Low-Level Dimensional Metrology Process Planning and Execution

  • Yaoyao (Fiona) Zhao
  • Robert Brown
  • Thomas R. Kramer
  • Xun Xu
Chapter

Abstract

For enterprise quality control, it is more sensible and pragmatic to generate a device-independent measurement plan (from the high-level measurement process planning activity) rather than a device-dependent one. The reason is because the workshops or factories may have different types of measurement devices with different measuring capabilities. The device-independent measurement plan will then give certain freedom to the shopfloor to choose available measurement devices. In industry, the dividing line between high-level and low-level measurement planning activity is vague. Generally speaking, the choice of measurement device for a particular measurement plan represents the starting point of low-level dimensional measurement planning activity. Also, measurement plan execution is tightly linked with the low-level measurement planning. Often when the low-level measurement plan.

Keywords

Welding Transportation Mold Milling Editing 

References

  1. 1.
    Usher MJ (1985) Sensors and transducers. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Whitehouse DJ (1994) Handbook of surface metrology. IOP, BristolGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schmalz G (1929) Zeitschrift. VDI. 73:144–161Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Whitehouse DJ et al (1994) Gloss and surface topography. CIRP Ann—Manuf Technol 43(2):541–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tönshoff HK, Inasaki I (2001) Sensors in manufacturing sensors applications. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH, WeinheimCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barkman WE (1989) In-process quality control for manufacturing. M. Dekker, New YorkMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sze SM (1994) Semiconductor sensors. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shiraishi M (1988) Scope of in-process measurement, monitoring and control techniques in machining processes-Part 1: In-process techniques for tools. Precis Eng 10(4):179–189MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shiraishi M (1989) Scope of in-process measurement, monitoring and control techniques in machining processes-Part 3: In-process techniques for cutting processes and machine tools. Precis Eng 11(1):39–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shiraishi M (1989) Scope of in-process measurement, monitoring and control techniques in machining processes-Part 2: In-process techniques for workpieces. Precis Eng 11(1):27–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yandayan T, Burdekin M (1997) In-process dimensional measurement and control of workpiece accuracy. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 37(10):1423–1439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vacharanukul K, Mekid S (2005) In-process dimensional inspection sensors. Measurement. J Int Meas Confed 38(3):204–218Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Barkman WE (2000) In-process measurement. In: Richard ELH, Shell L (eds) Handbook of industrial automation. Marcel Dekker, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gu P, Chan K (1996) Generative inspection process and probe path planning for coordinate measuring machines. J Manuf Syst 15(4):240–255MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Medeiros DJ et al (1994) Off-line programming of coordinate measuring machines using a hand-held stylus. J Manuf Syst 13(6):401–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schaffer GH (1982) Taking the measure of CMMs. Am Mach 126:145–160Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kurfess TR (2006) What can CMMs do? Manuf Eng 136(3):173Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Spitz SN (1999) Dimensional inspection planning for coordinate measuring machines. Department of Computer Science, University of Southern CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    ANSI (1994) ASME Y14.5 M-1994: Dimensioning and TolerancingGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Destefani JD (2001) CMMs make contact. Manuf Eng 127(3):100–105Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sheehan K (1993) Measurement verifies machine performance. Mod Mac Shop 66(5):76Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Weckenmann A, Kraemer P, Hoffmann J (2007) Manufacturing metrology-state of the art and prospects. In: 9th international symposium on measurement and quality control, ISMQC-ProceedingsGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rakowski LR (1996) Portable CMMs: affordable accuracy. Foundry Manag Technol 124(2):29MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dove J, Schueneman D (2005) Portable or fixed-position CMM? Manuf Eng 135(1):53–55Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Eaton H (1994) How to buy a portable CMM. Tool Prod. 60(3)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Logee S (2004) On-machine measurement. Tool Prod 70(10):40–43Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kim KD, Chung SC (2001) Synthesis of the measurement system on the machine tool. Int J Prod Res 39(11):2475–2497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kamath R (2000) On-Machine Inspection and Acceptance (OMIA). University of Missouri-Rolla, USAGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cho MW et al (2004) A computer-aided inspection planning system for on-machine measurement-Part II: Local inspection planning. KSME Int J 18(8):1358–1367Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lee H, Cho MW, Yoon GS, Choi JH (2004) A computer-aided inspection planning system for on-machine measurement-Part I: Global inspection planning. KSME Int J 18(8):1349–1357Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Chung SC (1999) CAD/CAM integration of on-the-machine measuring and inspection system for free-formed surfaces. Proc Am Soc Precis Eng 20:267–270Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Renishaw (2000) Renishaw technical specifications: probing systems for CNC machine toolsGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Davis TA et al (2006) Flexible in-process inspection through direct control. Measurement. J Int Meas Confed 39(1):57–72Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    ANSI (2004) Dimensional Measuring Interface Standard, DMIS 5.0 Standard, Part 1, ANSI/CAM-I 105.0-2004, Part 1Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    I ++DME (2005) Dimensional measurement equipment interface, the International Association of Coordinate Measuring Machine ManufacturersGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Proctor F et al (2007) Interoperability testing for shop floor measurement. Performance Metrics for Intelligent Systems (PerMIS) WorkshopGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Dimensional Markup Language (DML) (2009) http://www.aiag.org/
  38. 38.
    Horst J et al (2004) User’s manual for version 3.0 of the NIST DME interface test suite for facilitating implementations of version 1.4 of the I++DME interface specification. National Institute of Standards and TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    White RM (1987) Sensor Classification Scheme. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control UFFC 34(2):125–127Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yaoyao (Fiona) Zhao
    • 1
  • Robert Brown
    • 2
  • Thomas R. Kramer
    • 1
  • Xun Xu
    • 3
  1. 1.National Institute of Standards and TechnologyGaithersburgUSA
  2. 2.Mitutoyo America CorporationAuroraUSA
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations