Skip to main content

Means of Improving the Comparability of Intake Studies

  • Chapter
Monitoring Dietary Intakes

Part of the book series: ILSI Monographs ((ILSI MONOGRAPHS))

  • 89 Accesses

Abstract

Several methods are available for estimating intake of contaminants of food and each of the methods has certain merits and limitations. At present, standardized or commonly accepted methods are developing. One of the most important steps in this process has been the preparation of “guidelines for the study of dietary intakes of chemical contaminants” by WHO in 1985 [1]. In fact, intake estimation is conducted by different methods and modifications in different countries. This is reasonable to some extent, since the risk management policies and legislation also vary from country to country. However, estimates from different countries are actually not comparable due to inconsistent methodology. The necessity for making the studies more comparable even in one country is demonstrated in the Tables 22.1 and 22.2. It is obvious, that methodological differences are responsible for the majority of the differences shown in these tables. At present, it may also be the case that methodological advances made in certain studies are not recognized and discussed by other groups working in food toxicology or risk assessment, because of the lack of a common conceptual and methodological basis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. WHO (1985) Guidelines for the study of dietary intakes of chemical contaminants, GEMS: Global Environment Monitoring System. WHO Offset Publication No. 87, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ohmomo Y, Sumiya M (1982) Estimation on heavy metal intake from agricultural products. In: Kitagishi K, Heavy metal pollution in soils of Japan, pp 236–244

    Google Scholar 

  3. Horiguchi S, Teramoto K, Kurono T, Ninomiya K (1978) The arsenic, copper, lead, manganese and zinc contents of daily foods and beverages in Japan and the estimate of their daily intake. Osaka City Med J 24: 131–141

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Teraoka H, Morii F, Kobayashi J (1981) The concentration of 24 elements in foodstuffs and the estimation of their daily intake. Eiyo to Shokuryo 34: 221–239

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kuwabara K, Murakami Y, Maeda K et al. (1982) Daily intake of environmental contaminants by the total diet study method in Osaka (IV). Shokuhin Eisei Hen 13: 29–32

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Murakami Y, Kuwabara K, Matsumoto M et al. (1983) Daily intake of environmental contaminants by the total diet study method in Osaka (V). Shokuhin Eisei Hen 14: 59–64

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kjellström T (1979) Exposure and accumulation of cadmium in populations from Japan, the United States, and Sweden. Environ Health Perspect 28: 169–197

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kurono T (1983) Lead content in food in Japan in the early 1980’s with the estimation of its daily intake. Osaka City Med J 29: 15–41

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Weigert P, Muller J, Klein H, Zufelde K, Hillebrandt J (1984) Arsen, Blei, Cadmium und Quecksilber in und auf Lebensmitteln. ZEBS-hefte 1

    Google Scholar 

  10. Boppel B (1975) Bleigehalte vonLebensmittel. 3Blei-Aufnahme durch dietägliche Nahrung. Z Lebensm Unters Forsch 158: 287 - 290

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kampe W (1983) Lead and cadmium in vegetable. Wissenschaft und Umweltl

    Google Scholar 

  12. Louekari K, Salminen S (1983) Intake of heavy metals in Finland, West Germany, and Japan, Food Additives and Contaminants 3: 355–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Horiguchi S, Teramoto K, Kurono T, Ninomiya K (1978) An attempt at comparative estimate of daily intake of several metals (As, Cu, Pb, Mn, Zn) from foods in thirty countries in the world. Osaka City Med J 24: 237–242

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Travis CC, Etnier EL (1982) Dietary intake of cadmium in the United States: 1920–1975. Environ Res 27: 1–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kjellstrom T, Lind B, Linnman L, Elinder C (1975) Variation of cadmium concentration in Swedish wheat and barley. Arch Environ Health 30: 321–328

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Dabeka RW, McKentzie AD (1988) Lead and cadmium levels in commercial infant foods and dietary intake by infants 0–1 year old. Food Additives and Contaminants 5: 333–342

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Koivistoinen P (ed) (1980) Mineral element composition of Finnish foods. Acta Agric Scand Suppl 22

    Google Scholar 

  18. Slorach S, Gustafsson I-B, Jorhem L, Mattson P (1983) Intake of lead, cadmium and certain other metals via a typical Swedish weekly diet. Var foda Suppl 1

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kumpulainen J, Mutanen M, Paakki M, Lehto J (1987) Validity of calculation method in estimating mineral element content of a pooled total daily diet as tested by chemical analysis. Var Foda Suppl 1: 75–82

    Google Scholar 

  20. Buchet JP, Lauwerys R (1983) Oral daily intake of cadmium, lead, manganese, copper, chromium, mercury, calcium, zinc and arsenic in Belgium: a duplicate meal study. Food Chem Toxic 21: 19–24

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bander L, Morgan K, Zabik M (1983) Dietary lead intake of preschool children. Am J Public Health 73: 789–794

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Louekari K, Jolkkonen L, Varo P (1988) Exposure to cadmium from foods, estimated by analysis and calculation - comparison of methods. Food Additives Contaminants 5: 111–117

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. de Vos RH, van Dokkum, Olthof PDA, Quirijns JK, Muys T, van der Poll JM (1984) Pesticides and other chemical residues in Dutch total diet samples (June 1976–July 1978). Food Chem Toxic 22: 11–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. State Supervisory Public Health Service (1983) Surveillance program “Man and Nutrition.” Rapporten 10 Hague

    Google Scholar 

  25. Louekari K, Uusitalo U, Pietinen P (1989) Variation and modifying factors of the exposure to lead and cadmium based on an epidemiological study. The Science of the Total Environment 84: 1–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. FAO (1983) A comparative study of food consumption data from food balance sheets and household surveys. FAO Economic and Social Development Paper, Statistics Division, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sherlock JC, Barltrop D, Evans WH, Quinn MJ, Smart GA, Strehlow C (1985) Blood lead concentrations and lead intake in children of different ethnic origin. Human Toxicol 4: 513–519

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Mykkanen H, Rasanen L, Ahola M, Kimppa S (1986) Dietary intakes of mercury, lead, cadmium and arsenic by Finnish children. Human Nutr Appl Nutr 40A: 32–39

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Coomes TJ, Sherlock JC, Walters B (1982) Studies in dietary intake and extreme consumption. R Soc Health J 102: 119–123

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Louekari, K. (1991). Means of Improving the Comparability of Intake Studies. In: Macdonald, I. (eds) Monitoring Dietary Intakes. ILSI Monographs. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1828-2_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1828-2_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-1830-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-1828-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics