Skip to main content

Origins of the Controversy

  • Chapter

Abstract

It has been agreed in the previous chapter that the superiority of breast-feeding and human milk over possible substitutes has never been in dispute. In addition to high nutritive value, breast-feeding involves none of the hazards inherent in preparing substitutes especially in settings where babies are particularly vulnerable to disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Duncum BM (1947) Some notes on the history of lactation. Br Med Bull V: 1141

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fildes V (1986) Breasts, bottles and babies — a history of infant feeding. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  3. Apple RD (1980) “To be used only under the direction of a physician”: Commercial infant feeding and medical practice, 1870–1940. Bull Hist Med 54: 402–417

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Pelto GH (1981) Perspectives on infant feeding: decision-making and ecology. Food Nutr Bull 3: 16–29

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cox DO (1978) Summary statement of Abbott Laboratories on the role of prepared infant formulas in the third world. In: Marketing and promotion of infant formula in the developing nations, 1978. Hearing before the subcommittee on health and scientific research of the committee on human resources. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC. (United States Senate May 23, 1978) pp 198–203

    Google Scholar 

  6. Internal Report (1970) PAHO/WHO-UNICEF Conference of pediatricians and representatives of the food industry on infant feeding in Latin America and the Caribbean, Bogota, Columbia, Nov 5–6

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jelliffe DB (1971) Commerciogenic malnutrition? Time for a dialogue. Food Technol 15(Feb): 55–56

    Google Scholar 

  8. Protein advisory group of the United Nations System (PAG) (1973) Introduction. Promotion of special foods (infant formula and processed protein foods) for vulnerable groups. (PAG statement No. 23, 18 July 1972, revised 28 November 1973)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jelliffe DB, Jelliffe EFP (1974) Food supplies for physiologically vulnerable groups. In: Elliott K, Knight J (Eds) Human rights in health. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1974:133-151 (Ciba Foundation Symposium 23).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Geach H (1973) The baby food tragedy. New Internationalist Aug: 8-12, 23

    Google Scholar 

  11. Peter Adamson (1973) Editor, New Internationalist, letter to Nestlé. Aug 16

    Google Scholar 

  12. Anonymous (1973) Milk and murder. New Internationalist Oct: 1

    Google Scholar 

  13. Muller M (1974) The baby killer. War on Want, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McComas, M. (1988). Origins of the Controversy. In: Dobbing, J. (eds) Infant Feeding. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1618-9_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1618-9_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-1620-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-1618-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics