Design of an Anthropomorphic Haptic Interface for the Human Arm

  • Massimo Bergamasco
  • Giuseppe Maria Prisco
Conference paper

Abstract

In this paper, methods and technical issues dealing with the design of an anthropomorphic haptic interface for the upper limb are presented. The device features seven rotational joints whose axes are aligned with the user arm degrees of freedom (d.o.f.) in order to fully preserve the freedom of movement of the human arm. Its links adhere just to the external side of the user arm, without fully wrapping it. The interface can apply forces and torques at the level of the medium part of the arm, forearm and palm of the user. Highly intuitive operation, universal applicability, large workspace and the possibility of being used together with an hand force feedback system, are the most remarkable consequences of its coherent anthropomorphic design. The system requirements and the design choices are discussed; the innovative mechanical solutions are described.

Keywords

Torque Rotary Actuator Estima Prona 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bergamasco, M. (1995a). Force replication to the human operator: the development of arm and hand exoskeletons as haptic interfaces. ISRR International Symposium of Robotics Research.Google Scholar
  2. Bergamasco, M. (1995b). Haptic interfaces: The study of force and tactile feedback systems. Proc. of IEEE Workshop on Robot and Human Communication ROMAN ‘95.Google Scholar
  3. Bergamasco, M., B. Allotta, L. Bosio, L. Ferretti, G. M. Prisco, G. Parrini, F. Salsedo, and G. Sartini (1994). An arm exoskeleton system for teleoperation and virtual environments applications. Proc. 1994 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.Google Scholar
  4. Bergamasco, M. and G. M. Prisco (1995). Virtual surfaces countur following: An experimental approach exploiting and arm exoskeleton as haptic interface. Proc. 1995 ASME Winter Annual Meeting-Session on Haptic Interfaces for VirtualEnvironment and Teleoperation.Google Scholar
  5. Burdea, G. C. (1996). Force and Touch Feedback for Virtual Reality (1 ed.). Wiley-Interscience Publication.Google Scholar
  6. Burke, J. (1994). Exoskeleton Master Arm, Wrist and End Effector Controller with Force-Reflecting Telepresence. Technical Report AL/CF-TR-1994-0146, Odetics Inc., Anaheim, CA.Google Scholar
  7. Ellis, R. E., P. Zion, and C. Y. Tso (1997). Interactive visual and force rendering of human-knee dynamics. Fifth International Symposiom on Experimental Robotics.Google Scholar
  8. Fischer, P. and R. Daniel (1990). Specification and design of input devices for teleoperation. Proc. 1990 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.Google Scholar
  9. Hayward, V. and O. Astely (1995). Performance measures for haptic devices. ISRR International Symposium of Robotics Research.Google Scholar
  10. Hayward, V. and J. M. Cruz-Hernandez (1995). Parameter sensitivity analisys for design and control of tendon transmissions. Fourth International Symposium on Experimental Robotics.Google Scholar
  11. Hirose, S. (1993). Biologically inspired robots (1 ed.). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Jacobsen, S., F. Smith, and D. Backman (1991). High performance, dextrous telerobotic manipulator with force reflection. Intervention/ROV’91.Google Scholar
  13. Prisco, G. M. and M. Bergamasco (1997). Dynamic modelling of a class of tendon driven manipulators. International Conference on Advanced Robotics.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Massimo Bergamasco
    • 1
  • Giuseppe Maria Prisco
    • 1
  1. 1.PERCRO, Simultaneous Presence, Telepresence and Virtual PresenceScuola Superiore S.AnnaPisaItaly

Personalised recommendations