Advertisement

Escalation of the Campaign and Nestlé’s Response

  • G. Veraldi

Abstract

The events described in the preceding chapters took place before I began my own study of the controversy which, up to then, I had followed only in the press. In the seven years which had passed since the affair first caught the attention of the public, every conceivable aspect of the problem of infant feeding in the Third World had been exhaustively debated. Medical, scientific, socio-cultural, economic, ethical, legislative, administrative and political issues had been raised, with profound differences of opinion emerging on practically every point.

Keywords

Infant Formula Infant Feeding Bottle Baby Breast Milk Substitute Nutrition Institute 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    INFACT (1979) Fundraising letter: The Nestlé boycott. The Newman Center, Infant Formula Action coalition (INFACT), 1701 University Avenue SE, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55414, February 1979Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Grant J (Executive Director, UNICEF) (1981) Speech at NGO Forum, United Nations, New York City, 12 January 1981Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baby Milk Action Coalition (BMAC) (1983) BMAC petition, reported in International Baby Food Action Network (IBFAN) News, April 1983Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Leader’s Guide for using Bottle Babies (1977) Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility (ICCR), 475 Riverside Drive, New York, NY 10027, June 1977Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nimrod O Bwibo (Professor and Chairman Department of Paediatrics, University of Nairobi) (1978) Letter to Miss June Noronah, 14 April 1978. In: Marketing and promotion of infant formula in the developing nations, 1978. Hearing before the subcommittee on health and scientific research of the committee on human resources. US Government Printing Office, Washington DC (United States Senate 23 May 1978) pp 621-622Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Audienz des Gerichtspräsidenten VIII von Bern (1976) Fortsetzung des Hauptverhandlung wegen Ehrverletsung (Hearing in Bern libel suit, 1974–76, 26 February 1976, witness Prof. Derrick B Jelliffe)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Spock B (1979) Letter which accompanied INFACT Fundraising letter (reference 1 above)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Catholic Church Investments for Corporate Social Responsibility V (1978) Special Issue, Justice & Peace Center, 3900 N. Third Street, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53212Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Internal Nestlé memo (1980) Addressed to Mr. A Furer (Managing Director), US Boycott. Conclusions based on US visit (2/4 August 1980), 13 August 1980. (Reproduced by INFACT under the title: Nestlégate secret memo reveals corporate cover-up, 1980)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Miller M (1974) The baby killer. War on Want, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Post JE, Baer E (1979) Demarketing infant formula: consumer products in the developing world. Contemp Business 7: No. 4Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nestlé H (1869) Memorial on the nutrition of infants. Loertscher & Son, Vevey (Switzerland)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    WHO (1969) Report on the meeting of the protein advisory group’s ad hoc working group on feeding the pre-school child. Geneva, WHO, December 1969Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nestlé Infant Food Policy (1978) Issued by the infant and dietetic products department, Nestlé Products Technical Assistance Co. Ltd, Switzerland, February 1978Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ministry of Health, Singapore (1982) The code of ethics on the sale of infant formula products in SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Caribbean Food and Nutrition Institute (1974) A report on some aspects of the sales promotion of proprietary brands of milk for feeding infants. Caribbean Food and Nutrition Institute, Kingston, JamaicaGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    INFACT (1978) Fund-raising letter; The Nestlé Boycott. Infant Formula Action Coalition (INFACT), San Francisco 1978Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    May CD (1981) The “infant formula controversy”: a notorious threat to reason in matters of health. Pediatrics 68: 428–430PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Leah Margulies (Program Director Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility (ICCR)) (1979) Interview in International Herald Tribune, 13 October 1979Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Committee on Church and Society (1980) Report No. 71 (Minority). Subject: Infant Formula, 20 April 1980. In: Daily Christian Advocate, 24 April 1980Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Minus Paul M (1979) The infant formula issue: other perspectives. The Christian Century 96:662, 663Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Minus Paul M (1980) A background paper on the infant formula controversy, prepared for the United Methodist task-force on infant formula, 17 September 1980Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Veraldi

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations