Skip to main content

Flaps

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Mohs Micrographic Surgery

Abstract

When simple primary closure is not ideal, a tissue-movement procedure, such as a flap, should be considered. The planning and execution of a flap repair following Mohs surgery vary from case to case. A skilled surgeon evaluates the risks and benefits of various options in each individual patient and anticipates potential complications. The elements to successful flap execution include proper patient selection and preparation, comprehension of risks and necessary precautions, use of sterile or clean technique, informed procedure design and meticulous suture technique, as well as good postoperative wound care and patient education. Flaps are commonly classified according to their primary movement – advancement flaps, rotation flaps, transposition flaps, and interpolation flaps – and each has its benefits and drawbacks. Meticulous postoperative wound care is necessary to ensure an optimal outcome. Patients should be seen for follow-up to evaluate outcomes and any necessary interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Berg JW, Appelbaum PS, Lidz CW, Parker LS. Informed consent: legal theory and clinical practice. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chang LK, Whitaker DC. The impact of herbal medicines on dermatologic surgery. Dermatol Surg. 2001;278:759–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Futoryan T, Grande D. Postoperative wound infection rates in dermatologic surgery. Dermatol Surg. 1995;21(6):509–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dixon AJ, Dixon MP, Askew DA, Wilkinson D. Prospective study of wound infections in dermatologic surgery in the absence of prophylactic antibiotics. Dermatol Surg. 2006;32(6):819–26; discussion 826–817.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Milton SH. Pedicled skin-flaps: the fallacy of the length: width ratio. Br J Surg. 1970;57(7):502–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Daniel RK, Williams HB. The free transfer of skin flaps by microvascular anastomoses. An experimental study and a reappraisal. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1973;52(1):16–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Stell PM. The pig as an experimental model for skin flap behaviour: a reappraisal of previous studies. Br J Plast Surg. 1977;30(1):1–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Chilukuri S, Leffell D. Basic principles of flap reconstruction. In: Cook JL, Rohrer TE, Nguyen TH, Mellette JR, editors. Flaps and grafts in dermatologic surgery. London: Elsevier; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fazio MJ, Zitelli JA. Flaps. In: Ratz JL, Geronemus RG, Goldman MP, et al., editors. Textbook of dermatologic surgery. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1998. p. 225–7.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Heniford BW, Bailin PL, Marsico Jr RE. Field guide to local flaps. Dermatol Clin. 1998;16(1):65–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dzubow LM. Flap dynamics. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1991;17(2):116–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Antia NH, Buch VI. Chondrocutaneous advancement flap for the marginal defect of the ear. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1967;39(5):472–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mellette Jr JR, Harrington AC. Applications of the crescentic advancement flap. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1991;17(5):447–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dzubow LM, Lambert RW. A dorsal nasal advancement flap for off midline defects. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2004;50(3):380–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tomich JM, Wentzell JM, Grande DJ. Subcutaneous island pedicle flaps. Arch Dermatol. 1987;123(4):514–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Dzubow LM. The dynamics of flap movement: effect of pivotal restraint on flap rotation and transposition. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1987;13(12):1348–53.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rieger RA. A local flap for repair of the nasal tip. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1967;40(2):147–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Limberg AA. Design of local flaps. Mod Trends Plast Surg. 1966;2:38–61.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bray DA. Clinical applications of the rhomboid flap. Arch Otolaryngol. 1983;109(1):37–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Masson JK, Mendelson BC. The banner flap. Am J Surg. 1977;134(3):419–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Zitelli JA. The bilobed flap for nasal reconstruction. Arch Dermatol. 1989;125(7):957–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Schulte DL, Sherris DA, Kasperbauer JL. The anatomical basis of the Abbe flap. Laryngoscope. 2001;111(3):382–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Eaglstein WH. Moist wound healing with occlusive dressings: a clinical focus. Dermatol Surg. 2001;27(2):175–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Gette MT, Marks Jr JG, Maloney ME. Frequency of postoperative allergic contact dermatitis to topical antibiotics. Arch Dermatol. 1992;128(3):365–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Smack DP, Harrington AC, Dunn C, Howard RS, Szkutnik AJ, Krivda SJ, et al. Infection and allergy incidence in ambulatory surgery patients using white petrolatum vs bacitracin ointment. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1996;276(12):972–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Cruse PJ, Foord R. The epidemiology of wound infection. A 10-year prospective study of 62,939 wounds. Surg Clin North Am. 1980;60(1):27–40.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jessica M. Sheehan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sheehan, J.M., Rohrer, T.E. (2012). Flaps. In: Nouri, K. (eds) Mohs Micrographic Surgery. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2152-7_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2152-7_33

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-2151-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-2152-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics