Advertisement

C.A.L.L., Culture and the Language Curriculum: An Important Issue?

Conference paper

Abstract

There can be no doubt that computer-assisted language learning is a growth area. Since 1983, when I first became interested in C.A.L.L., and since 1990, when I founded the international journal, Computer Assisted Language Learning (Swets & Zeitlinger), all over the world more and more people are realising the potential of the computer in the teaching of languages and research into the domain is on the increase. Governments are beginning to take an interest in C.A.L.L. (cf. recent directives within the EEC, the creation of 24 CTIs in the UK, developments in Canada and the USA, etc.), and in information technology in general, as they see in the new technology a means of not only enhancing pedagogical effectiveness but also of teaching more students without an increase in the number of teachers. We as Callers ought to be wary of such pressures. C.A.L.L. is making sturdy and encouraging progress but there is still a need for more research and a healthy scepticism about C.A.L.L. as a method of instruction.

Keywords

Language Teaching Cultural Issue Language Teacher Cultural Element Computer Assisted Learning 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Information Technology Assisted Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. HEFCE Research Series, HEFCE: Bristol, July 1997, p 83Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kramsch C. Context and Culture in Language Teaching. OUP, 1992, p 1Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ibidem p 11Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ellis R. The Study of Second Language Acquisition. OUP, 1994, p 216Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ibidem p 516Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Larsen-Freeman D, Long MH. An Introduction to Second Language Acquistion. Longman, 1991, p 175Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ellis R. The Study of Second Language Acquisition. OUP, 1994, p 517Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ibidem p 240Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    E.g., ‘La Recherche d’un emploi’ and ‘L’acte de vente’. CAMILLE consortium, Clermont-Ferrand, Clé International, 1996Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pugh AC. CALL in Context: French Means Business. CALL 1997; 10 (3): 274–275MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brett P. Using Multimedia: An Investigation of Learners’ Attitudes. CALL 1996; 9 (2): 191–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chanier T. Learning an L2 for Specific Purposes Within a Hypermedia Framework. CALL 1996; 9 (1): 3–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Common European Framework of Reference for Language Teaching and Learning: Draft 1 of a Framework Proposal — Language Learning for European Citizenship. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 1996Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Borchardt F. Miscellany of Material for Structured Language Teaching, Learning, Training. Facultat de Traducció, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, 1996, p 59Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Levy M. Theory-driven CALL and the Development Process. CALL 1997; 10 (1): 41–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of FrenchUniversity of ExeterExeterUK

Personalised recommendations