Skip to main content

Resolution of the Conflict

  • Chapter

Abstract

Throughout 1983, attempts by the Infant Formula Action Coalition (INFACT) to revitalise the boycott against Nestlé failed. A much publicised international petition drive aimed at collecting one million signatures for delivery at the Nestlé Annual General Assembly “to demonstrate international concern over this issue” and symbolise the one million babies estimated to die each year “from infant formula abuse” [1], succeeded in achieving only 10% of its aim.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. IBFAN News (1983) April IBFAN, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  2. Church of the Brethren (1983) Letter to NCCN, 21 October 1983

    Google Scholar 

  3. International Code of Marketing of Breast Milk Substitutes, Art. 4.2 and 9.2

    Google Scholar 

  4. International Code of Marketing of Breast Milk Substitutes, Art. 4.2

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nestlé Infant Formula Audit Commission (1983) Quarterly Report No. 5, for the period ending 30 September 1983

    Google Scholar 

  6. WHO/UNICEF (1982) Notes on the international code of marketing of breast milk substitutes. WHO/UNICEF/IC/July 1982

    Google Scholar 

  7. Department of Health and Social Security (1983) Health Circular (HC(83)13) Health services development, international code of marketing of breast milk substitutes. July 1983

    Google Scholar 

  8. Johnson Douglas A (National Chairperson Infant Formula Action Coalition (INFACT)) (1984) Statement. INFACT, Washington DC, 26 January 1984

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wittet S, Zimmerman M (1987) Implementing the World Health Organization Code: improved information for mothers. J Nutr Ed 19: 73-76

    Google Scholar 

  10. WHO Guidelines (1986) Concerning the main health and socioeconomic circumstances in which infants have to be fed on breastmilk substitutes, WHO, A39/8 Add.l, 10 April 1986

    Google Scholar 

  11. World Health Assembly Resolution 39.28 (1986) Infant and young child feeding para 2(6), 16 May 1986

    Google Scholar 

  12. International Negotiators for Babyfood Code Compliance (INBC) (1986) Letter addressed to Mr. H Maucher, Managing Director, Nestlé SA, 13 October 1986

    Google Scholar 

  13. Angst CL (1984) Letter to Lisa Woodburn (on behalf of INBC Europe), 17 September 1984

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nestlé Coordination Center for Nutrition Inc. (1984) Minutes of press conference, Washington DC, 4 October 1984

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Veraldi, G. (1988). Resolution of the Conflict. In: Dobbing, J. (eds) Infant Feeding. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1618-9_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1618-9_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-1620-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-1618-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics