Skip to main content

Robots: A Premature Solution for the Land Mine Problem

  • Conference paper
Robotics Research

Abstract

Several large research efforts have failed, so far, to develop an effective mine clearance alternative to the existing manual technique. Robots have been tried at great expense, but without success. This paper argues that robots are not an appropriate solution for mine clearance. First, there is little likelihood of sensing improvements in the short term. Second, the huge variety of mines and minefields defies any automated solution. Third, robotic solutions are likely to be too expensive to be practical for humanitarian demining operations in countries like Angola, Afghanistan and Cambodia. The effort devoted to robotic solutions would be more helpful if it were directed at simple equipment improvements and low-cost robotic devices might provide some useful improvements in safety and cost-effectiveness in the short to medium term.

Understanding why “high tech” research efforts have failed, so far, may help to avoid similar mistakes in other ambitious robotics research programmes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cain, B. and T. Meidinger (1996). ‘The Improved Landmine Detection System.’ (EUREL, 1996), pp. 188–192.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Daniels, R. A. (1996), Videotape shown at EUREL conference Detecting Abandoned Landmines, Edinburgh, available from ERA plc, Britain.

    Google Scholar 

  3. EUREL (1996) Proceedings of EUREL International Conference on the Detection of Abandoned Landmines, IEE Conference Publication 431, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Janes (1996). Janes Mines and Mine Clearance Techniques, King, C (Ed) Coulsdon (163 Brighton Rd, Coulsdon, Surrey CR5 2NH, UK) Jane’s Information Group.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jefferson (1997). Mines, Damn Lies and Statistics, Manchester Guardian, September 1997 (available from http://www.mech.uwa.edu.au/jpt/demining/lies.html).

    Google Scholar 

  6. King, C. (1997) Mine Clearance in the Real World. SusDem97: International Workshop on Sustainable Humanitarian Demining, Zagreb, October, ppS2.1–S2.8.

    Google Scholar 

  7. King, C. (1996) Personal communication. (Editor of Janes ‘Mines and Mine Clearance).

    Google Scholar 

  8. McGrath, R. (1994). Landmines, Legacy of Conflict: A Manual for Development Workers, Oxfam, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  9. McMichael, D.W. (1996) ‘Data Fusion for Vehicle-Borne Mine Detection.’ (EUREL, 1996), pp. 167–171.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nicoud, J.D. (1995) Proceedings of Workshop on Anti-personnel Mine Detection and Removal WAPM ‘95, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Microprocessors and Interfaces Laboratory (EPFL-LAMI), Lausanne, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nicoud, J-D. (1996) ‘A Demining Technology Project.’ (EUREL, 1996), pp.37–41.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nicoud, J-D. (1997) Vehicles and Robots for Humanitarian Demining, Industrial Robot Vol 24, No. 2, pp 164–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Red Cross (1995) Landmines must be stopped: Chapter VI Mine Clearance. Special Brochure, International Committee of Red Cross, Geneva, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Trevelyan, J. P. (1992). Robots for Shearing Sheep: Shear Magic. Oxford Science Publications, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Trevelyan, J. P. (1996c) ‘A suspended device for humanitarian demining.’ (EUREL, 1996), pp.42–45.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Trevelyan, J. P. (1997a) Robots and Landmines, Industrial Robot Vol 24, No. 2, pp 114–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Trevelyan, J. (1997b). Modelling minefield clearance statistics. Technical Report, Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, University of Western Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Trevelyan, J. P. (1997c). Better tools for deminers: International Workshop on Sustainable Humanitarian Demining, Zagreb, October, pp S6.1–S612.

    Google Scholar 

  19. UNOCHA (1996) Notes on interviews with UN Office for Coordinating Humanitarian Aid to Afghanistan (UNOCHA), Islamabad. (Available from author).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Trevelyan, J. (1998). Robots: A Premature Solution for the Land Mine Problem. In: Shirai, Y., Hirose, S. (eds) Robotics Research. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1580-9_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1580-9_36

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-1582-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-1580-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics