Abstract
Teledermatology is the use of telecommunication for dermatology diagnosis and care. This technology can provide diagnostic services to underserved and rural regions that lack access to higher-level specialty medical expertise. Accumulating data shows that teledermatology is diagnostically accurate, safe, cost-effective, and well received by patients. While the potential of teledermatology to increase access to care is exciting, it is critical to recognize that the nature of the doctor–patient relationship is drastically altered when the doctor is located remotely, never having face-to-face contact with the patient. This is a new type of therapeutic relationship, one in which the principles of respect for autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice must be emphasized, and at the same time recontextualized. Case scenarios will be used to examine some of the ethical issues that may arise with the use of teledermatology. As a framework for our analysis, we will use the generally accepted ethical principles to which physicians are expected to adhere and will discuss how these principles apply specifically to challenging scenarios with which practitioners of teledermatology may be faced.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
American Academy of Dermatology Position Statements. Position statement on telemedicine. Updated 2004. http://www.aad.org/forms/policies/Uploads/PS/PS-Telemedicine%206-15-07.pdf. Accessed 21 Feb 2010.
Norton SA, Burdick AE, Phillips CM, Berman B. TeleÂdermatology and underserved populations. Arch Dermatol. 1997;133:197–200.
Pak H, Triplett CA, Lindquist JH, Grambow SC, Whited JD. Store-and-forward teledermatology results in similar clinical outcomes to conventional clinic-based care. J Telemed Telecare. 2007;13:26–30.
Grenier N, Bercovitch L, Long TP. Cyberdermatoethics II: a case-based approach to teledermatology ethics. Clin Dermatol. 2009;27:367–71.
American Medical Association. Code of medical ethics: E-10.015. The patient-physician relationship. Updated June 2001. http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/physician-resources/medical-ethics/code-medical-ethics.shtml. Accessed 6 Jan 2010.
Federation of the State Medical Boards of the United States, Inc. Model guidelines for the appropriate use of the internet in medical practice. Updated April 2002. http://www.fsmb.org/pdf/2002_grpol_Use_of_Internet.pdf. Accessed 6 Jan 2010.
Bovi AM, CEJA. Ethical guidelines for the use of electronic mail between patients and physicians. Am J Bioeth. 2003;3:W43–7.
Demiris G, Oliver DP, Courtney KL. Ethical considerations for the utilization of telehealth technologies in home and hospice care by the nursing profession. Nurs Adm Q. 2006;30:56–66.
Fleming D, Edison K, Pak H. Telehealth ethics. Telemed J E Health. 2009;15:797–803.
Fischer BA. A summary of important documents in the field of research ethics. Schizophr Bull. 2006;2:69–80.
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Office of the Secretary. Standards for privacy of individually identifiable health information; proposed rule. Fed Regist. 1999;64(212):59917–60016.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Weinberg, J.L., Gormley, R.H., Kovarik, C.L. (2012). The Computer Will See You Now: Ethics of Teledermatology. In: Bercovitch, L., Perlis, C. (eds) Dermatoethics. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2191-6_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2191-6_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-2190-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-2191-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)