Abstract
To strengthen the teaching management and improve the teaching quality and efficiency, it is necessary to establish a scientific teaching evaluation system. That is to select students' test scores as evaluation indicator, students’ original study level as covariate, and us covariance analysis method and the SAS software to evaluate teachers' teaching quality. The evaluating results therefore can reflect the real teaching level more objectively and fairly. This not only provides an operational method to scientifically evaluate the teaching quality, but also motivates teachers’ working enthusiasm, and thus improves teaching management level.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
H. Zhang, Meaning and basic orientation of curriculum implementation, Journal of Foreign Education Studies, No.2 (1999) 28–33.
Z.J. Li, Orientation and prospects of schools, curriculum and teaching reform, Journal of Basic Education, No.2 (2002) 2–13.
Y.G. Xie, A case study of curriculum implementation in high school-the school level characteristics and attribution, Northeast Normal University, 2007.
X.M. Xia, A review of curriculum implementation of western teachers’ education in four decades, Global Education, No.270 (2010) 21–26.
L.F. Shi, Curriculum theory-basis, principles and problems, Beijing: Education Science Press, 1996.
S.B. Keating, Curriculum development and evaluation in nursing, Germen: Second Edition, Springer Publishing Company, 2011.
K.E. Ferguson, A. M. Jinks, Integrating what is taught with what is practiced in the nursing curriculum: a multi-dimensional model. Journal of Advanced Nursing, Vol. 20, No. 4, (1994) 687–695.
Z.J. Li, H.B. Yin, Curriculum implementation of postmodern perspective, East China Normal University (Educational Science Edition), No.1 (2003) 21–33.
X.L. Wei, The overall quality of nursing teachers in modern school, Probe, No.7 (2008) 171–172.
L.R. Uys, L.L. Van Rhyn, N.S. Gwele, et al. Problem-solving competency of nursing graduates, Journal of Advanced Nursing, Vol. 48, No. 5 (2004) 500–509.
X.H. Dai, Q.L. Zhao, M. Li, An survey of knowledge structure and knowledge needs of nursing undergraduate teachers in the Heilongjiang province, Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing, No.24 (2008) 74–76.
L.A. Furr, C.J. Binkley, C. McCurren, et al. Factors affecting quality of oral care in intensive care units, Journal of Advanced Nursing, Vol. 48, No. 5 (2004) 454–462.
J.I. Hwang, H.A. Park, Factors associated with nurses’ informatics competency, CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing, Vol. 29, No.4 (2011) 256–262.
K. Aranda, A. Jones, Exploring new advanced practice roles in community nursing: a critique, Nursing Inquiry, Vol. 15, No. 1 (2008) 3–10.
Acknowledgment
This work is supported by the Special Talent Foundation of Ningxia Medical University. The authors would like to thank anonymous reviewers and the editors for constructive comments and suggestions. 408 Information Engineering and Applications.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this paper
Cite this paper
Zhang, H., Zhang, W. (2012). Some Factors Affecting Nursing Curriculum Implementation. In: Zhu, R., Ma, Y. (eds) Information Engineering and Applications. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 154. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2386-6_134
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2386-6_134
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-2385-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-2386-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)