Belgian experience with repeat immunisation in recurrent spontaneous abortions

  • S. A. Alexander
  • D. Latinne
  • M. Debruyere
  • E. Dupont
  • W. Gottlieb
  • K. Thomas

Recurrent spontaneous abortion, distressing to the mother and enigmatic to the obstetrician, has known successive phases of interest and neglect. These have ranged from denying the benefit of any therapeutic measure,(1) to various un validated therapeutic approaches, mainly hormones. In addition, there is no generally agreed definition of recurrent abortion,(2) so that simple comparisons of outcome from various groups is almost meaningless.


Spontaneous Abortion Recurrent Pregnancy Loss Recurrent Spontaneous Abortion Brucella Abortus Mycoplasma Hominis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Hawkins DF. Sex hormones in pregnancy. In: Obstetric therapeutics. Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics in obstetric practice. Ed. OF Hawkins. London: Baillere Tindall, 1974; pp. 106–150.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stirrat GM. Recurrent abortion—a review. Brit J Obstet Gynaecol 1983; 90: 881–883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mowbray JF, Gibbings CR, Sidgwick AS, Ruszkiewicz M, Beard RW. Effects of transfusion in women with recurrent spontaneous abortion. Transplant Pro 1983; XV: 896–899.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Beer AE, Shekar SS, Quebbeman JF, Xhu X. Paternal and non paternal leukocyte immunization in women with recurrent spontaneous abortions: Immune responses and subsequent pregnancy outcome. In: lmmunologie de la réproduction: relation maternofoetale. Ed. G Chaouat. Colloques INSERM, 1987; 154: 161–178.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Taylor C, Faulk WP. Prevention of recurrent abortion with leucocyte transfusions. Lancet 1981; 2: 68–69.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Unander AM, Lindholm A. Transfusions of leucocyte-rich erythrocyte concentrates: A successful treatment in selected cases of habitual abortion. Amer J Obstet Gynecol 1986; 154: 516–520.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Johnson PM, Kirkpatrick DC. HLA sharing in pregnancy. Lancet 1984; 2: 1122–1123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Naylor AF, Warburton D. Sequential analysis of spontaneous abortion. II. Collaborative study data show that gravidity determines a very substantial rise in risk. Fertil Steril 1979; 31: 282–286.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sutherland A, Cooper DW, Howie PW, Liston WA, MacGillivray I. The incidence of severe pre-eclampsia amongst mothers and mothers-in-law of pre-eclamptics and controls. Brit J Obstet Gynaecol 1981; 88: 785–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Naderi S. Congenital abnormalities in newborns of consanguinous and nonconsanguinous parents. Obstet Gynecol 1979; 53: 195–199.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stray-Pedersen B, Stray-Pedersen S. Etiologic factors and subsequent reproductive performance in 195 couples with a prior history of habitual abortion. Amer J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 148: 140–146.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Harger JH, Archer DF, Marchese SG, Muracca-Clemens M, Garver KL. Etiology of recurrent pregnancy losses and outcome of subsequent pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 1983; 62: 574–581.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Poland BJ. Recurrent spontaneous abortion. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1984; 16: 369–375.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tho TP, Byrd JR, McDonough PG. Etiology and subsequent reproductive performance of 100 couples with recurrent abortion. Fertil Steri1 1979; 32: 389–395.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Underwood JL, Mowbray JF. Treatment of recurrent spontaneous abortion. Clin lmmunol Aller 1985; 5: 33–42.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Crane JP, Wahl N. The role of maternal diabetes in repetitive spontaneous abortion. Fertil Steril 1981; 36: 477–479.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Reznikoff-Etievant MF, Durieux I, Huchet J, Salmon C, Netter A. Recurrent spontaneous abortions, HLA antigen sharing and anti-paternal immunity. Immunotherapic assay. In: lmmunologie de la réproduction: relation materno-foetale. Ed. G Chaouat. Colloques INSERM, 1987; 154: pp.187-201.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Oksenberg JR, Persitz E, Amar A, Schenker J, Segal S, Nelken D, Brautbar C. Mixed lymphocyte reactivity nonresponsiveness in couples with multiple spontaneous abortions. Fertil Steril 1983; 39: 525–529.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Smith DW, Sterling KC, Sedgwick Harvey MA. Hyperthermia as a possible teratogenic agent. J Paediatr 1978; 92: 878–883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Reznikoff-Etievant MF, Simmoney N, Janau A, Darbois Y, Netter A. Treatment of recurrent spontaneous abortions by immunisation with paternal leucocytes. Lancet 1985; 1: 1398.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mowbray JF, Underwood JL. Immunisation with paternal cells for recurrent spontaneous abortion. In: Immunologie de la réproduction: relation materno-Ioetale. Ed. G Chaouat. Colloques INSERM, 1987; 154: pp.179-186.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mowbray JF, Liddell H, Underwood JL, Gibbings C, Reginald PW, Beard RW. Controlled trial of treatment of recurrent spontaneous abortion by immunisation with paternal cells. Lancet 1985; 1: 941–943.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. A. Alexander
  • D. Latinne
  • M. Debruyere
  • E. Dupont
  • W. Gottlieb
  • K. Thomas

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations