahl M (2005) Engineering designers’ requirements on design for environment methods and tools. Industrial

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutz J, Lekov A, Chan P, Whitehead CD, Meyers S, McMahon J (2006) Life-cycle cost analysis of energy efficiency design options for residential furnaces and boilers. Energy 31:311–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lye SW, Lee SG, Khoo MK (2001) A design methodology for the strategic assessment of a product’s eco-efficiency. Int J Prod Res 39(11):2453–2474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasr N, Varel EA (1997) Total product life cycle analysis and costing. In: Proceedings of the 1997 Total Life Cycle Conference. Life Cycle Management and Assessment (Part 1). Society of Automotive Engineer (SAE), Inc., Warrendale PA, USA, p 9–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Norell M (1992) St6dmetoder och samverkan i produktutveckling St6dmetoder och samverkan i produktutveckling. Stockholm, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  • Ries G, Winkler R, Zu¨ st R (1999) Barriers for a successful integration of environmental aspects in product design. Proceedings of ‘‘EcoDesign ‘99’’. First international symposium on environmental conscious design and inverse manufacturing, Feb 1–3, Tokyo, Japan, 1999. pp 527–532

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritzen S, Lindahl M (2001) Selection and implementation—key activities to successful use of EcoDesign tools. In: Proceedings EcoDesign 2001: 2nd international symposium on environmentally conscious design and inverse Union of ecodesigners (Association of EcoDesign Societies)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuijt K (2003) Economic valuation of the environment: an institutional perspective. In: Environmental management accounting. Purpose and progress. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 387–403

    Google Scholar 

  • Senthil KD, Ong SK, Nee AYC, Tan RBH (2003) A proposed tool to integrate environmental and economical assessments of products. Environ Impact Assess Rev 23:51–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro KG (2001) Incorporating costs in LCA. Int J LCA 6(29):121–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherif YS, Kolarik WJ (1981) Life cycle costing: concept and practice. Omega 9:287–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tukker A, Haag E, Eder P (2000) Eco-desig: European state of the art —Part I: Comparative analysis and conclusions—An ESTO project report. European Commission. joint research centre institute for prospective technological studies: Brussels, Luxembourg, p 60

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidal R, Bovea MD, Georgantzis N, Camacho-Cuena E (2002) Es rentable diseñar productos ecológicos? El caso del mueble (Is profitable to design ecological products? The furniture case). Castellón, Spain: Ed. Universitat Jaume I [in Spanish]

    Google Scholar 

  • Warburg N, Hemam C, Chiodo JD (2001) Accompanying the (re)design of products with environmental assessment (DfE) on the example of ADSM, IEEE international symposium on electronics and the environment, pp 202–207

    Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED) (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maurizio Bevilacqua .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bevilacqua, M., Ciarapica, F.E., Giacchetta, G. (2012). Designers’ Utilization of DfE and Requirements. In: Design for Environment as a Tool for the Development of a Sustainable Supply Chain. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2461-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2461-0_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-2460-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-2461-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics