Advertisement

Transabdominal Tubal Endoscopy

  • O. Djahanbakhch
  • S. D. Maguiness
Conference paper

Abstract

The function of the fallopian tube is most commonly assessed by determining patency, observing a normal external appearance at endoscopy and internal appearance at hysterosalpingography. The recent development of small-diameter flexible and rigid endoscopes has facilitated the direct visualisation of the mucosal folds within the lumen. However, the information obtained by tubal endoscopy is still of only limited value in clinical practice. One reason is that most studies are based only on abnormal cases. Another is that there is limited information about variation in the appearance of the tubal lumen during the normal menstrual cycle, or in relation to age or drug therapy.

Keywords

Fallopian Tube Diagnostic Laparoscopy Infertile Patient Tubal Lumen Rigid Endoscope 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albrich W, Peters-Welte A, Gotz A, Hammer C (1984) The cytology of tubal secretion of salpingostomies by microsurgical technique. In: Harrison RF, Bonnar J, Thompson W (eds) Diagnosis and management of tubouterine factors in infertility. MTP Press Ltd, Lancaster, pp 189–191Google Scholar
  2. Blackwell RE (1989) The infertility workup and diagnosis. J Reprod Med 34:81–85PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Boer-Meisel ME, te Velde ER, Habbema JDF, Kardaun JWPF (1986) Predicting the pregnancy outcome in patients treated for hydrosalpinges: a prospective study. Fertil Steril 45:23–29PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Brosens IA, Puttemans PJ (1989) Double-optic laparoscopy. In: Sutton C (ed) Balliøre’s Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vol 3, pp 595–608Google Scholar
  5. Brosens IA, Vasquez G (1976) Fimbrial microbiopsy. J Reprod Med 16:171–178PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Brosens I, Boeckx W, Delattin Ph, Puttemans P, Vasquez G (1987) Salpingoscopy: a new preoperative diagnostic tool in tubal infertility? Br J Obstet Gynaecol 94:768–773PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cornier E (1985) L’ampulloscopie per-coelioscopique. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 14:459–466Google Scholar
  8. Cornier E (1986) Ampullosalpingoscopy. In: Siegler AM (ed) The fallopian tube: basic studies and clinical contributions. Futura Publishing Company, Mount Kisco, New York, pp 383–389Google Scholar
  9. De Bruyne F, Puttemans P, Boeckx W, Brosens IA (1989) The clinical value of salpingoscopy in tubal infertility. Fertil Steril 51:339–340PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Duignan NM, Jordan JA, Coughlan BM (1972) One thousand consecutive cases of diagnostic laparoscopy. J Obstet Gynaecol Brit Commonw 79:1016–1024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. El-Minawi MF, Abdel-Hadi M, Ibrahim AA, Wahby O (1978) Comparative evaluation of laparoscopy and hysterosalpingography in infertile patients. Obstet Gynecol 51:29–32PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Gabos P (1976) A comparison of hysterosalpingography and endoscopy in evaluation of tubal function in infertile women. Fertil Steril 27:238–242PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Gomel V (1977) Laparoscopy prior to reconstructive surgery for infertility. J Reprod Med 18:251–253PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Henry-Suchet J, Tesquier L, Loffredo V (1981) Endoscopies tubaires: premiers resultats. Gynecologie 23:293–295Google Scholar
  15. Henry-Suchet J, Tesquier L, Pez JP, Loffredo V (1983) Endoscopie tubaire ou tuboscopie: une exploration complementaire utile dans la chirurgie reparatrice des trompes. XXXIe assises franc, de gynec, Masson (ed), ParisGoogle Scholar
  16. Henry-Suchet J, Loffredo V, Tesquier L, Pez JP (1985) Endoscopy of the tube (= Tuboscopy): its prognostic value for tuboplasties. Acta Europ Fertil 16:139–145Google Scholar
  17. Hershlag A et al. (1991) Salpingoscopy: light microscopic and electron microscopic correlations. Obstet Gynecol 77:399–405PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hutchins CJ (1977) Laparoscopy and hysterosalpingogram in the assessment of tubal patency. Obstet Gynecol 49:325–327PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Israel R, March CM (1976) Diagnostic laparoscopy: a prognostic aid in the surgical management of infertility. Am J Obstet Gynec 125:969–975PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Istre O, Guttorm E (1988) The appearance of the fimbria as prognostic sign for successful fertility surgery. Nordisk Forening For Obstetrikk og Gynekologi XXVI Kongress, Abstr.Google Scholar
  21. Kerin J et al. (1990) Falloposcopy: microendoscopy of the human fallopian tube from the utero-tubal junction to the fimbria using a trans cervico-uterine approach. Fertil Steril 54:390–400PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kierse MJNC, Vandervellen R (1973) A comparison of hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy in the investigation of infertility. Obstet Gynecol 41:685–688Google Scholar
  23. Leeton J, Seiwood T (1978) The tortuous tube: pregnancy rate following laparoscopy and hydrotubation. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 18:259–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Maathuis JB, Horbach JGM, van Hall EV (1972) A comparison of the results of hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy in the diagnosis of fallopian tube dysfunction. Fertil Steril 23:428–431PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Maguiness SD, Djahanbakhch O (1991) Tuboscopy in a previously sterilised patient. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 98:326–327PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Maguiness SD, Djahanbakhch O (1992) Salpingoscopic findings in women undergoing sterilization. Hum Reprod 7:269–273PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Maguiness SD, Djahanbakhch O, Grudzinskas JG (1992) Assessment of the fallopian tube. Obstet Gynec Survey 41:587–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Marchini M et al. (1988) Ultrastructure of endosalpingeal biopsies in infertile patients: correlation with reproductive success. Int J Gynecol Obstet 27:239–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mencaglia L, Hamou J, Perino A, Cosmi E (1986) Transcervical and retrograde salpingoscopy: evaluation of the fallopian tube in infertile patients. In: Siegler AM (ed) The fallopian tube: basic studies and clinical contributions. Futura Publishing Company, Mount Kisco, New York, pp 377–381Google Scholar
  30. Moghissi KS, Sim GS (1975) Correlation between hysterosalpingography and pelvic endoscopy for the evaluation of tubal factor. Fertil Steril 26:1178–1181PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Nezhat F, Winer WK, Nezhat C (1990) Fimbrioscopy and salpingoscopy in patients with minimal to moderate pelvic endometriosis. Obstet Gynecol 75:15–17PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Paavonen J, Berg M, Lahtinen M, Heinonen PK (1984) Diagnostic laparoscopy in primary infertility. In: Harrison RF, Bonnar J, Thompson W (eds) Diagnosis and management of tubo-uterine factors in infertility. MTP Press Ltd, Lancaster, pp 167–170Google Scholar
  33. Peterson EP, Behrman SJ (1970) Laparoscopy of the infertile patient. Obstet Gynecol 36:363–367PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Philipsen T, Hansen BB (1981) Comparative study of hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy in infertile patients. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 60:149–151PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Puttemans P, Brosens I, Delattin P, Vasquez G, Boeckx W (1987) Salpingoscopy versus hysterosalpingography in hydrosalpinges. Hum Reprod 2:535–540PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Rice JP, London SN, Olive DL (1986) Reevaluation of hysterosalpingography in infertility investigation. Obstet Gynecol 67:718–721PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Servy EJ, Tzingounis VA (1978) Tubal patency: hysterosalpingography compared with laparoscopy. South Med J 71:1511–1512PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shapiro BS, Diamond MP, DeCherney AH (1988) Salpingoscopy: an adjunctive technique for evaluation of the fallopian tube. Fertil Steril 49:1076–1079PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Stadler C, Maassen G, Poehner G, Stauber M (1984) Laparoscopic findings in 801 sterile patients. In: Harrison RF, Bonnar J, Thompson W (eds) Diagnosis and management of tubouterine factors in infertility. MTP Press Ltd, Lancaster, pp 139–142Google Scholar
  40. Swolin K, Rosencrantz M (1972) Laparoscopy vs. hysterosalpingography in sterility investigations. A comparative study. Fertil Steril 23:270–273PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Taylor PJ (1977) Correlations in infertility: symptomatology, hysterosalpingography, laparoscopy, and hysteroscopy. J Reprod Med 18:339–342PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Templeton AA, Kerr MG (1977) An assessment of laparoscopy as the primary investigation in the subfertile female. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 84:760–762PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Vasquez G, Boeckx W, Winston RML, Brosens IA (1980) Human tubal mucosa and reconstructive microsurgery. In: Crosignani PG, Rubin BL (eds) Microsurgery in female infertility. Academic Press, London, pp 41–56Google Scholar
  44. Vasquez G, Winston RML, Boeckx W, Gordts S, Brosens IA (1983) The epithelium of human hydrosalpinges: a light optical and scanning electron microscopic study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 90:764–770PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Winston RML, Margara RA (1991) Microsurgical salpingostomy is not an obsolete procedure. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 98:637–642PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • O. Djahanbakhch
  • S. D. Maguiness

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations