Skip to main content

Design as Building and Reusing Artifact Theories: Understanding and Supporting Growth of Design Knowledge

  • Conference paper
The Design Productivity Debate

Abstract

As artifacts are designed, knowledge is accumulated gradually and — as this knowledge is organized and reused — designs and design processes are continually refined. An understanding of the nature and growth of design knowledge and its reuse is essential for implementing better design systems and effective design practices. To develop such an understanding, we introduce artifact theory as an interdisciplinary theory about an artifact that is essential for designing that artifact. This theory encapsulates various types of synthetic, analytic and process knowledge and reconciles many disciplinary theories in the context of the artifact. We argue that it is necessarily a contextual theory and hence is ephemeral. While highly mature and well understood design domains may have complete artifact theories, in most domains artifact theories evolve during design. That is, designers not only produce a manufacturable description of the artifact, but also produce the corresponding artifact theory. We observe that this involves both adaptation and reuse of elements of existing artifact theories as well as development of new elements. Hence, we propose the view of design as building and reuse of artifact theories as the basis for understanding design and for developing design environments. We describe artifact theory in terms of several disparate views of design and bring them together leading to a unifying view. We discuss the implications of the view for computational design environments and outline our current research efforts in advancing and supporting this view.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Suppe F 1977 The Structure of Scientific Theories. University of Illinois Press, Urbana IL

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mehlberg H 1962 The theoretical and emperical aspects of science. In: Nagel E, Supes P, Tarskied A (eds) Proceedings of the 1960 Congress on Logic Methodology and Philosophy of Science. Stanford University Press, Palo Alto CA, pp 275–284

    Google Scholar 

  3. Addis W 1990 Structural Engineering: The Nature of Theory and Design. Ellis Horwood Limited, West Sussex England

    Google Scholar 

  4. Reddy J M, Chan B, Finger S 1996 Patterns in design discourse: a case study. In: Knowledge Intensive CAD, Volume 1. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 265–283

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cutkosky M, Tenenbaum J, Glucksman J 1996 Madefast: an exercise in collaborative engineering over the internet. Communications of the ACM 39(9):78–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Siewiorek D P, Smailagic A, Lee J CY, Adl-Tabatabai A R 1994 Interdisciplinary concurrent design methodology as applied to the navigator wearable computer system. Journal of Computer and Software Engineering 2(3): 259–292

    Google Scholar 

  7. Finger S, Stivoric J, Amon C. et al. 1996 Reflections on a concurrent design methodology: A case study in wearable computer design. Computer-Aided Design 28(5):393–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Finger S, Gardner E, Subrahmanian E 1993 Design support systems for concurrent engineering: A case study in large power transformer design. In: Proceedings of The International Conference on Engineering Design ICED′93. The Hauge, pp 1433–1440

    Google Scholar 

  9. McMahon C 1994 Observations on modes of incremental change in design. Journal of Engineering Design 5(3): 195–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Duffy A H B, Kerr S M 1993 Customised perspectives of past designs from automated group rationalisations. Artificial Intelligence in Engineering 8:183–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Duffy A H B, Duffy S M 1996 Learning for design reuse. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design Analysis and Manufacturing 10:139–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Vincenti W 1990 What Engineers Know and How They Know It. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore MD

    Google Scholar 

  13. Petroski H 1985 To Engineer is Human: The Role of Failure in Successful Design. St Martin’s Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. Meyer S A 1995 Description of the structural design of tall buildings through the grammar paradigm. PhD thesis, Carnegie Mellon University

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yoshikawa H 1981 General design theory and a CAD system. In: Man-Machine Communication in CAD/CAM. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 35–58

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tomiyama T, Yoshikawa H 1986 Extended General Design Theory. Tech Report CS-R8604 Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tomiyama T, Yoshikawa H 1985 Extended general design theory. In Design Theory in Computer-Aided Design North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 95–130

    Google Scholar 

  18. Reich Y A 1995 Critical review of general design theory. Research in Engineering Design 7(1):1–1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fitzhorn P A 1994 Engineering design is a computable function. Artificial Intelligence in Engineering Design and Manufacturing 8(1):35–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hubka V, Eder W E 1988 Theory of Technical Systems: A Total Concept Theory for Engineering Design. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  21. Monarch I A, Konda S L, Levy S N, Reich Y, Subrahmanian E, Ulrich C 1993 Shared memory in design: theory and practice. In: Social Science Research Technical Systems and Cooperative Work. Paris, pp 227–241

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yoshikawa H 1992 Proposal for artifactual engineering: aims to make science and technology self-conclusive. In: Illume A Tepco Semiannual Review Tokyo Electric Power Co Inc., Tokyo, pp 41–56

    Google Scholar 

  23. Suh N P 1988 The Principles of Design. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  24. Naur P 1985 Programming as theory building. Microprocessing and Microprogramming 15:253–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bucciarelli L L 1988 An ethnographic perspective on engineering design. Design Studies 9(3):159–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rittel H, Webber M 1973 Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences 4:155–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hubka V (ed) 1991 Proceedings of ICED′91 International Conference on Engineering Design. WDK, Zurich

    Google Scholar 

  28. Reddy J 1996 Building and reuse of artifact theories: A view of design and its implications for computational environments. PhD thesis, Carnegie Mellon University

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hong J, Toye G, Leifer L 1995 PENS: personal electronic notebook with sharing. In: Fourth IEEE Workshop on Enabling Technologies. Berkeley Springs West Virginia

    Google Scholar 

  30. Finger S, Konda S, Subrahmanian E 1995 Concurrent design happens at the interfaces. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design Analysis and Manufacturing 9:89–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Cutkosky M R, Engelmore R S, Fikes R E et al. 1993 PACT, an experiment in integrating concurrent engineering systems. Computer 26(1):28–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Olsen G, Cutkosky M, Tenenbaum J M, Gruber T 1994 Collaborative engineering based on knowledge sharing agreements. Proceedings of the ASME Database Symposium. Minneapolis MN pp 11–14

    Google Scholar 

  33. Levy S, Subrahmanian E, Konda S, Coyne R, Westerberg A, Reich Y 1993 An Overview of n-dim Environment. EDRC Technical Report 05-65-93 Carnegie Mellon University

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Reddy, J.M., Finger, S., Konda, S., Subrahmanian, E. (1998). Design as Building and Reusing Artifact Theories: Understanding and Supporting Growth of Design Knowledge. In: Duffy, A.H.B. (eds) The Design Productivity Debate. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1538-0_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1538-0_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-1540-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-1538-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics