Skip to main content

Do Actual Intakes Ever Equal Potential Intakes?

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: ILSI Monographs ((ILSI MONOGRAPHS))

Abstract

A variety of methods is available for estimating the intake of chemicals from the diet. A division may be made between those methods which measure, by chemical analysis, the actual intake either of individuals or the “average” consumer, for example duplicate diet and total diet studies, and those which estimate potential intakes either by constructing hypothetical scenarios, for example per capita estimates or by combining food consumption data with concentration data supplied by food manufacturers. This latter method may give actual intakes if there is no degradation of the chemical during storage or subsequent preparation in the home. Even within the same basic study method there are a number of variables which may influence the final intake figure [1]: the analytical method used and assumptions made about concentrations which are below the limit of determination of the analytical methodology, the degree of preparation of the food, whether concentration data are available for all brands of a processed food etc. Although it is, therefore, only possible to estimate actual intakes, with care it is possible to achieve a reasonable approximation to the real situation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Norman JA (1987) How comparable are published data on lead and cadmium intakes. Environmental Health 20 Trace elements in human health and disease: extended abstracts from the second Nordic symposium, 17–21 August, Odense, Denmark, pp 196–199

    Google Scholar 

  2. Stockley L (1985) Changes in habitual food intake during weighed inventory surveys and duplicate diet collections. A short review. Ecol Food Nutr 17: 263–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1979) Food Additives and Contaminants Committee interim report on the review of the colouring matter in food regulations 1973, FAC/REP/29, HMSO

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sherlock JC, Walters CB (1983) Dietary intake of heavy metals and its estimation. Chem Ind July: 505–508

    Google Scholar 

  5. Coomes TJ, Sherlock JC, Walters CB (1982) Studies in dietary intake and extreme food consumption. R Soc Health J 102: 119–123

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hansen SC (1979) Conditions of use of food additives based on a budget for an acceptable daily intake. J Food Protection 42: 429–434

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fisher, C.E., Norman, J.A. (1991). Do Actual Intakes Ever Equal Potential Intakes?. In: Macdonald, I. (eds) Monitoring Dietary Intakes. ILSI Monographs. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1828-2_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1828-2_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-1830-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-1828-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics