Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Computer Supported Cooperative Work ((CSCW))

Abstract

CSCW systems are often designed and viewed from a technological point of view, where one is concerned with consistency, integrity and other properties. However, for many purposes, such global system properties are not relevant to the use of the system by users who are not concerned with the implementation, the state of the art of the technology, or the moment-to-moment state of remote systems of which they have no direct experience (except via the system itself). However, in CSCW we are, by definition, interested in systems from each user’s point of view, and this quite proper concern should be reflected in the technical system requirements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. There are technical advantages for this, such as reducing the bandwidth needed for multimedia CSCW.

    Google Scholar 

  2. The authors have often been asked, ‘How does the Internet work?’ Here, the questioners don’t mean, ‘What can I do with it?’ but rather a low-level question like, ‘How do I make it work to do what I want to do?’ Our answer is, ‘If the Internet worked, you wouldn’t need to know the answer.’ When people ask how the Internet works, they are asking questions that, for a telephone network, simply do not arise.

    Google Scholar 

  3. The attentive reader will notice M appearing in definitions of properties in the text that follows. This may give the impression that the definitions are not functional; always, however, M is subscripted by the user, which is an explicit parameter of the property. (M, unsubscripted, can be taken as a constant.)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Since we have ρ at our disposal, we could make the domains of the system and the user non-overlapping, then 0 is trivially generalized in this way. Moreover, we might want the domains of every user to be distinct, and this is achieved by different ρ for each user. Hence MuMv is a convenient (and correct) way to represent the joined models of two users.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Thimbleby, H., Pullinger, D. (1996). Observations on Practically Perfect CSCW. In: Dix, A.J., Beale, R. (eds) Remote Cooperation: CSCW Issues for Mobile and Teleworkers. Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1496-3_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1496-3_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-76035-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-1496-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics