User-oriented Index Design for Computer-based Documentation

  • Agnes Kukulska-Hulme

Abstract

The traditional way of approaching indexing is to take a document’s special-subject terms as the starting point. The problem with this is that the resulting retrieval aid (the ‘back-of-book’/‘back-of-manual’ index, or the thesaurus/synonym aid for computerised retrieval) is not conducive to knowledge transfer (learning) when the user of the documentation is not a specialist in the field in question. Nowadays, many users find themselves in this situation, and are obliged to learn as they go along, from on-line or printed manuals. In order to make computer documentation more accessible to users, we have to take their knowledge needs and use of language into consideration. This is a relatively new approach in information retrieval. In the past it has tended to focus on improving precision and recall, but a more recent trend is towards improving the searching experience for users (Duffy et al., 1989; Ingwersen, 1994), with an emphasis on language (Blair, 1990) and knowledge (Ahmad & Griffin, 1993). Research on computer-assisted technical writing also now addresses the problem of indexing (O’Brian Holt & Williams, 1992). It may be more appropriate to talk of ‘indexes’ rather than ‘indexing’ when the emphasis is on the result of the procedure, and when the possibility of different indexes is envisaged to suit different users.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahmad, K. and Griffin, S. (1993). Text Based Knowledge Acquisition: an exemplar case study. Computer Science Technical Report No. CS-93–02, University of Surrey.Google Scholar
  2. Blair, D. C. (1990). Language and Representation in Information Retrieval. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  3. Duffy, T. M., Mehlenbacher, B. and Palmer, J. (1989). ‘The Evaluation of Online Help Systems: A Conceptual Model’, in E. Barrett (ed.), The Society of Text, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  4. Emden, J. van (1990). A Handbook of Writing for Engineers. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  5. Hartley, J. (1985). Designing Instructional Text, 2nd edn. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  6. Kukulska-Hulme, A. (1992). ‘Terminological Cross-Mapping for a Sub-domain of Computing’. I.T.L. Review, 97–8, 187–204.Google Scholar
  7. Kukulska-Hulme, A. (1993a). ‘From Words, Through Rhetoric, To Knowledge Needs’, in K.-D. Schmitz (ed.), TKE’93 Terminology and Knowledge Engineering, Indeks Verlag, 420–7.Google Scholar
  8. Kukulska-Hulme, A. (1993b) Effective Knowledge Transfer: A Terminological Perspective - dismantling the jargon barrier to knowledge about computer security, (PhD Thesis.) Aston University.Google Scholar
  9. O’Brian Holt, P. and Williams, N. (eds) (1992). Computers and Writing - State of the Art. Oxford: Intellect.MATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Sides, C. (1984). How to Write Papers and Reports about Computer Technology. Philadelphia: ISI Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Agnes Kukulska-Hulme

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations