Advertisement

Practices of Information Modeling

  • Yaoyao (Fiona) ZhaoEmail author
  • Robert Brown
  • Thomas R. Kramer
  • Xun Xu
Chapter
  • 739 Downloads

Abstract

In recent years, information technology has become increasingly important in the manufacturing enterprise. Effective information sharing and exchange among computer systems throughout a product’s life cycle has been a critical issue. 

Keywords

Modeling Language Unify Modeling Language Software Module Instance Document Connection Relationship 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    National Research Council (1995) Information technology for manufacturing. National research council reportGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    IMTI (2006) A roadmap for metrology interoperability. Integrated Manufacturing Technology Initiative (IMTI Inc), Oak RidgeGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lee YT (1999) An overview of information modeling for manufacturing systems integration. NISTIR 6382. National institute of standards and technologyGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen PP (2004) The entity relationship model towards a unified view of data. ACM Trans Database Syst (TODS) 1(1):1976Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tsichritzis D, Klug A (1978) The ANSI/X3/SPARC DBMS framework report of the study group on database management systems. Inform Syst 3(3):173–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Badia A (2004) Entity-relationship modeling revisited. SIGMOD Rec 33(1):77–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    UML Unified Modeling Language ( 2010). http://www.uml.org/
  8. 8.
    I D Appleton Company (1985) Integrated information support system: information modeling manual, IDEF1—Extended (IDEF1X)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    ISO (2004) ISO 10303-11: industrial automation systems and integration—product data representation and exchange—Part 11:description methods: the EXPRESS language reference manualGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schenck D, Wilson P (1994) Information modeling the EXPRESS way. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    XML Extensible Markup Language (2010) http://www.w3.org/XML/
  12. 12.
    ISO (2008) ISO 32000-1:2008: document management—portable document format—Part 1: PDF 1.7Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fowler M, Scott K (2004) UML distilled: a brief guide to the standard object modeling language, 3rd edn. Addison-Wesley, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    OMG (2009) Object management group unified modeling language (OMG UML) superstructure version 2.2Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Holt J (2004) UML for systems engineering: watching the wheels, 2nd edn. The Institution of Engineering and Technology, UKGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    IDEF Integrated DEFinition Methods (2010) http://www.idef.com/idef1X.htm(cited 19th of October 2010)
  17. 17.
    N.I.o.S.a.T. (NIST) (1993) Integration definition for information modeling (IDEF1X)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kemmerer SJ (1999) STEP: the grand experience. National Institute of Standards and Technology, GaithersburgGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    ISO (1992) ISO/IEC 9075:1992, Information technology—database languages—SQLGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    ISO (1990) ISO/IEC 9899:1990, Programming languages—CGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    C++ (2010) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Visual_Studio (cited 22 October 2010)
  22. 22.
    Kramer TR, Xu X (2009) STEP in a Nutshell. In: Xu X, Nee AYC (eds) Advanced design and manufacturing based on STEP. Springer, UK, pp 1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhao YF (2009) An integrated process planning system for machining and inspection. Department of mechanical engineering. Ph.D thesis, University of AucklandGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    ISO (1986) ISO 8879:1986: information processing—text and office systems—standard generalized markup language (SGML)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    E.V.d. Vlist (2002) XML Schema. O’Reilly Series: O’Reilly Media, IncGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    W3C. XML Schema Definition Language (2001) http://xml.coverpages.org/schemas.html#W3CWorkingGroup (cited 22 October 2010)
  27. 27.
    W3C (2004) XML Schema Part 0: Primer 2nd ednGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    ISO (2002) ISO 10303-28:Industrial automation systems and integration—product data representation and exchange—Part 28: implementation methods: XML representations of EXPRESS schema and dataGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Shaw MJ, Seidmann A, Whinston AB (1997) Information technology for automated manufacturing enterprises: recent developments and current research issues. Int J Flex Manuf Syst 9:115–120 (Compendex)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Chalmers RE (2002) Metrology for manufacturing means business. Manuf Eng. 128(4)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Proctor F et al (2007) Interoperability testing for shop floor measurement. Performance Metrics for intelligent systems (PerMIS) WorkshopGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Evans J et al (December, 2001) Analysis of dimensional metrology standards. NISTIR 6847, National institute of standards and technologyGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    ANSI (2004) Dimensional measuring interface standard, DMIS 5.0 Standard, Part 1, ANSI/CAM-I 105.0-2004, Part 1Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zhao YF et al (2009) Dimensional metrology interoperability and standardization in manufacturing systems. Comput Stand Interfaces 33:541–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    N.I.o.S.a.T. NIST (1988) Initial graphics exchange specification (IGES) Version 4.0, NBSIR pp 88–3813Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    ISO (1994) ISO 10303-1: industrial automation systems and integration—product data representation and exchange—Part 1: industrial automation system and integration—product data representation and exchange Part 1: overview and fundamental principlesGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yaoyao (Fiona) Zhao
    • 1
    Email author
  • Robert Brown
    • 2
  • Thomas R. Kramer
    • 1
  • Xun Xu
    • 3
  1. 1.National Institute of Standards and TechnologyGaithersburgUSA
  2. 2.Mitutoyo America CorporationAuroraUSA
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations