Skip to main content

Escalation of the Campaign and Nestlé’s Response

  • Chapter
Infant Feeding
  • 78 Accesses

Abstract

The events described in the preceding chapters took place before I began my own study of the controversy which, up to then, I had followed only in the press. In the seven years which had passed since the affair first caught the attention of the public, every conceivable aspect of the problem of infant feeding in the Third World had been exhaustively debated. Medical, scientific, socio-cultural, economic, ethical, legislative, administrative and political issues had been raised, with profound differences of opinion emerging on practically every point.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. INFACT (1979) Fundraising letter: The Nestlé boycott. The Newman Center, Infant Formula Action coalition (INFACT), 1701 University Avenue SE, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55414, February 1979

    Google Scholar 

  2. Grant J (Executive Director, UNICEF) (1981) Speech at NGO Forum, United Nations, New York City, 12 January 1981

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baby Milk Action Coalition (BMAC) (1983) BMAC petition, reported in International Baby Food Action Network (IBFAN) News, April 1983

    Google Scholar 

  4. Leader’s Guide for using Bottle Babies (1977) Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility (ICCR), 475 Riverside Drive, New York, NY 10027, June 1977

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nimrod O Bwibo (Professor and Chairman Department of Paediatrics, University of Nairobi) (1978) Letter to Miss June Noronah, 14 April 1978. In: Marketing and promotion of infant formula in the developing nations, 1978. Hearing before the subcommittee on health and scientific research of the committee on human resources. US Government Printing Office, Washington DC (United States Senate 23 May 1978) pp 621-622

    Google Scholar 

  6. Audienz des Gerichtspräsidenten VIII von Bern (1976) Fortsetzung des Hauptverhandlung wegen Ehrverletsung (Hearing in Bern libel suit, 1974–76, 26 February 1976, witness Prof. Derrick B Jelliffe)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Spock B (1979) Letter which accompanied INFACT Fundraising letter (reference 1 above)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Catholic Church Investments for Corporate Social Responsibility V (1978) Special Issue, Justice & Peace Center, 3900 N. Third Street, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53212

    Google Scholar 

  9. Internal Nestlé memo (1980) Addressed to Mr. A Furer (Managing Director), US Boycott. Conclusions based on US visit (2/4 August 1980), 13 August 1980. (Reproduced by INFACT under the title: Nestlégate secret memo reveals corporate cover-up, 1980)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Miller M (1974) The baby killer. War on Want, London

    Google Scholar 

  11. Post JE, Baer E (1979) Demarketing infant formula: consumer products in the developing world. Contemp Business 7: No. 4

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nestlé H (1869) Memorial on the nutrition of infants. Loertscher & Son, Vevey (Switzerland)

    Google Scholar 

  13. WHO (1969) Report on the meeting of the protein advisory group’s ad hoc working group on feeding the pre-school child. Geneva, WHO, December 1969

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nestlé Infant Food Policy (1978) Issued by the infant and dietetic products department, Nestlé Products Technical Assistance Co. Ltd, Switzerland, February 1978

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ministry of Health, Singapore (1982) The code of ethics on the sale of infant formula products in Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  16. Caribbean Food and Nutrition Institute (1974) A report on some aspects of the sales promotion of proprietary brands of milk for feeding infants. Caribbean Food and Nutrition Institute, Kingston, Jamaica

    Google Scholar 

  17. INFACT (1978) Fund-raising letter; The Nestlé Boycott. Infant Formula Action Coalition (INFACT), San Francisco 1978

    Google Scholar 

  18. May CD (1981) The “infant formula controversy”: a notorious threat to reason in matters of health. Pediatrics 68: 428–430

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Leah Margulies (Program Director Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility (ICCR)) (1979) Interview in International Herald Tribune, 13 October 1979

    Google Scholar 

  20. Committee on Church and Society (1980) Report No. 71 (Minority). Subject: Infant Formula, 20 April 1980. In: Daily Christian Advocate, 24 April 1980

    Google Scholar 

  21. Minus Paul M (1979) The infant formula issue: other perspectives. The Christian Century 96:662, 663

    Google Scholar 

  22. Minus Paul M (1980) A background paper on the infant formula controversy, prepared for the United Methodist task-force on infant formula, 17 September 1980

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Veraldi, G. (1988). Escalation of the Campaign and Nestlé’s Response. In: Dobbing, J. (eds) Infant Feeding. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1618-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1618-9_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-1620-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-1618-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics