Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Green Energy and Technology ((GREEN))

Abstract

In fuzzy Multi-criteria decision-making problems, the ranking of alternatives must take into account their fuzzy scores in all criteria, the weights assigned to each decision criterion, the possible difficulties of comparing two alternatives when one is significantly better than the other on a subset of criteria, but much worse on at least one criterion from the complementary subset of criteria, and the decision maker’s attitude towards the risk associated with evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Shing D, Tiong RLK (2005) A fuzzy decision framework for contractor selection. J Constr Eng M ASCE 131(1):62–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shapley LS (1953) A value for n-person games contribution to the theory of games. In: Kuhn HW, Tucker AW (eds) Annals of mathematics studies. vol II. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 307–317

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hwang CL, Yoon K (1981) Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Kaufmann A, Gupta MM (1988) Fuzzy mathematical models in engineering and management science. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Krus L, Bronisz P (2000) Cooperative game solution concepts to a cost allocation problem. Eur J Oper Res 122(2):258–271

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang L, Fang L, Hipel KW (2008) Basin-wide coperative water resources allocation. Eur J Oper Res 3(1):798–817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sant’Anna LA, Sant’Anna AP (2008) A probabilistic approach to evaluate the exploitation of the gepgraphic situation of hydroelectric plants. Energ Policy 36(7):2320–2329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Albretch J, Francois D, Schoors K (2002) A Shapley decomposition of carbon emissions without residulas. Energ Policy 30:727–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ang BW, Liu FL, Chew EP (2003) Perfect decomposition techniques in energy and environmental analysis. Energ Policy 31:1561–1566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wu JH, Chen YY, Huang YH (2007) Trade pattern change impact on industrial \(\hbox{CO}_2\) emissions in Taiwan. Energ Policy 35(11):5436–5446

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José Ramón San Cristóbal Mateo .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mateo, J.R.S.C. (2012). The Shapley Value. In: Multi Criteria Analysis in the Renewable Energy Industry. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2346-0_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2346-0_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-2345-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-2346-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics