Skip to main content

The Neural Dynamics of Conversational Coherence

  • Chapter
Connectionism in Context

Part of the book series: Artificial Intelligence and Society ((HCS))

Abstract

A fertile theory of communication must depend on a well-developed and accurate model of the agents who are communicating. In the Shannon-Weaver model (Shannon and Weaver 1964), an agent transmits a message to another agent across a possibly noisy channel. Classical information theory (Ash 1965) treats the agents as Markov processes, or a collection of states with transition probabilities between states, reflecting the likelihood of moving from one state to the next. While this view has great utility in explaining such phenomena as the relation between uncertainty and redundancy in message transmission over noisy channels, it is inadequate as a model of the mind, in general, and communicating agents, in particular. This chapter will suggest that many key properties of communication theory are best expressed as relations between decomposable states, and not as transitions between unanalysable state variables.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allen J (1983) Recognizing intentions from natural language utterances. In: Brady M, Berwick RC (eds) Computational models of discourse. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 107–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Ash R (1965) Information theory. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Austin JL (1962) How to do things with words. Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlyne DE (1971) Aesthetics and psychobiology. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlyne DE (1974) Studies in the new experimental aesthetics. Hemisphere, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown G, Yule G (1983) Discourse analysis. Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen PR, Perrault CR (1979) Elements of a plan-based theory of speech acts. Cognitive Sci 3: 177–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen PR, Perrault CR, Allen JF (1982) Beyond question answering. In: Lehnert W, Ringle M (eds) Strategies for natural language processing. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulthard M (1977) An introduction to discourse analysis. Longman, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorfman M, Katz B (1990, July) Simulating communicating agents with neural networks. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Communication Association, Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice HP (1975) Logic and conversation. In: Cole P, Morgan JL (eds) Syntax and semantics, Vol 3: Speech acts. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosz BJ (1981) Focusing and description in natural language dialogues. In: Joshi AK, Webber BL, Sag IA (eds) Elements of discourse understanding. Cambridge University Press, pp 84–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs JR (1979) Coherence and coreference. Cognitive Sci 3: 67–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs S, Jackson S (1983) Speech act structure in conversation: rational aspects of conversational coherence. In: Craig RT, Tracy K (eds) Conversational coherence: form, structure, and strategy. Sage, Beverly Hills, pp 47–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Litman DJ, Allen JF (1987) A plan recognition model for subdialogues in conversation. Cognitive Sci 11: 163–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichman R (1978) Conversational coherency. Cognitive Sci 2: 283–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichman R (1985) Getting computers to talk like you and me. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson WP (1985) Social psychology and discourse. In: van Dijk TA (ed) Handbook of discourse analysis, Vol 1 Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks H, Schegloff EA, Jefferson G (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language 50: 696–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff EA (1972) Notes on conversational practice: formulating place. In: Sudnow D (ed) Studies in social interaction. Free Press, New York, pp 75–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff EA, Sacks H (1973) Opening up closings. Serniotica 8: 289–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searle JR (1969) Speech acts. Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle JR (1975) Indirect speech acts. In: Cole P, Morgan JL (eds) Syntax and semantics, Vol 3: Speech acts. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle JR (1979) Expression and meaning. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon CE, Weaver W (1964) The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Katz, B.F., Dorfman, M.H. (1992). The Neural Dynamics of Conversational Coherence. In: Clark, A., Lutz, R. (eds) Connectionism in Context. Artificial Intelligence and Society. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1923-4_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1923-4_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-19716-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-1923-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics