Skip to main content

Benign Endocervical Glandular Lesions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 802 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter covers the many benign endocervical glandular lesions, some of which may mimic premalignant and malignant endocervical glandular lesions. Benign endocervical glandular lesions can be broadly divided into four groups, metaplasias and ectopias of endocervical glands, endocervical glandular “hyperplasias”, reactive and inflammatory lesions and benign glandular neoplasms. The differential diagnosis with premalignant and malignant endocervical glandular lesions and the value of immunohistochemistry is discussed where appropriate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Young RH, Clement PB. Pseudoneoplastic glandular lesions of the uterine cervix. Semin Diagn Pathol. 1991;8:234–49.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. McCluggage WG. Glandular lesions of the uterine cervix. Curr Diagn Pathol. 2000;6:1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. McCluggage WG. Endocervical glandular lesions: controversial aspects and ancillary techniques. J Clin Pathol. 2003;56:164–73.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Baker PM, Clement PB, Bell DA, Young RH. Superficial endometriosis of the uterine cervix: a report of 20 cases of a process that may be confused with endocervical glandular dysplasia or adenocarcinoma in situ. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1999;18:198–205.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hoogduin KJ, Hopman AN, Ramaekers FC, McCluggage WG, Smedts F. BCL2 and keratin 5 define the uterine-cervix-isthmus junction, a transition between endocervical and tubal-like epithelium. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2013;32:122–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Oliva E, Clement PB, Young RH. Tubal and tubo-endometrioid metaplasia of the uterine cervix. Unemphasized features that may cause problems in differential diagnosis: a report of 25 cases. Am J Clin Pathol. 1995;103:618–23.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ismail SM. Cone biopsy causes cervical endometriosis and tubo-endometrioid metaplasia. Histopathology. 1991;18:107–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Al-Nafussi AI, Rahilly M. The prevalence of tubo-endometrial metaplasia and adenomatoid proliferation. Histopathology. 1993;22:177–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. McCluggage WG, Oliva E, Herrington CS, McBride H, Young RH. CD10 and calretinin staining of endocervical glandular lesions, endocervical stroma and endometrioid adenocarcinomas of the uterine corpus: CD10 positivity is characteristic of, but not specific for, mesonephric lesions and is not specific for endometrial stroma. Histopathology. 2003;43:144–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sumathi VP, McCluggage WG. CD10 is useful in demonstrating endometrial stroma at ectopic sites and in confirming a diagnosis of endometriosis. J Clin Pathol. 2002;55:391–2.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Vang R, Vinh TN, Burks RT, et al. Pseudoinfiltrative tubal metaplasia of the endocervix: a potential form of in utero diethylstilbestrol exposure-related adenosis simulating minimal deviation adenocarcinoma. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2005;24:391–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Schlesinger C, Silverberg SG. Endocervical adenocarcinoma in situ of tubal type and its relation to atypical tubal metaplasia. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1999;18:1–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cameron RI, Maxwell P, Jenkins D, McCluggage WG. Immunohistochemical staining with MIB1, bcl2 and p16 assists in the distinction of cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia from tubo-endometrial metaplasia, endometriosis and microglandular hyperplasia. Histopathology. 2002;41:313–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. McCluggage WG, Maxwell P, McBride HA, Hamilton PW, Bharucha H. Monoclonal antibodies Ki-67 and MIB1 in the distinction of tuboendometrial metaplasia from endocervical adenocarcinoma and adenocarcinoma in situ in formalin-fixed material. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1995;14:209–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. McCluggage G, McBride H, Maxwell P, Bharucha H. Immunohistochemical detection of p53 and bcl-2 proteins in neoplastic and non-neoplastic endocervical glandular lesions. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1997;16:22–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Marques T, Andrade LA, Vassallo J. Endocervical tubal metaplasia and adenocarcinoma in situ: role of immunohistochemistry for carcinoembryonic antigen and vimentin in differential diagnosis. Histopathology. 1996;28:549–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Stewart CJ, Little L. Diagnostic value and implications of vimentin expression in normal, reactive and neoplastic endocervical epithelium. Pathology. 2010;42:217–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Jones MA, Young RH. Atypical oxyphilic metaplasia of the endocervical epithelium: a report of six cases. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1997;16:99–102.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. McCluggage WG, Shah R, Connolly LE, McBride HA. Intestinal-type cervical adenocarcinoma in situ and adenocarcinoma exhibit a partial immunophenotype with consistent expression of CDX2. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2008;27:92–100.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Nicolae A, Goyenaga P, McCluggage WG, Preda O, Nogales FF. Endometrial intestinal metaplasia: a report of two cases, including one associated with cervical intestinal and pyloric metaplasia. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2011;30:492–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Moore WF, Bentley RC, Kim KR, Olatidoye B, Gray SR, Robboy SJ. Goblet-cell mucinous epithelium lining the endometrium and endocervix: evidence of metastasis from an appendiceal primary tumor through the use of cytokeratin-7 and −20 immunostains. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1998;17:363–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mikami Y, McCluggage WG. Endocervical glandular lesions exhibiting gastric differentiation: an emerging spectrum of benign, premalignant and malignant lesions. Adv Anat Pathol. 2013;20:227–37.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhao S, Hayasaka T, Osakabe M, et al. Mucin expression in nonneoplastic and neoplastic glandular epithelia of the uterine cervix. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2003;22:393–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nucci MR, Young RH. Arias-Stella reaction of the endocervix: a report of 18 cases with emphasis on its varied histology and differential diagnosis. Am J Surg Pathol. 2004;28:608–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Young RH, Clement PB. Endocervicosis involving the uterine cervix: a report of four cases of a benign process that may be confused with deeply invasive endocervical adenocarcinoma. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2000;19:322–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Clement PB, Young RH. Endocervicosis of the urinary bladder: a report of six cases of a benign Mullerian lesion that may mimic adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 1992;16:533–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. McCluggage WG, Price JH, Dobbs SP. Primary adenocarcinoma of the vagina arising in endocervicosis. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2001;20:399–402.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Clement PB, Young RH. Florid cystic endosalpingiosis with tumor-like manifestations: a report of four cases including the first reported cases of transmural endosalpingiosis of the uterus. Am J Surg Pathol. 1999;23:166–75.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Nucci MR, Ferry JA, Young RH. Ectopic prostatic tissue in the uterine cervix: a report of four cases and review of ectopic prostatic tissue. Am J Surg Pathol. 2000;24:1224–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. McCluggage WG, Ganesan R, Hirschowitz L, Miller K, Rollason TP. Ectopic prostatic tissue in the uterine cervix and vagina: report of a series with a detailed immunohistochemical analysis. Am J Surg Pathol. 2006;30:209–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kelly P, McBride HA, Kennedy K, Connolly LE, McCluggage WG. Misplaced Skene’s glands: glandular elements in the lower female genital tract that are variably immunoreactive with prostate markers and that encompass vaginal tubulosquamous polyp and cervical ectopic prostatic tissue. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2011;30:605–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. McCluggage WG, Young RH. Tubulo-squamous polyp: a report of ten cases of a distinctive hitherto uncharacterized vaginal polyp. Am J Surg Pathol. 2007;31:1013–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kazakov DV, Stewart CJ, Kacerovska D, et al. Prostatic-type tissue in the lower female genital tract: a morphologic spectrum, including vaginal tubulosquamous polyp, adenomyomatous hyperplasia of paraurethral Skene glands (female prostate), and ectopic lesion in the vulva. Am J Surg Pathol. 2010;34:950–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kazakov DV, Hejda V, Kacerovska D, Michal M. Hyperplasia of ectopic sebaceous glands in the uterine cervix: case report. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2010;29:605–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Robledo MC, Vazquez JJ, Contreras-Mejuto F, et al. Sebaceous glands and hair follicles in the cervix uteri. Histopathology. 1992;21:278–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Kazakov DV, Mukensnabl P, Kacerovska D, Michal M. Mantle structures in the uterine cervix. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2009;28:568–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Belousova IE, Kazakov DV, Michal M. Ectopic sebaceous glands in the vagina. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2005;24:193–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Brady AJ, McCluggage WG. Ectodermal structures within the uterine cervix and vagina: report of a series of cases. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2013;32:602–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Fluhmann CF. Focal hyperplasias (tunnel clusters) of the cervix uteri. Obstet Gynecol. 1961;17:206–14.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Jones MA, Young RH. Endocervical type A (noncystic) tunnel clusters with cytologic atypia. A report of 14 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 1996;20:1312–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Segal GH, Hart WR. Cystic endocervical tunnel clusters. A clinicopathologic study of 29 cases of so-called adenomatous hyperplasia. Am J Surg Pathol. 1990;14:895–903.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Tambouret R, Bell DA, Young RH. Microcystic endocervical adenocarcinomas: a report of eight cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2000;24:369–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Kondo T, Hashi A, Murata SI, et al. Gastric mucin is expressed in a subset of endocervical tunnel clusters: type A tunnel clusters of gastric phenotype. Histopathology. 2007;50:843–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. McCluggage WG. New developments in endocervical glandular lesions. Histopathology. 2013;62:138–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Nucci MR, Clement PB, Young RH. Lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia, not otherwise specified: a clinicopathologic analysis of thirteen cases of a distinctive pseudoneoplastic lesion and comparison with fourteen cases of adenoma malignum. Am J Surg Pathol. 1999;23:886–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Mikami Y, Hata S, Melamed J, et al. Lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia is a metaplastic process with a pyloric gland phenotype. Histopathology. 2001;39:364–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Mikami Y, Kiyokawa T, Moriya T, Sasano H. Immunophenotypic alteration of the stromal component in minimal deviation adenocarcinoma (‘adenoma malignum’) and endocervical glandular hyperplasia: a study using oestrogen receptor and alpha-smooth muscle actin double immunostaining. Histopathology. 2005;46:130–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Hayashi I, Tsuda H, Shimoda T. Reappraisal of orthodox histochemistry for the diagnosis of minimal deviation adenocarcinoma of the cervix. Am J Surg Pathol. 2000;24:559–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Ichimura T, Koizumi T, Tateiwa H, et al. Immunohistochemical expression of gastric mucin and p53 in minimal deviation adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2001;20:220–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Toki T, Shiozawa T, Hosaka N, Ishii K, Nikaido T, Fujii S. Minimal deviation adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix has abnormal expression of sex steroid receptors, CA125, and gastric mucin. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1997;16:111–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Utsugi K, Hirai Y, Takeshima N, et al. Utility of the monoclonal antibody HIK1083 in the diagnosis of adenoma malignum of the uterine cervix. Gynecol Oncol. 1999;75:345–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Mikami Y, Kiyokawa T, Hata S, Fujiwara K, Moriya T, Sasano H, et al. Gastrointestinal immunophenotype in adenocarcinomas of the uterine cervix and related glandular lesions: a possible link between lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia/pyloric gland metaplasia and ‘adenoma malignum’. Mod Pathol. 2004;17:962–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Nara M, Hashi A, Murata S, et al. Lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia as a presumed precursor of cervical adenocarcinoma independent of human papillomavirus infection. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;106:289–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Kawauchi S, Ksuda T, Liu XO, et al. Is lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia a cancerous precursor of minimal deviation adenocarcinoma? : a comparative molecular-genetic and immunohistochemical study. Am J Surg Pathol. 2008;32:1807–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Mikami Y, Kiyokawa T, Sasajima Y, et al. Reapprasial of synchronous and multifocal mucinous lesions of the female genital tract: a close association with gastric metaplasia. Histopathology. 2009;54:184–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Seidman JD. Mucinous lesions of the fallopian tube. Am J Surg Pathol. 1994;18:1205–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Young RH, Scully RE. Mucinous tumors of the ovary associated with mucinous adenocarcinomas of the cervix. A clinicopathologic analysis of 16 cases. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1988;7:99–111.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Jones MA, Young RH, Scully RE. Diffuse laminar endocervical glandular hyperplasia. A benign lesion often confused with adenoma malignum (minimal deviation adenocarcinoma). Am J Surg Pathol. 1991;15:1123–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Daya D, Young RH. Florid deep glands of the uterine cervix. Another mimic of adenoma malignum. Am J Clin Pathol. 1995;103:614–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Clement PB, Young RH. Deep nabothian cysts of the uterine cervix. A possible source of confusion with minimal-deviation adenocarcinoma (adenoma malignum). Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1989;8:340–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Greeley C, Schroeder S, Silverberg SG. Microglandular hyperplasia of the cervix: a true “pill” lesion? Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1995;14:50–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Speers WC, Picaso LG, Silverberg SG. Immunohistochemical localization of carcinoembryonic antigen in microglandular hyperplasia and adenocarcinoma of the endocervix. Am J Clin Pathol. 1983;79:105–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Young RH, Scully RE. Atypical forms of microglandular hyperplasia of the cervix simulating carcinoma. A report of five cases and review of the literature. Am J Surg Pathol. 1989;13:50–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Jacques SM, Qureshi F, Lawrence WD. Surface epithelial changes in endometrial adenocarcinoma: diagnostic pitfalls in curettage specimens. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1995;14:191–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Chekmareva M, Ellenson LH, Pirog EC. Immunohistochemical differences between mucinous and microglandular adenocarcinomas of the endometrium and benign endocervical epithelium. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2008;27:547–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Qui W, Mittal K. Comparison of morphologic and immunohistochemical features of cervical microglandular hyperplasia with low-grade mucinous adenocarcinoma of the endometrium. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2003;22:261–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. McCluggage WG. A critical appraisal of the value of immunohistochemistry in diagnosis of uterine neoplasms. Adv Anat Pathol. 2004;11:162–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Seidman JD, Tavassoli FA. Mesonephric hyperplasia of the uterine cervix: a clinicopathologic study of 51 cases. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1995;14:293–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Ordi J, Ramagosa C, Tavassoli FA. CD10 expression in epithelial tissues and tumors of the gynecologic tract. Am J Surg Pathol. 2003;27:178–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Devouassoux-Shisheboran M, Silver SA, Tavassoli FA. Wolffian adnexal tumor, so-called female adnexal tumor of probable Wolffian origin (FATWO): immunohistochemical evidence in support of a Wolffian origin. Hum Pathol. 1999;30:856–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Rabban JT, McAlhany S, Lerwill MF, Grenert JP, Zaloudek CJ. PAX2 distinguishes benign mesonephric and mullerian glandular lesions of the cervix from endocervical adenocarcinoma, including minimal deviation adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2010;34:137–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Kenny SL, McBride HA, Jamison J, McCluggage WG. Mesonephric adenocarcinomas of the uterine cervix and corpus: HPV negative neoplasms which are commonly PAX8, CA125 and HMGA2 positive and which may be immunoreactive with TTF1 and Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor 1 Beta. Am J Surg Pathol. 2012;36:799–807.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Truskinovsky AM, Stelow EB, Jessurun J, et al. Staining for p16 of cervical mesonephric remnants and hyperplasia: A potential diagnostic pitfall. Mod Pathol. 2006;19:199A.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Clement PB, Young RH, Keh P, Ostor AG, Scully RE. Malignant mesonephric neoplasms of the uterine cervix. A report of eight cases, including four with a malignant spindle cell component. Am J Surg Pathol. 1995;19:1158–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Brainard JA, Hart WR. Adenoid basal epitheliomas of the uterine cervix. A reevaluation of distinctive cervical basaloid lesions currently classified as adenoid basal carcinoma and adenoid basal hyperplasia. Am J Surg Pathol. 1998;22:965–75.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Al-Nafussi A. Histopathological challenges in assessing invasion in squamous and glandular neoplasia of the cervix. Curr Diagn Pathol. 2006;12:364–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Howitt BE, Quade BJ, Nucci MR. Atypical uterine polyps sub-diagnostic of Mullerian adenosarcoma: a clinicopathologic analysis of 28 cases with long term follow-up. Mod Pathol. 2012;25 Suppl 2:1159.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Heatley MK. Squamous intraepithelial lesions arising in benign endocervical polyps: a report of 9 cases with correlation to the pap smears, HPV analysis, and immunoprofile. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2009;28:567.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Ilhan R, Yavuz E, Iplikci A, et al. Hamartomatous endocervical polyp with heterologous mesenchymal tissue. Pathol Int. 2001;51:305–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Siddon A, Hui P. Glial heterotopia of the uterine cervix: DNA genotyping confirmation of its fetal origin. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2010;29:394–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Kiviat NB, Paavonen JA, Wolner-Hanssen P, et al. Histopathology of endocervical infection caused by Chlamydia trachomatis, herpes simplex virus, Trichomonas vaginalis, and Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Hum Pathol. 1990;21:831–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Lesack D, Wahab I, Gilks CB. Radiation-induced atypia of endocervical epithelium: A histologic, immunohistochemical and cytometric study. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1996;15:42–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. El-Bahrawy M. Expression of p16 in post-radiotherapy cervical biopsies. Histopathology. 2011;58:1174–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. McGalie CE, McBride HA, McCluggage WG. Cytomegalovirus infection of the cervix: morphological observations in five cases of a possibly under-recognised condition. J Clin Pathol. 2004;57:691–4.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Nagar HA, Dobbs SP, McClelland HR, et al. The large loop excision transformation zone cut or blend artefact study: a randomized control trial. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2004;14:1108–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. McKenna M, McCluggage WG. Signet ring cells of stromal derivation in the uterine cervix secondary to cauterisation: report of a previously undescribed phenomenon. J Clin Pathol. 2008;61:648–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Scott M, Lyness RW, McCluggage WG. Atypical reactive proliferation of endocervix: a common lesion associated with endometrial carcinoma and likely related to prior endometrial sampling. Mod Pathol. 2006;19:470–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Gilks CB, Young RH, Clement PB, Hart WR, Scully RE. Adenomyomas of the uterine cervix of endocervical type: a report of ten cases of a benign cervical tumor that may be confused with adenoma malignum [corrected]. Mod Pathol. 1996;9:220–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. Gilks CB, Clement PB, Hart WR, Young RH. Uterine adenomyomas excluding atypical polypoid adenomyomas and adenomyomas of endocervical type: a clinicopathologic study of 30 cases of an underemphasized lesion that may cause diagnostic problems with brief consideration of adenomyomas of other female genital tract sites. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2000;19:195–205.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Michael H, Sutton G, Hull MT, et al. Villous adenoma of the uterine cervix associated with invasive adenocarcinoma: A histologic, ultrastructural and immunohistochemical study. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1986;5:163–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Alvaro T, Nogales F. Villous adenoma and invasive adenocarcinoma of the cervix. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1988;7:96.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. McCluggage WG, Nirmala V, Radhakurami K. Intramural mullerian papilloma of the vagina. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1999;18:94–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. Lane BR, Ross JH, Wart WR, et al. Mullerian papilloma of the cervix in a child with multiple renal cysts. Urology. 2005;65:388.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Smith YR, Quint EH, Hinton EL. Recurrent benign mullerian papilloma of the cervix. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 1998;11:29–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. Dobbs SP, Shaw PA, Brown LJ, Ireland D. Borderline malignant change in recurrent müllerian papilloma of the vagina. J Clin Pathol. 1998;51:875–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McCluggage, W.G. (2014). Benign Endocervical Glandular Lesions. In: Cellular Pathology of Glandular Lesions and Uncommon Neoplasms of the Cervix. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2210-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2210-4_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-2209-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-2210-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics