Skip to main content

A Fuzzy Thesaurus for Semantic Integration of Design Schemes

  • Conference paper
AI System Support for Conceptual Design

Abstract

Several designers should have to work together on the design of the same part of the real world. Maybe because of the extent of the work to be done, maybe to take into account knowledge from several designers, from several application domains: all these people do not perceive the real world in the same way. The integration goal is to obtain the richest view of the part of the real world under study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. R. Ahmed, P. De Smedt, W. Du, W. Kent, M. A. Ketabchi, W. A. Litwin, A. Rafii, and M. C. Shan. The pegasus heterogeneous multidatabase system. Computer, 24 (12): 19–27, December 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. C. Batini, M. Lenzerini, and S. Navathe. A comparative analysis of methodologies for database schema integration. ACM Computing Surveys, 18 (4), December 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Biskup and B. Convent. A formal view integration method. In International conference on the management of data, Washingtown, 28–30 May 1986. ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Bonjour and G. Falquet. Concept bases: a support to information systems integration. In Advanced information systems engineering: proceedings of the 6th international conference CAISE’94, June 6–10, 1994, volume 811 of Lecture Notes in Computer Sciences, pages 242–255. Springer Verlag, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Cavarero and E. Vittori. COD, un système de définition de classes d’objets. In Inforsid, Lille, France, Mai 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. Chaffin and D. J. Herrmann. The nature of semantic relations: a comparison of two approaches. In M. W Evens, editor, Relational models of the lexicons, pages 289–334. Cambridge university press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  7. I. Cornyn-Wattiau. L’intégration de vues dans le système SECSI. PhD thesis, Université Paris VI, France, Octobre 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. D. Cruse. Aspects of lexical relations. In premier séminaire de sémantique lexicale, pages 1–13, Toulouse, Janvier 1991. Université Paul Sabatier.

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. A. Cruse. Lexical semantics. Cambridge textbooks in linguistics. Cambridge university press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  10. U. Dayal and H. Hwang. View definition and generalization for database integration in multidatabase system. IEEE Transaction on software engineering SE, 10 (6), November 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Diet and F. H. Lochovsky. Interactive specification and integration of userviews using forms. In 8th international conference on entity-relationship approach, Toronto, 18–20 October 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. W. Evens. Relational models of the lexicon: introduction. In M. W Evens, editor. Relational models of the lexicons, pages 1–37. Cambridge university press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  13. P. Fankhauser, M. Kracker, and E. J. Neuhold. Semantic vs. structural resemblance of classes. Sigmod record, 20 (4): 59–63, December 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. G. Hirst. Semantic interpretation and the resolution of ambiguity. Cambridge University Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  15. H. C. Howard and D. R. Rehak. KADBASE interfacing expert systems with databases. IEEE Expert, 4: 65–76, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. M. A. Iris, B. E. Litowitz, and M. W. Evens. Problems of the part-whole relation. In M. W Evens, editor, Relational models of the lexicons, pages 261–288. Cambridge university press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  17. P. Johannesson. Schema transformations as an aid in view integration. In Advanced information systems engineering: proceedings of the 5th international conference CAISE’93, June 8–11, 1993, volume 685 of Lecture Notes in Computer Sciences, pages 71–92. Springer Verlag, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. V. Mannino and W. Effelsberg. Matching techniques in global schema design. In IEEE Compdec conference, Los Angeles, Californie, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  19. G. A. Miller, R. Beckwith, C. Fellbaum, D. Gross, and K. J. Miller. Introduction to wordnet: an on-line lexical database. International journal of lexicography, 3 (4): 235–244, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. A. Motro. Vague: a user interface to relational databases that permits vague queries. ACM transactions on office information systems, 6 (3): 187–214, July 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. S. Navathe, R. Elsmari, and J. Larson. Integrating user views in database design. In IEEE Computer, January 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  22. C. Parent and S. Spaccapietra. Intégration de vue et relativisme sémantique. In VI journées bases de données avancées, Montpellier, France, Septembre 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  23. J. C. Sager. A practical course in terminology processing. John Benjamins, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  24. P. Saint-Dizier. A denotational semantics for synonyms and opposites. In premier séminaire de sémantique lexicale, pages 70–75, Toulouse, Janvier 1991. Université Paul Sabatier.

    Google Scholar 

  25. A. P. Sheth and J. A. Larson. A tool for integrating conceptual schémas and user views. In 4th international conference on data engineering, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  26. P. Shoval and S. Zohn. Binary-relationship integration methodology. In Data and knowledge engineering. Elsevier science, North-Holland, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  27. G. Van Slype. Les langages d’indexation: conception, construction et utilisation dans les systèmes documentaires, les éditions d’organisation, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  28. W. W. Song, P. Johannesson, and J. A. Bubenko. Semantic similarity relations in schema integration. In Entity relationship approach, ER’92, 10th international conference on the entity relationship approach, volume 645 of Lecture Notes in Computer Sciences, pages 97–120. Springer Verlag, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  29. J. M. De Souza. SIS-a schema integration system. In BNDODJ conference, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  30. C. J. E. Thieme and A. P. J. M. Siebes. Schema refinement and schema integration in object-oriented databases. Technical Report CS-R9354, Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica, P. O. Box 4078, 1009 AB Amsterdam, The Netherlands, August 1993.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mirbel, I. (1996). A Fuzzy Thesaurus for Semantic Integration of Design Schemes. In: Sharpe, J.E.E. (eds) AI System Support for Conceptual Design. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1475-8_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1475-8_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-76000-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-1475-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics