ICANN ’93 pp 650-653 | Cite as

Catastrophic Phase Transitions in Exact ART Networks

  • Maartje E. J. Raijmakers
  • Peter C. M. Molenaar
Conference paper

Abstract

To study the occurrence of sudden transitions in code development, bifurcation analyses of ART networks were carried out In the interest of biological plausibility, we attempted to implement each ART network completely, including all regulatory and logical functions, as a system of differential equations capable of stand-alone running in real time. In particular, transient network behaviour thus remains intact because no asymptotic approximations were used. The most important functions of Exact ART are emergent properties of the network. Preliminary results of bifurcation analyses are presented. In closing, alternative connectionistic analyses of phase transitions are criticized and it is concluded that these analyses fall short on several accounts compared to Exact ART networks.

Keywords

Manifold Mellon Subsys 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Van der Maas, H. L. J., Molenaar, P. C. M (1992). Stagewise Development: An Application of Catastrophe Theory. Psychological Review, vol. 99, no. 3, 395–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schuster, H. G., Wagner, P. (1990). A model of neural oscillations in the visual cortex. Biological Cybernetics, 64, 77–82.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Borisyuk, R. M., Kirillov, A. B. (1992). Bifurcation analysis of a neural network model. Biological Cybernetics, 66, 319–325.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Grossberg, S., Somers, D. (1991). Synchronized Oscillations During Cooperative Feature Linking in a Cortical Model of Visual Perception. Neural Networks, vol. 4, 453–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Thorn, R. (1975). Structural stability and morphogenesis. Reading, MA: Benjamin.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gilmore, R. (1981). Catastrophe theory for scientists and engineers. New York: Wiley.MATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Carpenter, G. A., Grossberg, G. (1987a). A Massively Parallel Architecture for a Self-Organizing Neural Pattern Recognition Machine. Comput. Vision Graphics Image Process., 37, 54.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Carpenter, G. A., Grossberg, G. (1987b). ART 2: selforganization of stable category recognition codes for analog input patterns. Applied Optics, vol. 26, no. 23, 4919–4930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Carpenter, G. A., Grossberg, G. (1990). ART 3: Hierarchical Search Using Chemical Transmitters in Self-Organizing Pattern Recognition Architectures. Neural Networks, vol. 3, 129–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Grossberg, S. (1980). How Does the Brain Build a Cognitive Code? Psychological Review, 87, 2–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grossberg, S. (1973). Contour Enhancement, Short Term Memory, and Constancies in reverberating neural networks. Studies in Applied Mathematics, vol LII, no. 3.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    McClelland, J. L., Jenkins, E. (1991). Nature, Nurture, and Connections: Implications of Connectionist Models for Cognitive Development. In: Architectures for Intelligence: The Twenty-second Carnegie Mellon Symposion on Cognition, (pp. 41–73). Lawrence Erlbaum Ass., Inc., Hillsdale, New York.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Raijmakers, M.E.J., Molenaar, P.C.M. (1993): A continuous alternative for ART2. Internal Report, Department of Developmental Psychology, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maartje E. J. Raijmakers
    • 1
  • Peter C. M. Molenaar
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Developmental PsychologyUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations