Advertisement

ICANN 98 pp 209-214 | Cite as

Neural Network Modelling of Ore Grade Spatial Variability

  • Ioannis K. Kapageridis
  • Bryan Denby
Part of the Perspectives in Neural Computing book series (PERSPECT.NEURAL)

Abstract

Ore grade is one of the main variables that characterise an orebody. Almost every mining project begins with the determination of ore grade distribution in three-dimensional space, a problem often reduced to modelling the spatial variability of ore grade values. So far, this has been achieved following the geostatistical approach, and more precisely, it’s main process of structural analysis. Structural analysis in geostatistics is a very powerful tool, however, it is also quite difficult and time-consuming requiring a large amount of knowledge.

This paper describes a neural network approach to modelling ore grade spatial variability, inspired by the geostatistical process of structural analysis. The developed system consists of several modules responsible for different aspects of the modelling. It is tested using data from a real undeveloped deposit. The results obtained from the system show that neural networks offer a valid alternate approach to the problem of ore grade estimation, while requiring considerably less knowledge and time.

Keywords

Radial Basis Function Radial Basis Function Network Neural Network System Gold Grade Grade Estimation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Journel AG, Huijbregts ChJ. Mining geostatistics. Academic Press, London 1978Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wu X, Zhou Y. Reserve estimation using neural network techniques. Computers & Geosciences, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 567–575, Pergamon Press, 1993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cianci E, Owen D, Durucan S, Ravencroft P. Recoverable reserve estimation using a neural network. In: Elbrond J, Tang X (ed) 24th International Symposium on the Application of Computers and Operations Research in the Minerals Industries (APCOM). Montreal, Quebec, 1993Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Burnett C. Application of neural networks to mineral reserve estimation, PhD Thesis, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, 1995Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kapageridis I, Denby B. Ore grade estimation with modular neural network systems — a case study. In: Panagiotou G (ed) Information technology in the minerals industry (MineIT’ 97). AA Balkema, Rotterdam, 1998Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Powell M. Radial basis functions for multivariate interpolation: a review. In: Mason J, Cox M (ed) The approximation of functions and data. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1987Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Broomhead D, Lowe D. Multivariable functional interpolation and adaptive networks. Complex Systems 1988; 2: 321–355MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Moody J, Darken C. Fast learning in networks of locally-tuned processing units. Neural Computation 1989; 1: 281–294, MIT PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Girosi F, Poggio T. Networks and the best approximation property. Biological Cybernetics 1990; 63: 169–176, Springer-VerlagMathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Park J, Sandberg I. Approximation and radial-basis-function networks. Neural Computation 1993; 5: 305–316, MIT PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lowe D. Radial basis function networks. In: Arbib M (ed) The handbook of brain theory and neural networks. MIT Press, 1995Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ioannis K. Kapageridis
    • 1
  • Bryan Denby
    • 1
  1. 1.AIMS Research Unit, School of Chemical, Environmental and Mining EngineeringUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations