Abstract
In recent years, we have seen the emergence of robotic technologies that focus on assisting individuals during overground gait and balance therapy following neurological injury and diseases. These devices range in complexity, depending on the type of assistance they provide. For example, at the single joint level, exoskeletons are now being used to supplement limb propulsion as a means of compensating for weakness and poor coordination. At the whole-body level, active body-weight support systems are being used to enhance postural stability as well as compensate for bilateral weakness during gait and balance training.
One of the key aspects of using robots that support overground gait and balance training is that they allow individuals the ability to practice the types of activities they will need to be competent in before returning to their home and into the community. The ability to walk overground, practice standing up and sitting down, and other functional tasks are critical components of achieving functional independence yet are often difficult to safely practice for patients with significant levels of impairment. Not only is the patient at risk for injury but so too is the therapist. The integration of robotic technologies into neurorehabilitation can play a critical role in the safe and effective delivery of gait and balance therapy.
The focus of this chapter is to present some of the newest robotic technologies that support overground gait and balance training, discuss the potential advantages and disadvantages of each, and provide a framework for how each may be useful in the clinical setting. Since the area of rehabilitation robotics is quickly expanding with many devices being developed in laboratories around the world, it is not possible for us to detail every technology. Instead, we will highlight a few of the devices and use them for providing a rationale for their usefulness in neurorehabilitation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Neckel N, Nichols D, Pelliccio M, Hidler J. Abnormal synergy patterns and weakness in individuals with chronic stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2006;3:17.
Hidler J, Carroll M, Federovich E. Strength and coordination in the paretic leg of individuals following acute stroke. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2007;15(4):526–34.
Olney SJ, Richards C. Hemiparetic gait following stroke. Part I: characteristics. Gait Posture. 1996;4:136–48.
Arene N, Hidler J. Understanding motor impairment in the paretic lower limb after stroke: a review of the literature. Top Stroke. 2009;16(5):346–56.
Sawicki GS, Ferris DP. Powered ankle exoskeletons reveal metabolic cost of plantar flexor mechanical work during walking with longer steps at constant step frequency. J Exp Biol. 2009;212:21–31.
Roy A, Krebs HI, Williams DJ, et al. Robot-aided neurorehabilitation: a novel robot for ankle rehabilitation. IEEE Trans Robot. 2009;3:569–82.
Khanna I, Roy A, Rodgers M, Krebs HI, Macko RM, Forrester LW. Effects of unilateral robotic limb loading on gait characteristics in subjects with chronic stroke. J Neuro Eng Rehabil. 2010;7:23.
Forrester LW, Roy A, Krebs HI, Macko RF. Ankle training with a robotic device improves hemiparetic gait after a stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011;25(4):369–77.
Ferris DP, Sawicki GS, Domingo A. Powered lower limb orthoses for gait rehabilitation. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2005;11:34–49.
Ferris DP, Gordon KE, Sawicki GS, Peethambaran A. An improved powered ankle-foot orthosis using proportional myoelectric control. Gait Posture. 2006;23(4):425–8.
Sawicki GS, Ferris DP. A pneumatically powered knee-ankle-foot orthosis (KAFO) with myoelectric activation and inhibition. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2009;6:23.
Cain SM, Gordon KE, Ferris DP. Locomotor adaptation to a powered ankle-foot orthosis depends on control method. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2007;4:48.
Veneman JF, Kruidhof R, Hekman EEG, Ekkelenkamp R, Van Asseldonk EHF, van der Kooij H. Design and evaluation of the LOPES exoskeleton robot for interactive gait rehabilitation. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2007;15(3):379–86.
Banala SK, Kulpe A, Agrawal SK. A powered leg orthosis for gait rehabilitation of motor-impaired patients. In: IEEE international conference of robotics and automation. Rome; 2007.
Kazerooni H, Steger R. The Berkeley lower extremity exoskeleton. Trans ASME. 2006;128:14–25.
Dobkin B, Apple D, Barbeau H, Basso M, Behrman A, Deforge D, et al. Scott M and the Spinal Cord Injury Locomotor Trial (SCILT) Group. Weight-supported treadmill vs over-ground training for walking after acute incomplete SCI. Neurology. 2006;66:484–93.
Keith RA, Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Sherwin FS. The functional independence measure: a new tool for rehabilitation. Adv Clin Rehabil. 1987;1:6–18.
Field-Fote EC, Lindley SD, Sherman AL. Locomotor training approaches for individuals with spinal cord injury: a preliminary report on walking related outcomes. J Neuro PT. 2005;29(3):127–37.
Hidler J, Nichols D, Pelliccio M, Brady K, Campbell D, Kahn J, et al. Multi-center randomized clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness of the Lokomat in sub-acute stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009;23(1):5–13.
Sawicki GS, Ferris DP. A pneumatically powered knee-ankle-foot orthosis (KAFO) with myoelectric activation and inhibition. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2009;23:6–23.
Veneman JF, Kruidhof R, Hekman EEG, et al. Design and evaluation of the LOPES exoskeleton robot for interactive gait rehabilitation. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2007;15(3):379–86.
Patton J, Lewis E, Crombie G, Peshkin M, Colgate E, Santos J, et al. A novel robotic device to enhance balance and mobility training post-stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2008;15:131–9.
Peshkin MA, Colgate JE, Wannasuphoprasit W, et al. Cobot architecture. IEEE Trans Robot Automation. 2001;17:377–90.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hidler, J.M., Brown, D.A. (2012). Robotic Devices for Overground Gait and Balance Training. In: Dietz, V., Nef, T., Rymer, W. (eds) Neurorehabilitation Technology. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2277-7_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2277-7_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-2276-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-2277-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)