Warehouse Assessment in a Single Tour



Over the last decades, many companies have offshored manufacturing activities to Asia Pacific and Eastern Europe. Since the consuming markets have not moved, this has put an increasing burden on the distribution operations of such companies. Companies have centralized warehouse operations in few, but often large facilities responsible for distributing products over a large region. Managing efficiency and effectiveness (service) is a great challenge for managers of such facilities. As a result, they feel a great need to benchmark warehouse operations, not only their own, but also their competitors’. However, assessing the performance of a distribution facility is a tricky business. Even after having visited a large number of them, it is still difficult to tell after a visit, whether this was a best-in-class operation, just above average or even relatively poor performing. Nevertheless, even short tour visits can reveal a lot of information to the trained eye. This paper proposes a method to help managers getting more information from tour visits, through a simple and rapid assessment form. The form should be filled out immediately after the visit. The evaluation has been inspired by the ideas of Gene Goodson in Harvard Business Review on rapid plant assessment (Goodson (2002) Harvard Business Review, 3–11 May). Since its development, the method has been successfully applied in several visits, with different groups of managers (with and without warehouse experience) and students.


Data Envelopment Analysis Mobile Terminal Customer Order Order Line Logistics Service Provider 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Bartholdi JJ, Eisenstein DD (1996) A production line that balances itself. Oper Res 44(1):21–34CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartholdi JJ, Bunimovich LA, Eisenstein DD (2000) Dynamics of two- and three-worker “bucket brigade” production lines. Oper Res 47(93):488–491Google Scholar
  3. Chen C-M, Gong Y, De Koster MBM, Van Nunen JAEE (2010) A flexible evaluate system for order picking systems. Prod Oper Man 19(1):70--82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. De Koster MBM, Balk B (2008) Benchmarking and monitoring international warehouse operations in Europe. Prod Oper Man 17(2):175--183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Faber N, de Koster MBM, van de Velde SL (2002) Linking warehouse complexity to warehouse planning and control structure. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 32:381–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Goodson RE (2002) Read a plant—fast. Harvard Business Review, 3–11 MayGoogle Scholar
  7. Hackman ST, Frazelle EH, Griffin PM, Griffin SO, Vlatsa DA (2001) Benchmarking warehousing and distribution operations: an input–output approach. J Prod Anal 16:79–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. McGinnis LF, Chen W-C, Grifffin PM, Sharp GP, Govindaraj T, Bodner DA (2002) Benchmarking warehouse performance: initial results for internet-based data envelopment analysis for warehousing (iDEAs-W 1.0), In: Progress in Material Handling Research: 2002, Material Handling Institute, Charlotte, pp 205–224Google Scholar
  9. Tompkins J et al (2003) Facilities planning. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus UniversityRotterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations