Abstract
The paper examines the performance distribution for continuous-state systems that may be essentially different from Gaussian. Notable progress in understanding the nature of rare events and the implications for heavy-tailed distributions has been achieved in the last decade. The insights, however, even though they generated robust interest in such distributions, are not reflected strongly enough in reliability engineering practice. The paper presents four simple mechanisms of heavy-tail formation in reliability engineering contexts, their importance and the phenomena where they may appear. It also discusses the implications of this knowledge for optimization of quality controller performance.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bashkansky E, Netzer N (2006) The role of mediation in collisions and related analogs. Am J Phys 74(12):1083–1087
Champernowne D (1953) A model of income distribution. Econ J 63:318–351
Godfrey AB, Kenett RS (2007) Joseph M. Juran, a perspective on past contributions and future impact. Qual Reliab Eng Int 23(6):653–663
Juran JM (1950) Pareto, Lorenz, Cournot, Bernoulli. Juran and Others. Ind Qual Cont 17(4):25
Kenett RS, Tapiero C (2009) Quality, risk and the Taleb quadrants. Risk and Decision Anal 1(4):231–246
Li DX (2000) On default correlation: a copula function approach. J Fixed Income 9(4):43–54
Lisnianski A, Levitin G (2003) Multi-state system reliability: assessment, optimization and applications. Springer, London
Lisnianski A, Frenkel I, Ding Y (2010) Multi-state system reliability analysis and optimization for engineers and industrial managers. Springer, London
Mitzenmacher M (2004) A brief history of generative models for power law and lognormal distributions. Internet Math 1(2):226–251
Montgomery DC (2008) Introduction to statistical quality control. Wiley, NY
Newman MEJ (2005) Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf’s law. Contemp Phys 46(5):323–351
Nist/Sematech (2003) e-Handbook of statistical methods. U.S. Commerce Department’s Technology Administration. http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/
Park K, Kim G, Crovella ME (1997) On the effect of traffic self-similarity on network performance. In: Proceedings of the SPIE international conference on performance and control of network systems, Dallas TX, pp 296–310, 3–5 November 1997
Reynolds MR, Amin RW Jr, Arnold JC, Nachlas JA (1988) X-charts with variable sampling intervals. Technometrics 30(2):181–192
Shortle JF, Brill PH, Fischer MJ, Gross D, Masi DMB (2004) An algorithm to compute the waiting time distribution for the M/G/1 queue. INFORMS J Comp 16(2):152–161
Su C, Tang Q (2003) Characterizations on heavy-tailed distributions by means of hazard rate. Acta Math Applicatae Sinica (English Series) 19(1):135–142
Taleb N (2010) The black swan: the impact of the highly improbable. Random Home Publishing Group, NY
Yang K, Kapur KC (1997) Customer driven reliability: integration of QFD and robust design. In: Proceedings of annual reliability and maintainability IEEE symposium, Philadelphia, PA, pp 339–345
Zuo MJ, Renyan J, Yam RCM (1999) Approaches for reliability modelling of continuous-state devices. IEEE Trans Reliab 48(1):9–18
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bashkansky, E., Gadrich, T. (2012). Reliability of Continuous-State Systems in View of Heavy-Tailed Distributed Performance Features. In: Lisnianski, A., Frenkel, I. (eds) Recent Advances in System Reliability. Springer Series in Reliability Engineering. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2207-4_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2207-4_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-2206-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-2207-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)