Skip to main content

Understanding the Concurrent Engineering Implementation Process — A Study Using Focus Groups

  • Conference paper

Abstract

Focus groups have been used as one method of collecting data on how practitioners view Concurrent Engineering and its implementation. Focus groups are a controversial research method, but their use provides a rich source of primary data, which can be supplemented by other data collection methods. The output from the focus groups shows the issues which Concurrent Engineering practitioners consider to be important for Concurrent Engineering implementation: senior management commitment, implementation planning, launching a multi-functional pilot team fast, and having a continuous improvement process. The need for extensive organisational analysis prior to implementation, for using team profiling techniques, early development of a new product strategy and investment in new technology have been understated by focus group participants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Coughlan P D, Voss C A 1992 Review of Practice and Issues in Simultaneous Engineering in the UK, London Business School, July (supported by SERC Grant References GR/G62400; GR/G63605)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Belson D and Nickelson D 1992 Measuring the economics of concurrent engineering. In CE & CALS Conference and Exposition, pp 539–549

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hartley J and Mortimer J 1990 Simultaneous Engineering: The Management Guide, Industrial Newsletters Ltd, Dunstable

    Google Scholar 

  4. Barton R J 1994 Concurrent Development of Radar Systems. In IEE Colloquium on Current Developments in Concurrent Engineering — Methodologies and Tools, (Digest Number 1994/140)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Computervision 1994 Concurrent Engineering: Winning the argument is just the beginning. Computer Aided Draughting and Design, pp 12–13

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ellis D 1992 Success at the drawing board. Infomatics, March, pp 47–54

    Google Scholar 

  7. Evans S, Lettice F E and Smart P 1994 Concurrent Engineering — Key Implementation Issues. In: Kidd P T, Karwowski W (eds) Advances in Agile Manufacturing, IOS Press

    Google Scholar 

  8. Manton S M 1991 Concurrent Engineering for the Land Rover Discovery. In: CALS Europe 91 Conference Proceedings, Part 2, pp 593–598

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nichols K 1994 Developing with the Best: Survey of product development within UK industry. World Class Design to Manufacture, 1(2): 7–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Benchmark Research 1994 The 1994 Manufacturing Attitudes Survey — Management Summary, Initiated by Computervision, Coventry

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bowden W and Lettice F 1996 Changing the Organisation Through People at Measurement Technology Ltd. In: Backhouse C J, Brookes N J (eds) Concurrent Engineering: What’s Working Where, Gower/Design Council, Aldershot, pp 149–162

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lettice F E 1995 Concurrent Engineering: A Team-Based Approach to Rapid Implementation, PhD Thesis, The CIM Institute, Cranfield University

    Google Scholar 

  13. Smart P K, Lettice F E and Evans S 1996 A UK Based Empirical Investigation of the Factors Contributing to a Successful Implementation of Concurrent Engineering. In:, Managing Integrated Manufacturing (MIM) Second International Conference, 26–28 June

    Google Scholar 

  14. Drayton J L, Fahad G A and Tynan A C 1989 The focus group: a controversial research technique. Graduate Management Research, pp 34–51

    Google Scholar 

  15. Krueger R A 1988 Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hoinville G and Jowell R 1978 Survey Research Practice, Heinemann Educational Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tull D S and Hawkins D I 1987 Marketing Research: Measurement and Method. MacMillan Publishing Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  18. Newman V 1994 The Creative Manager: A Toolbox for Problem Solvers, Cranfield University: The CIM Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Byrd J and Wood R T 1991 Implementation Strategies for Integrated Product Development In: CALS Europe 91 Conference Proceedings, Part 2, pp 549–560

    Google Scholar 

  20. Knodle M S 1991 Transitioning to a Concurrent Engineering environment, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, AIAA-91-3151

    Google Scholar 

  21. Smith P G and Reinertsen D G 1991 Developing Products in Half the Time., Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zangwill W I 1993 Lightning strategies for innovation: How the world’s best firms create new products, Lexington Books, MacMillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  23. Takeuchi H and Nonaka I 1986 The New New Product Development Game — Stop Running the Relay Race and Take Up Rugby. Harvard Business Review, January/February, pp 137–146

    Google Scholar 

  24. Costanzo L 1993 Breaking out is hard to do. Engineering, April, pp 25–26

    Google Scholar 

  25. Karandikar H M, Fotta M E, Lawson M, Wood R T 1993 Assessing Organisational Readiness for Implementing Concurrent Engineering Practices and Collaborative Technologies In: Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises, Morgantown, WV, pp 83–93

    Google Scholar 

  26. Carter D E and Baker B S 1992 Concurrent Engineering: The product development environment for the 1990s, Addison Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA

    Google Scholar 

  27. Belbin R M 1981 Management Teams: Why they succeed or fail, Heinemann, London

    Google Scholar 

  28. Charney C 1991 Time to Market — Reducing Product Lead Time, Society of Manufacturing Engineers, Dearborn, Michigan

    Google Scholar 

  29. Garrett R W 1990 Eight steps to Simultaneous Engineering. Manufacturing Engineering, Nov, pp 41–47

    Google Scholar 

  30. Booz, Allen and Hamilton 1982 New products management for the 1980s. Booz, Allen and Hamilton Inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

  31. Twigg D and Voss C A 1992 Managing Integration in CAD/CAM and Simultaneous Engineering — A Workbook, Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  32. McGrath M E, Anthony M T and Shapiro A R 1992 Product Development: Success through Product and Cycle-Time Excellence, Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wheelwright S C and Clark K B 1992 Revolutionizing Product Development: Quantum Leaps in Speed, Efficiency, and Quality, The Free Press, MacMillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  34. Clark K B and Fujimoto T 1991 Product Development Performance — Strategy, Organisation and Management in the World Auto Industry, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  35. Tucker D E and Leonard R 1994 Overcoming the Cultural Barriers to Implementing Concurrent Engineering. In: Kidd P T and Karwowski W (eds) Advances in Agile Manufacturing, IOS Press

    Google Scholar 

  36. Lettice F E, Smart P K and Evans S 1995 A Workbook-Based Methodology for implementing Concurrent Engineering. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Vol 16, pp 339–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lettice, F., Evans, S., Smart, P. (1998). Understanding the Concurrent Engineering Implementation Process — A Study Using Focus Groups. In: Duffy, A.H.B. (eds) The Design Productivity Debate. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1538-0_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1538-0_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-1540-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-1538-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics