Measurement of Human Normal Tissue and Tumour Responses
The scarcity of quantitative measures of normal tissue damage and tumour response in patients undergoing radiotherapy is an obstacle to the clinical evaluation of new treatment strategies. Retrospective studies of complications in critical normal tissues taught important lessons in the past concerning the potential dangers of hypofractionation (Singh 1978). However, it is unethical to use serious complications as planned end-points in prospective studies. One aim of this paper is to review the desirable characteristics of clinical end-points required to compare alternative treatments employing radiotherapy, with emphasis on simple scales applied by clinicians or even the patients themselves.
KeywordsTumour Response Human Normal Tissue Moist Desquamation Radiation Myelopathy Normal Tissue Damage
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Aaronson NK, Bakker W, Stewart AL et al. (1986) A multi-dimensional approach to the measurement of quality of life in lung cancer clinical trials: A joint project of the EORTC Lung Cancer Cooperative Group and Study Group on quality of life. In: Aaronson NK, Beckmann J, Bernheim J, Zittoun R (eds) Aaronson NK, Bakker W, Stewart AL et al, pp 63–82 ( EORTC monograph series )Google Scholar
- Bloom HJG, Wallace ENK, Henk JM (1969) The treatment and prognosis of medulloblastoma in children: a study of 82 verified cases. Am J Roentgenol 105: 43–62Google Scholar
- Dische S, Saunders MI (1980) Tumour regression and prognosis: a clinical study. Br J Cancer 41 [Suppl IV]: 11–13Google Scholar
- Glaholm J, Repetto JR, Yarnold JR, Smith IE, Magrini S, Cherryman G. (1987) Carboplatin (JM8), etoposide (VP16) and thoracic irradiation for small cell lung cancer (SCLC): an evaluation of lung toxicity (Submitted)Google Scholar
- Glucksmann A (1974) Histological features in the local radiocurability of carcinomas. In: Friedman M (ed) The biological and clinical basis of radiosensitivity. CC Thomas, Springfield, Illinois, pp 203–218Google Scholar
- Glucksmann A, Spear FG (1945) The qualitative and quantitative histological examination of biopsy material from patients treated by radiation for carcinoma of the cervix. Br J Radiol 18: 313Google Scholar
- Pezner RD, Archambeau JO (1981) Brain tolerance unit: a method to estimate risk of radiation brain injury for various dose schedules. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 3: 397–402Google Scholar
- Saunders MI, Anderson P, Dische S, Craig Martin WM (1982) A controlled clinical trial of misonidazole in the radiotherapy of patients with carcinoma of the bronchus. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 8:347–350Google Scholar
- Suit HD, Walker AM (1980) Assessment of the response of tumours to radiation: clinical and experimental studies. Br J Cancer 41 [Suppl IV]: 1–10Google Scholar
- Van der Kogel AJ (1986) Radiation-induced in the CNS: an interpretation of target cell responses. Br J Cancer 53 [Suppl VII]: 207–217Google Scholar
- Van der Schueren E, Van den Bogaert W, Kian Ang K (1983) Radiotherapy with multiple fractions per day. In: Steel GG, Adams GE, Peckham MJ (eds) The biological basis of radiotherapy. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 195–210Google Scholar
- Yarnold JR, Horwich A, Duchesne G, Westbrook K, Gibbs JE, Peckham MJ (1983) Chemotherapy and radiotherapy for advanced testicular non-seminoma. 1. The influence of sequence and timing of drugs and radiation on the appearance of normal tissue damage. Radiother Oncol 1: 91–99Google Scholar