Epidemiology of Induced Abortion

  • S. L. Barron

Abstract

Some unkind things have been said and written about the ability of statistics to mislead. There is always more than one way to present the facts and the choice of information and its presentation inevitably reflects the bias of the author. My purpose is to provide some information about induced abortion as a prelude to the discussions about the ethics of termination of pregnancy. Debates about abortion tend to become emotional, and I hope it will be helpful to start with an examination of the large amount of information now available, much of it from governmental sources.

Keywords

Urea Europe Prostaglandin Infertility Romania 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Atrash HK, MacKay HT, Binkin NJ, Hogue CJ (1987) Legal abortion mortality in the United States: 1972 to 1982. Am J Obstet Gynecol 156: 605–612PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Barron SL (1981) Abortion and health. In: Hodgson JE (ed) Abortion and sterilization. Academic Press, London, pp 121–137Google Scholar
  3. Barron SL (1984) Service aspects of abortion. In: Alberman E, Dennis KJ (eds) Late Abortions in England and Wales. RCOG, London, pp 83–102Google Scholar
  4. Barron SL (1986) Sexual activity in girls under sixteen years of age. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 93: 787–793PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Cates W, Grimes DA (1981) Morbidity and mortality of abortion in the United States. In: Hodgson JE (ed) Abortion and sterilization. Academic Press, London, pp 154–180Google Scholar
  6. Czeizel A, Bognar Z, Tusnady G, Revez P (1970) Changes in mean birth-weight and proportion of low-weight births in Hungary, Br J Prev Soc Med 24: 146–153PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Department of Health and Social Security (1957-1989) Reports on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in England and Wales. Eleven triennial reports from 1952–1954 to 1982–1984, inclusive. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Departments of Health (1991) Report on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom, 1985–87.Google Scholar
  9. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London Fink AI (1973) Midtrimester abortion. Lancet i: 263–264Google Scholar
  10. Frank PI, Kay CR, Lewis TLT, Parish S (1985) Outcome of pregnancy following induced abortion. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 92: 308–316PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Grimes DJ, Schultz KF (1985) The comparative safety of second-trimester abortion methods. In: Abortion: medical progress and social implications. Pitman, London, pp 83–101 (Ciba foundation symposium 115)Google Scholar
  12. Henshaw SK, Morrow E (1990) Induced abortion: a world review, 1990 Supplement. Alan Guttmacher Institute, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Joint Study of Royal College of General Practitioners and the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (1985) Induced abortion operations and their early sequelae. J R Coll Gen Pract 35: 175–180Google Scholar
  14. Kapor-Stanulovic N, Beric B (1975) Family planning in Yugoslavia with special reference to the Province of Vojvodina. J Biosoc Sci 5: 179–185Google Scholar
  15. Kay CR, Frank PI (1981) Characteristics of women recruited to a long-term study of the sequelae of induced abortion. J R Coll Gen Pract 31: 473–477PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Koonin LK, Atrash HK, Smith JC, Ramick M (1990) Abortion surveillance, 1986-1987. In: CDC Surveillance Summaries, June 1990. MMWR 1990 (No SS-2) 23–60Google Scholar
  17. Koop CE (1989) Surgeon General’s Report on Abortion. Congressional record, 21 March 1989. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  18. Leete R (1976) Some comments on the demographic and social effects of the 1967 Abortion Act. J Biosoc Sci 8: 229–251Google Scholar
  19. OPCS (1987) Birth statistics, series FMl no. 13. HMSO, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. OPCS (1991) Abortion Statistics 1989. Series AB no. 16. HMSO, LondonGoogle Scholar
  21. OPCS Monitor (1987) Trends in conceptions to women resident in England and Wales: 1975–85. Series FMl 87/2. OPCS, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. Scottish Health Service (1990) Scottish Health Statistics 1990 and earlier volumes. Common Services Agency, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  23. Stanwell-Smith R (1984) Procedures used for legal abortion. In: Alberman E, Dennis KJ (eds) Late Abortions in England and Wales: report of confidential enquiry by Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. RCOG, London, pp 45–66Google Scholar
  24. Tietze C, Lewit S (1972) Joint Program for the Study of Abortion ( JPSA ). Stud Fam Plann 4: 97–122Google Scholar
  25. Tietze C (1983) Induced Abortion. In: Barron SL, Thomson AM (eds) Obstetrical epidemiology. Academic Press, London, pp 319–346Google Scholar
  26. Tietze C, Henshaw SK (1986) Induced abortion: a world review, 6th edn. Alan Guttmacher Institute, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. WHO Task Force (1979) Gestation, birth-weight and spontaneous abortion in pregnancy after induced abortion. Lancet i: 142–145Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. L. Barron

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations