Cultural Studies in Language Teaching. Culture and Language in a Network

Conference paper


The teaching of modern languages was deeply influenced by a classical paradigm: grammar and literature were at the core of language teaching. This was backed by a very simple argument: we study grammar in order to read the classical texts. The moment modern languages appeared on the curriculum, teachers started imitating the methodology of the respectable curriculum of Latin and Greek. The grammar-translation method was (and still is) a major methodology in language teaching. ‘High’ culture is at the core of this methodology. A classical education was considered the best training for a cultural elite “to control the twin excesses of grasping businessmen and unruly industrial proletarians” [1:21].


Popular Culture Language Teaching Mass Culture Literary Theory Communicative Approach 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Graff G. Professing Literature. An Institutional History. The University of Chicago Press, 1987Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hymes D. Foundations in Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Approach. University of Pennsylvania Press, 1974Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Habermas J. Theorie des kommunikativen Handeln. Suhrkamp, 1981Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    McNamara D. Subject Knowledge and its Application: Problems and Possibilities for Teacher Educators. Journal of Education for Teaching 1991; 17 (2): 113–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    McRae J. Literature with a small ‘1’. Macmillan Publishers, 1991Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Scholes R. Textual Power: Literary Theory and the Teaching of English. Yale University Press, 1985Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bloom A. The Closing of the American Mind. Simon & Schuster, New York, 1987Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Garafola L. The Last Intellectuals. New Left Review 1988; 169: 122–128Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hirsch ED. Cultural Literacy. What every American needs to know. With an Appendix: What Literate Americans Know. Vintage Books, New York, 1988Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bruner J. Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. MA Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1986Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Graff G. What Should We Be Teaching–When There is no `We’. The Yale Journal of Criticism 1988; 1 /2: 189–211Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Willinsky. New Literacy. Redefining Reading & Writing in the Schools. London: Routlegde, 1990Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Huddleston Edgerton S. Translating the Curriculum. Multiculturalism ito Cultural Studies. Routledge, 1997Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Goethals M. A Comprehensive “map” of Foreign Language Teacher Training. Locations for a Training Component towards Intercultural Competence. In: Aarup Jenssen A (ed) Intercultural Competence. A New Challenge for Language Teachers and Trainers in Europe. Aalborg University Press, 1995, pp 43–58Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fiedler LA. Literature as an Institution: The View from 1980. In: Fiedler A (ed) English Literature. Opening up the Canon. The John Hopkins University Press, 1979, pp 73–91Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Said E. Culture and Imperialism. Chatto & Windus. Vintage Edition, 1994.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lowenthal L. Literature, popular culture and society. Political Books Publishers, Palo Alto, 1968Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bennett T. Popular Fiction - Technology, Ideology. Production, Reading. Routledge, London, 1990Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Firth S. The Good, the Bad and the Indiferent: Defending Popular Culture from the Populists. Diacritics 1991; 102–115Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Clayton J. The pleasures of Babel: contemporary American literature and theory. Oxford University Press, New York, 1993Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gee W. Social Linguistics and Literacies. Taylor & Francis, 1996Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Anderson B. Imagined Communities.Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Verso, London, 1986Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Green A. Education, globalization and the Nation State. Macmillan Press Ltd., Houndmills, 1997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Negroponte N. Being Digital. Alfred A. Knopf, New York, 1995Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Guillory J. Canon, Syllabus, List: A Note on the Pedagogic Imagery. In: Sontag S, Atwan R (eds) Best American Essays. Ticknor & Fields, New York, 1992Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bizell P. Contact Zones and English Studies. College English 1994; 56: 2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pratt ML.Arts of the Contact Zone. Profession 91 1991; 33–40Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rorty R. Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge UP, Cambridge 1989Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Landow GP. Hypertext: The Convergence of Contemporary Critical Theory and Technology. Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, 1992Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lanham RA. The Electronic Word. The University of Chicago Press, 1993Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Soetaert R, van Belle G. Schermen met geletterdheid. In: Soetaert R, Top L (eds) Een beeld van belezenheid. Sdu-Uitgevers, Den Haag, 1996, pp 109–124Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Legouis E. A Short History of English Literature. Oxford University Press, 1965Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Soetaert R, Top L, van Belle G. Creating a New Borderland on the Screen. Educational Media International. The Official Quarterly Journal of the International Council for Educational Media 1995; 32 (2): 62–68Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Soetaert R, Top L, Eeckhout B Art and Literature in Environmental Education: two research projects. Environmental Education Research, 1996; 2 (1): 63–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tournier M. Vendredi ou les limbes du Pacifique. Gallimard, Paris, 1967Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Coetzee JM. Foe. Secker & Warburg, London, 1986Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Pratt ML. Linguistic Utopias. In: Fabb et al (eds) The Linguistics of Writing: Arguments Between Language and Literature. Manchester University Press, 1987, pp 48–66Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Fulton GD. Dialogue with other as potential and peril. Language and Literature 1994; 3 (1): 1–20Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Defoe D. The Life and Adventures of Robinson Crusoe. W. Norton and Company, New York/London, 1975.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Graff G. Beyond the Culture Wars. WW Norton Company, New York/ London, 1994Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Strauven F. Bouwen aan Documenta. Kunst & Cultuur 1997; 25Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Teacher TrainingUniversity of GhentGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations