Abstract
A fertile theory of communication must depend on a well-developed and accurate model of the agents who are communicating. In the Shannon-Weaver model (Shannon and Weaver 1964), an agent transmits a message to another agent across a possibly noisy channel. Classical information theory (Ash 1965) treats the agents as Markov processes, or a collection of states with transition probabilities between states, reflecting the likelihood of moving from one state to the next. While this view has great utility in explaining such phenomena as the relation between uncertainty and redundancy in message transmission over noisy channels, it is inadequate as a model of the mind, in general, and communicating agents, in particular. This chapter will suggest that many key properties of communication theory are best expressed as relations between decomposable states, and not as transitions between unanalysable state variables.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Allen J (1983) Recognizing intentions from natural language utterances. In: Brady M, Berwick RC (eds) Computational models of discourse. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 107–166
Ash R (1965) Information theory. Wiley, New York
Austin JL (1962) How to do things with words. Oxford University Press
Berlyne DE (1971) Aesthetics and psychobiology. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York
Berlyne DE (1974) Studies in the new experimental aesthetics. Hemisphere, Washington
Brown G, Yule G (1983) Discourse analysis. Cambridge University Press
Cohen PR, Perrault CR (1979) Elements of a plan-based theory of speech acts. Cognitive Sci 3: 177–212
Cohen PR, Perrault CR, Allen JF (1982) Beyond question answering. In: Lehnert W, Ringle M (eds) Strategies for natural language processing. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
Coulthard M (1977) An introduction to discourse analysis. Longman, London
Dorfman M, Katz B (1990, July) Simulating communicating agents with neural networks. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Communication Association, Dublin.
Grice HP (1975) Logic and conversation. In: Cole P, Morgan JL (eds) Syntax and semantics, Vol 3: Speech acts. Academic Press, New York
Grosz BJ (1981) Focusing and description in natural language dialogues. In: Joshi AK, Webber BL, Sag IA (eds) Elements of discourse understanding. Cambridge University Press, pp 84–105
Hobbs JR (1979) Coherence and coreference. Cognitive Sci 3: 67–90
Jacobs S, Jackson S (1983) Speech act structure in conversation: rational aspects of conversational coherence. In: Craig RT, Tracy K (eds) Conversational coherence: form, structure, and strategy. Sage, Beverly Hills, pp 47–66
Litman DJ, Allen JF (1987) A plan recognition model for subdialogues in conversation. Cognitive Sci 11: 163–200
Reichman R (1978) Conversational coherency. Cognitive Sci 2: 283–327
Reichman R (1985) Getting computers to talk like you and me. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Robinson WP (1985) Social psychology and discourse. In: van Dijk TA (ed) Handbook of discourse analysis, Vol 1 Academic Press, New York
Sacks H, Schegloff EA, Jefferson G (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language 50: 696–735
Schegloff EA (1972) Notes on conversational practice: formulating place. In: Sudnow D (ed) Studies in social interaction. Free Press, New York, pp 75–119
Schegloff EA, Sacks H (1973) Opening up closings. Serniotica 8: 289–327
Searle JR (1969) Speech acts. Cambridge University Press
Searle JR (1975) Indirect speech acts. In: Cole P, Morgan JL (eds) Syntax and semantics, Vol 3: Speech acts. Academic Press, New York
Searle JR (1979) Expression and meaning. Cambridge University Press.
Shannon CE, Weaver W (1964) The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1992 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Katz, B.F., Dorfman, M.H. (1992). The Neural Dynamics of Conversational Coherence. In: Clark, A., Lutz, R. (eds) Connectionism in Context. Artificial Intelligence and Society. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1923-4_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1923-4_10
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-19716-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-1923-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive