Abstract
The issue of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) management is an ever increasing problem for all countries. Developed countries face the problem of dealing with very large amounts of MSW per capita, forcing them to develop new technologies and systems. On the other hand, countries with developing or transitional economies may generate lower amounts of MSW per capita, but the rate of increase is high and the current practices of MSW management are not as advanced as those of developed countries. Therefore, countries with developing or transitional economies may benefit from adopting MSW management technologies used by developed economies. One aspect of MSW management in developed economies is the energy recovery from MSW. The advantages of this type of technologies are mainly the significantly reduced waste volume for landfilling, the reduction of total greenhouse gas emissions, the potential for generating electricity or co-generation of electricity and heat. In this work, a comparative study of the most prominent co-generation technologies using MSW as a fuel source is presented, focusing on the evolution of their economical performance over time. An algorithm based on real-options has been applied for four technologies of MSW energy recovery: (1) incineration, (2) gasification, (3) landfill biogas exploitation using a pipeline system and (4) anaerobic digestion facilities. The financial contributors are identified and the impact of greenhouse gas trading is analyzed in terms of financial yields, considering landfilling as the baseline scenario. The greenhouse gas trading system presents an opportunity for investing in environmentally friendly technologies for MSW energy recovery, through the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), in most developing countries. The results of this work indicate an advantage of combined heat and power over solely electricity generation. The most attractive technology among the ones examined proves to be incineration, mainly due to its higher power production efficiency, lower investment costs and lower emission rates. Despite the fact that these characteristics may not drastically change over time, either immediate or irreversible investment decisions might be reconsidered under the current selling prices of heat, power and CO2 allowances.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
ACMAR (2009) Association of Communities and Municipalities of the Attica Region, 11.09.09 www.esdkna.gr
Barlow MT (2002) A diffusion model for electricity prices. Math Finan 12(4):287–298
Barton JR, Issaias I, Stentiford EI (2008) Carbon—making the right choice for waste management in developing countries. Waste Manag 28:690–698
Brennan MJ, Schwartz E (1985) Evaluating natural resource investments. J Bus 58:135–157
Clewlow L, Strickland C (2000) Energy derivatives: pricing and risk management. Lacima Publications, London
Dixit A, Pindyck R (1994) Investment under uncertainty. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Eleftheriou P (2007) Energy from waste: a possible alternative energy source for large size municipalities. Waste Manag Res 25:483–486
Fuss S, Szolgayova J, Obersteiner M, Gusti M (2008) Investment under market and climate policy uncertainty. Appl Energy 85:708–721
Garg A, Smith R, Hill D, Longhurst PJ, Pollard SJT, Simms NJ (2009) An integrated appraisal of energy recovery options in the United Kingdom using solid recovered fuel derived from municipal solid waste. Waste Manag 29:2289–2297
General Secretariat of National Statistical Service of Greece 10.09.2009, www.statistics.gr
Glasserman G (2004) Monte-Carlo methods in financial engineering. Springer-Verlag, NY
Gohlke O (2009) Efficiency of energy recovery from municipal solid waste and the resultant effect on the greenhouse gas balance. Waste Manag Res 27:894–906
Greek Ministry of Development (2009) 13.09.09 www.ypan.gr
Hansen TL, Jansen J, Davidson A, Christensen TH (2007) Effects of pre-treatment technologies on quantity and quality of source-sorted municipal organic waste for biogas recovery. Waste Manag 27:398–405
Hesseling WFM (2002) Thermoselect Facility report, TNO R2002/126
HTSO SA (2009) Hellenic transmission system operator. 08.08.09, www.desmie.gr
Ingersoll JE, Ross SA (1992) Waiting to invest: investment and uncertainty. J Bus 65(1):1–29
Junginger M, Faaij A, Turkenburg WC (2005) Global experience curves for wind farms. Energy Policy 33(2):133–150
Kathirvale S, Yunus MM, Sopian K, Samduddin AH (2003) Energy potential from municipal solid waste in Malaysia. Renew Energy 29(4):559–567
Kloeden PE, Platen E (1999) Numerical solution of stochastic differential equations. Springer, Berlin
Laurikka H, Koljonen T (2006) Emissions trading and investment decisions in the power sector-a case study in Finland. Energy Policy 34:1063–1074
Luoranen M, Horttanainen M (2007) Feasibility of energy recovery from municipal solid waste in an integrated municipal energy supply and waste management system. Waste Manag Res 25:426–439
Luoranen M, Horttanainen M (2008) Co-generation based energy recovery from municipal solid waste integrated with the existing energy supply system. Waste Manag 28:30–38
Medina M (1997) The effect of income on municipal solid waste generation rates for countries of varying levels of economic development: a model. J Solid Waste Technol Manag 24(3):149–155
Møller J, Boldrin A, Christensen TH (2009) Anaerobic digestion and digestate use: accounting of greenhouse gases and global warming contribution. Waste Manag Res 29:813–824
Murphy JD, McKeogh E (2004) Analysis of energy production from municipal solid waste. Renew Energy 29:1043–1057
Øksendal B (2000) Stochastic deferential equations. Springer-Verlag, Berlin
Onu C (2000) Sustainable waste management in developing countries. In: Proceedings of the biennial congress of the institute of waste management of Southern Africa, WasteCon’00, Cape Town, South Africa, pp 367–378
Papageorgiou A, Barton JR, Karagiannidis A (2009) Assessment of the greenhouse effect impact of technologies used for energy recovery from municipal waste: a case for England. J Environ Manag 90:2999–3012
Parrot L, Sotamenou J, Dia BK (2009) Municipal solid waste management in Africa: strategies and livelihoods in Yaoundé, Cameroon. Waste Manag 29:986–995
Point Carbon (2009) Carbon market indicator. 12.08.2009, http://www.pointcarbon.com
Reimann D (2009) CEWEP energy report II (Status 2004–2007). Confederation of European waste to energy plants
Rentizelas A, Tolis A, Tatsiopoulos I (2009) Biomass district energy trigeneration systems: emissions reduction and financial impact. Water Soil Air Pollut J Focus 9(1–2):139–150
Rubin ES (2007) Learning rates and future cost of power plants with CO2 capture. IEA international workshop on technology learning and deployment, Paris, France, 11 June 2007
Shreve R (2004) Stochastic calculus for finance II: continuous-time models. Springer-Verlag, Berlin
Tatsiopoulos I, Tolis A (2003) Economic aspects of the cotton-stalk biomass logistics and comparison of supply chain methods. Biomass Bioenergy 24:199–214
Trigeorgis L (1996) Real options. The MIT Press, Cambridge
Tsilemou K, Panagiotakopoulos D (2006) Approximate cost functions for solid waste treatment facilities. Waste Manag Res 24:310–322
Troschinetz A, Mihelcic J (2009) Sustainable recycling of municipal solid waste in developing countries. Waste Manag 29(2):915–923
Tuhkanen S, Pipatti R, Sipilä K, Mäkinen T (2000) The effect of new solid waste treatment systems of greenhouse gas emissions. 5th international conference on greenhouse gas control technologies (GHGT-5), Cairns, Australia
Unnikrishnan S, Singh A (2010) Energy recovery in solid waste management through CDM in India and other countries. Resour Conserv Recycl 54(10):630–640
Williams P (2005) Waste treatment and disposal, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tolis, A., Rentizelas, A., Aravossis, K., Tatsiopoulos, I. (2012). Decisions Under Uncertainty in Municipal Solid Waste Cogeneration Investments. In: Karagiannidis, A. (eds) Waste to Energy. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2306-4_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2306-4_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-2305-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-2306-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)