Skip to main content

Feet of Clay: The Impaired Dermatologist

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Dermatoethics

Abstract

Dr. L is a senior partner in a large practice associated with an academic center and a professor of dermatology at the local medical school. Though not currently chair of the department, he has served in that role in the past. At a recent Christmas celebration for the department, he was observed to drink heavily throughout the evening. As the evening wore on, he became louder, more belligerent and began to slur his words. He was somewhat incoherent when he tried to provide a toast to the assembled group. Later, he drove himself home in his car. No one at the event confronted him or attempted to keep him from getting into his car at the end of the evening. A few days later, one of his partners tried to broach the evening’s events with Dr. L, saying that he was concerned about him. Dr. L became angry and defensive. He could not remember all the details of his behavior at the dinner, but was aware that he had “probably had a little too much” and “may have said some inopportune things.” He insisted he had just “had a good time like everyone else.” Nevertheless, he reluctantly agreed to apologize to some of his colleagues. When approached by Dr. L, they each quickly “let him off the hook,” laughing with him and dismissing his behavior as just “blowing off some steam.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Miller NM, McGowen RK. The painful truth: physicians are not invincible. South Med J. 2000;93:966–73.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lowen JT. Disruptive docs. Minn Med. 2011;94:16–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wall BW. Commentary: the clinical implications of doctors’ evaluating doctors. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2005;33:89–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pfefferling JH. Managing the unmanagable: the disruptive physician. Fam Pract Manag. 1997;4:77–92.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Murray A, Montgomery JE, Chang H, Rogers WH, Inui T, Safran DG. Doctor discontent. A comparison of physician satisfaction in different delivery system settings, 1986 and 1997. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16:452–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Dunn PM, Arnetz BB, Christensen JF, Homer L. Meeting the imperative to improve physician well-being: assessment of an innovative program. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:1544–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Williams ES, Konrad TR, Scheckler WE, Pathman DE, Linzer M, McMurray JE, et al. Understanding physicians’ intentions to withdraw from practice: the role of job satisfaction, job stress, mental and physical health. Health Care Manage Rev. 2001;26:7–19.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rollman BL, Mead LA, Wang NY, Klag MJ. Medical specialty and the incidence of divorce. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:800–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Center C, Davis M, Detre T, Ford DE, Hansbrough W, Hendin H, et al. Confronting depression and suicide in physicians: a consensus statement. JAMA. 2003;289:3161–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bayles M. Professional ethics. Belmont: Wadsworth; 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Code of Medical Ethics: current opinions with annotations. In: AMA CoEaJA, editor. Chicago, IL; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  12. MacIver RM. The social significance of professional ethics. In: Pirsig ME, editor. Cases and materials on professional responsibility. St. Paul, MN: West; 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  13. May W. Professional ethics: setting, terrain and teacher. In: Callahan D, Bok S, editors. Ethics teaching in higher education. New York: Plenum; 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gorovitz S. Doctor’s dilemmas: moral conflict and medical care. New York: Macmillan; 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Boisaubin EV, Levine RE. Identifying and assisting the impaired physician. Am J Med Sci. 2001;322:31–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Skipper GE. Treating the chemically dependent health professional. J Addict Dis. 1997;16:67–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Stoudemire A, Rhoades JM. When the doctor needs a doctor: special considerations for the physician-patient. Ann Intern Med. 1983;98:654–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Baldisseri MR. Impaired healthcare professional. Crit Care Med. 2007;35:S106–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Current trends smoking-related mortality decline among physicians - Rhode Island. Morbidity and mortality weekly report: centers for disease control and prevention; 1990. p. 656–8.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nelson DE, Giovino GA, Emont SL, Brackbill R, Cameron LL, Peddicord J, et al. Trends in cigarette smoking among US physicians and nurses. JAMA. 1994;271:1273–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Fox DM. Commentary: impaired physicians and the new politics of accountability. Acad Med. 2009;84:692–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bohigian GM, Croughan JL, Sanders K. Substance abuse and dependence in physicians: an overview of the effects of alcohol and drug abuse. Mo Med. 1994;91:233–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Holmes VF, Rich CL. Suicide among physicians. In: Blumental S, Kupfer D, editors. Suicide over the life cycle: risk factors, assessment, and treatment of suicidal patients. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, Inc; 1990. p. 599–615.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Silverman M. Physicians and suicide. In: Goldman LS, Myers M, Dickstein LJ, editors. The handbook of physician health: essential guide to understanding the health care needs of physicians. Chicago: American Medical Association; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lindeman S, Laara E, Hakko H, Lonnqvist J. A systematic review on gender-specific suicide mortality in medical doctors. Br J Psychiatry. 1996;168:274–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Hawton K, Clements A, Sakarovitch C, Simkin S, Deeks JJ. Suicide in doctors: a study of risk according to gender, seniority and specialty in medical practitioners in England and Wales, 1979–1995. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001;55:296–300.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Hampton T. Experts address risk of physician suicide. JAMA. 2005;294:1189–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Yao DC, Wright SM. The challenge of problem residents. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16:486–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Steinert Y, Levitt C. Working with the “problem” resident: guidelines for definition and intervention. Fam Med. 1993;25:627–32.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Gordon MJ. A prerogatives-based model for assessing and managing the resident in difficulty. Fam Med. 1993;25:637–45.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. The sick physician. Impairment by psychiatric disorders, including alcoholism and drug dependence. JAMA. 1973;223:684–7.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Federation of State Physician Health Programs.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Public Policy Statement: physician illness vs. impairment: Federation of State Physician Health Programs.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Bohigian GM, Bondurant R, Croughan J. The impaired and disruptive physician: the Missouri Physicians’ Health Program–an update (1995–2002). J Addict Dis. 2005;24:13–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Rakatansky H. Physician suicide. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:1184–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Nye GS. Psychiatric evaluation for diversion program candidates. Fed Bull. 1996;83:95–101.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wettstein RM. Commentary: quality improvement and psychiatric fitness-for-duty evaluations of physicians. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2005;33:92–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Wall BW, Appelbaum KL. Disabled doctors: the insurance industry seeks a second opinion. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1998;26:7–19.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Nicholson RA, Norwood S. The quality of forensic psychological assessments, reports, and testimony: acknowledging the gap between promise and practice. Law Hum Behav. 2000;24:9–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Skeem JL, Golding SL, Cohn NB, Berge G. Logic and ­reliability of evaluations of competence to stand trial. Law Hum Behav. 1998;22:519–47.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Anfang SA, Faulkner LR, Fromson JA, Gendel MH. The American Psychiatric Association’s resource document on guidelines for psychiatric fitness-for-duty evaluations of physicians. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2005;33:85–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Brodsky CM. Psychiatric aspects of fitness for duty. Occup Med. 1996;11:719–26.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Jansen M, Bell LB, Sucher MA, et al. Detection of alcohol use in monitored aftercare programs: a national survey of state physician health programs. J Med Licens Discipl. 2004;90:8–13.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Skipper GE, Weinmann W, Wurst FM. Ethylglucuronide (ETG): a new marker to detect alcohol use in recovering physicians. J Med Licens Discipl. 2004;90:14–7.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Weintraub W. “The Vip Syndrome”: a clinical study in hospital psychiatry. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1964;138:181–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Meffert JJ. “I swear!” Physician oaths and their current relevance. Clin Dermatol. 2009;27:411–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Physician Characteristics. In: Smart DR, editor. Physician characteristics and distribution in the US. Washington, DC: American Medical Association; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  48. LoboPrabhu SM, Molinari VA, Hamilton JD, Lomax JW. The aging physician with cognitive impairment: approaches to oversight, prevention, and remediation. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2009;17:445–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Weycker DA, Jensen GA. Medical malpractice among physicians: who will be sued and who will pay? Health Care Manag Sci. 2000;3:269–77.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Kohatsu ND, Gould D, Ross LK, Fox PJ. Characteristics associated with physician discipline: a case-control study. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:653–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Morrison J, Wickersham P. Physicians disciplined by a state medical board. JAMA. 1998;279:1889–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Pesiah C, Wilhelm K. Physician don’t heal thyself: a descriptive study of impaired older doctors. Int Psychogeriatr. 2007;19:974–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Eva KW. The aging physician: changes in cognitive processing and their impact on medical practice. Acad Med. 2002;77:S1–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Pesiah C, Wilhelm K. The impaired aging doctor. Intern Med J. 2002;32:457–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Brown SD, Goske MJ, Johnson CM. Beyond substance abuse: stress, burnout, and depression as causes of physician impairment and disruptive behavior. J Am Coll Radiol. 2009;6:479–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Papadakis MA, Hodgson CS, Teherani A, Kohatsu ND. Unprofessional behavior in medical school is associated with subsequent disciplinary action by a state medical board. Acad Med. 2004;79:244–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Papadakis MA, Teherani A, Banach MA, Knettler TR, Rattner SL, Stern DT, et al. Disciplinary action by medical boards and prior behavior in medical school. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:2673–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Stern DT, Frohna AZ, Gruppen LD. The prediction of professional behaviour. Med Educ. 2005;39:75–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Joint Commission Sentinel Event Alert: behaviors that undermine and issue of safety: Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. www.jointcommission.org/sentinel_event_alert_issue_40_behaviors_that_undermine_a_culture_of_safety/. Accessed 13 Jun 2011.

  60. Youssi MD. JCAHO standards help address disruptive physician behavior. Physician Exec. 2002;28:12–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Leadership in healthcare organizations: A guide to Joint Commission healthcare standards: Governance Institute. http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:y1IPRWvW_WwJ:www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/18/WP_Leadership_Standards.pdf+Leadership+in+healthcare+organizations:+A+guide+to+Joint+Commission+healthcare+standards:+Governance+Institute.&hl=en&gl=us&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESgeSb1oqBNrKnznqMdZWPLVp2JjsWvep1QP_XI2w21QuCRFuhBgELRWxlIB9eMVyDz1atu45l1Uwzo6cooFdxsbE0vmh-FjIh1KXymPy_HjNEJaLIE0g-m1ywDITrT6SLzqMoDk&sig=AHIEtbQhZxkm_UbG6qwTMTTfHiWWOI01Aw. Accessed 13 June 2011.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brandon H. Krupp .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Krupp, B.H. (2012). Feet of Clay: The Impaired Dermatologist. In: Bercovitch, L., Perlis, C. (eds) Dermatoethics. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2191-6_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2191-6_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-2190-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-2191-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics