Eco-Design in the Furniture and Wood-Processing Sector in Spain: Benefits and Constraints

Conference paper


The objective of this study is to analyze the main benefits and constraints of the implementation of eco-design solutions in wooden products manufacturers and furniture companies in Spain, and whether this results in significant differences between both sectors. Although the level of eco-design implementation in both sectors is rather low, companies have considered some new eco-design strategies in product process development which are mainly related to energy and raw material optimization, use of non-hazardous substances and reduction of waste, obtaining some benefits but sometimes facing impediments that hinder its application. This study reveals that there are not statistical differences between both sectors in terms of their level of understanding of the benefits and constraints of eco-design. Most of the companies surveyed agreed that the main benefits derived from eco-design are not only related with reducing their environmental impact but also with other advantages such as improved company´s image, new market opportunities and meeting normative and legal requirements. On the other hand, limitations are mainly related to lack of knowledge and conflict with functional and quality product requirements.


Market Opportunity Main Benefit Life Cycle Phase Sustainable Material Small Random Sample 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Boks C (2006) The soft side of eco-design. J Clean Prod 14:1346–1356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Currell G, Dowman A (2009) Essential mathematics and statistics for science. Wiley-Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  3. Gravetter FJ, Wallnan LB (2009) Statistics for the behavioural sciences. Wadsworth Cengage LearningGoogle Scholar
  4. Houe R, Grabot B (2009) Assessing the compliance of a product with an eco-label: From standards to constraints. J Clean Prod 121:21–38Google Scholar
  5. Knight P, Jenkins JO (2009) Adopting and applying ecodesign techniques: a practitioners perspective. J Clean Prod 17:549–558 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kurk F, Eagan M (2008) The value of adding design for the environment to pollution prevention assistance options. J Clean Prod 16:722–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Miquel S et al (1997) Investigción mercados. Mc Graw Hill, MadridGoogle Scholar
  8. Mont OK (2002) Clarifying the concept of product–service system. J Clean Prod 10:237–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Panik MJ (2005) Advanced statistics from an elementary point of view. ElsevierGoogle Scholar
  10. Parikka-Alhola K (2008) Promoting environmentally sound furniture by green public procurement. J Clean Prod 68:472–485Google Scholar
  11. van Hemel C, Cramer J (2002) Barriers and stimuli for eco-design in SMES. J Clean Prod 10:439–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited  2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Centre on Production Management and EngineeringUniversidad Politécnica de ValenciaValenciaSpain

Personalised recommendations