Integrated Platform for AI Support of Complex Design (Part I): Rapid Development of Schemes from First Principles

  • R H Bracewell
  • R V Chaplin
  • P M Langdon
  • M Li
  • V K Oh
  • J E E Sharpe
  • X T Yan
Conference paper

Abstract

The engineering design process typically entails the construction of a description of an artefact that satisfies a formal (in most cases) functional specification, meets certain performance requirements and resource constraints; is realisable in a target technology; satisfies one or more criteria, for instance manufacturability, reliability, safety and testability; and, more recently, environmental friendliness. The common perception of engineering design is often taken as that of converting a need - expressed as an abstract concept in terms of general functionality - into a product fulfilling that need, and its process involving the mapping of a specified function onto a realisable physical structure - the designed product.

Keywords

Torque Assure Coupler Casing Refrigeration 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    French, M. J., Conceptual Design for Engineers, 2nd Ed, Design Council, London, 1985.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Rychener, M. D., (Ed), Expert Systems for Engineering Design, Academic Press, Boston, 1988.MATHGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Fischer, G., “Communication requirement for co-operative problem solving systems”, Journal of Information Systems, Vol 15, No. l, 1990, pp 21–36.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Oh, V., “Intelligent Design-Assistant Systems for Engineering Design”, Technical Report EDC 1993/02, Lancaster University, Lancaster, 1993.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Bracewell, R. H., Bradley, D. A., Chaplin, R. V., Langdon, P. M. and Sharpe, J. E. E., “Schemebuilder: A design aid for the conceptual stages of product design”, Proc 9th Int’l Confon Engineering Design ICED’93, The Hague, 1993, pp 1311–1318.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Bradley, D. A., Bracewell, R. H. and Chaplin, R. V., “Engineering design and mechatronics-the Schemebuilder project”, Research in Engineering Design, Vol 4, No 4, 1993, pp 241–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Paynter, H. M., Analysis and Design of Engineering Systems, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1961.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Karnopp, D. C., Margolis, D. L. and Rosenberg, R. C., System Dynamics: A Unified Approach, 2nd Ed., Wiley, Chichester, 1990.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Sharpe, J. E. E., “Bond graph synthesis of telechiries and robotics”, 3rd CISMIFFTOMM Conf on Robotics and Manipulators, Udine, Italy, 1978.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Finger, S. and Rinderle, J. R., “A transformational approach to mechanical design using a bond graph grammar”, Design Theory and Methodology-DTM’89, DE-Vol 17, W. H. Elmaraghy, (W. P. Seering and D. G. Ullman, Eds ), 1989, pp 107–115.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Ulrich, K. T. and Seering, W. P., “Synthesis of schematic descriptions in mechanical design”, Research in Engineering Design, Vol 1, No 1, 1989, pp 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Fishwick, P. A., “Qualitative methodology in simulation model engineering”, Simulation, Vol 52, 1989, pp 95–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Top, J. and Akkerman, H., “Computational and physical causality”, Proc 12th Int’l Conf on Artificial Intelligence, Sydney, 1991, pp 1171–1176.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Soderman, U. and Stromberg, J., “Combining qualitative and quantitative knowledge to generate models of physical systems”, Proc 12th Int’l Conf on Artificial Intelligence, Sydney, 1991, pp 1158–1163.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Bracewell, R. H. and Sharpe, J. E. E., “Application of bond graph methodology to concurrent conceptual design of interdisciplinary systems”, Conf IEEE Systems, Man and Cybernetics ’93, Le Touquet, Oct 1993.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Burr, J., “A theoretical approach to Mechatronics design”, PhD Thesis, Institute for Engineering Design, Technical University of Denmark, 1990.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Filman, R. E., “Reasoning with worlds and truth maintenance in a knowledge-based programming environment”, Communications of the ACM, Vol 31, No 4, 1988, pp 382–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Yourdon, E., Modern Structured Analysis, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1989Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Andreasen, M. M., “Syntesemetoder pa Systemgrundlag”, PhD Thesis, Lund Technical University, Lund, Sweden, 1980.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Sharpe, J. E. E., “Bond graph synthesis of telechirs and robots”, 3rd CISM IFFTOMM Conf on Robotics and Manipulators, Udine, Italy, 1978.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    Jensen, K. and Rozenberg, G., (Eds), High-level Petri Nets, Theory and Application, Springer-Verlag, 1991.MATHGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Ivy Team, SystemSpecs 2. 1 Reference Manual, IvyTeam, Zug, Switzerland, 1993.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • R H Bracewell
  • R V Chaplin
  • P M Langdon
  • M Li
  • V K Oh
  • J E E Sharpe
  • X T Yan

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations