Multi-Domain Optimisation Using Computer Experiments for Concurrent Engineering

  • R. A. Bates
  • R. Fontana
  • L. Pronzato
  • H. P. Wynn
Conference paper


It is a challenge to optimise several simulators in a multi-objective way in Computer-Aided Engineering (CAE). The technology of replacing each simulator with a fast statistical emulator based on a space-filling computer experiment is introduced. A case study based on a rudimentary model of a car suspension system is conducted in full and is one of a series in a collaborative EU project (No. BE96-3046) which has a particular emphasis on multi-domain problems: mechanical, thermal, electrical etc. In the case study the objectives from three separate simulator responses are combined in different portmanteau criteria; global optimisation is then used to find Pareto solutions.


Covariance Rubber 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    R A Bates, R J Buck, E Riccomagno, and H P Wynn. Experimental design for large systems. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 58: 77–94, 1996.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    R A Bates, R J Buck, and H P Wynn. Generic circuit response interpolation for robust design. IEE Proc Circ. Dev. and Syst., 142: 131–134, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    R A Bates and H P Wynn. Tolerancing and optimisation for model-based Robust Engineering Design. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 12: 119–127, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    M D McKay, W J Conover, and R J Beckman. A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics, 21: 239–245, 1979.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    J Sacks, W J Welch, T J Mitchell, and H P Wynn. Design and analysis of computer experiments. Statistical Science, 4: 409–435, 1989.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    R E Steuer. Multiple Criteria Optimization: Theory, Computations and Applications. Wiley, New York, 1986.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    W. J. Welch, R. J. Buck, J. Sacks, H. P. Wynn, T. J. Mitchell, and M. D. Morris. Screening, predicting, and computer experiments. Technometrics, 34 (1): 15–25, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    P L Yu. Multiple Criteria Decision Making: Concepts techniques and Extensions. Plenum Press, New York, 1985.MATHGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    P L Yu. Multiple criteria decision making: five basic concepts. In G L Nemhauser et al., editor, Handbooks in OR 8 MS vol.1, pages 663–699. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1989.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. A. Bates
    • 1
  • R. Fontana
    • 2
  • L. Pronzato
    • 3
  • H. P. Wynn
    • 1
  1. 1.University of WarwickCoventryUK
  2. 2.Centro Ricerche FIATOrbassano, TorinoItaly
  3. 3.Laboratiore i3SCNRSFrance

Personalised recommendations