Skip to main content

Abstract

Histopathologists are “more than machines into which one can feed coloured slides at one end and expect quality controlled answers to pour out at the other” (Wright 1975), but at the same time one must seek to avoid a Situation in which “pathological audit might be based on the frequency of irate clinicians looking for a better service” (Dudley 1975).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Barr WT (1978) Technical quality control in histopathology. J Clin Pathol 3 1: 996–998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barr WT, Williams ED (1982) Value of external quality assessment of the technical aspects of histopathology. J Clin Pathol 35: 1050–1056

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Black MM, Speer FD (1957) Nuclear structure in cancer tissues. Surg Gynecol Obstet 105: 97–102

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blenkinsopp WK, Stewart-Brown S, Blesovsky L, Kearney G, Fielding LP (1981) Histopathology reporting in large bowel cancer. J Clin Pathol 34: 509–513

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke RA (1984) Quality control in anatomic pathology: experience in Australia and New Zealand. Pathol Ann [Part 1]: 221–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Delides GS, Garas G, Georgouli G, Jiortziotis D, Lecca J, Liva T, Elomenoglou J (1982) Intralaboratory variations in the grading of breast carcinoma. Arch Pathol Lab Med 106: 126–128

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dudley HAF (1975) Audit and the pathologist. Proc Roy Soc Med 68: 634–637

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn FV (1980) Competence to practise and self-assessment. Bull Roy Coli Pathol 32: 16 – 18

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartveit F (1971) Prognostic typing in breast cancer. Br Med J 4: 253–257

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holman CDJ, James IR, Heenan PJ, Matz LR, Blackwell JB, Kelsall GRH, Singh A, Ten Seldam REJ (1982) An improved method of analysis of observer Variation between pathologists. Histopathology 6: 581–589

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Langley FA (1978) Quality control in histopathology and diagnostic cytology. Histopathology 2: 3–18

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Macartney JC, Henson DE, Codling BW (1981) Quality assurance in anatomic pathology. Am J Clin Pathol 75 [Suppl]: 467–475

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murthy MSN, Derman H (1981) Quality assurance in surgical pathology: personal and peer assessment. Am J Clin Pathol 75 [Suppl]: 462–466

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ooms EC, Anderson WA, Alons CL, Boon ME, Veldhuizen RW (1983) Analysis of the Performance of pathologists in the grading of bladder tumours. Hum Pathol 14: 144 – 150

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Owen DA, Tighe JR (1975) Quality evaluation in histopathology. Br Med J I: 149–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne CR, Stovin PG, Barker V, McVittie S, Stark JE (1979) Diagnostic accuracy of cytology and biopsy in primary bronchial carcinoma. Thorax 34: 294–299

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Penner DW (1973) Quality control and quality evaluation in histopathology and cytology. Pathol Ann 8: 1 – 19

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scarff RW, Torloni H (1968) Histological typing of breast tumours. (International histological Classification of tumours, No. 2 ). WHO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Silcocks PBS (1983) Measuring repeatability and validity of histological diagnosis—a brief review with some practical examples. J Clin Pathol 36: 1269–1275

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Silverberg SG (1976) Reproducibility of the mitosis count in the histologic diagnosis of smooth muscle tumours of the uterus. Hum Pathol 7: 451–454

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sissons HA (1978) On seeking a second opinion. J Clin Pathol 31: 1121 – 1124

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenkvist B, Westman-Naeser S, Vegelius J, Holmquist J, Nordin B, Bengtsson E, Eriksson O (1979) Analysis of reproducibility of grading systems for breast carcinoma. J Clin Pathol 32: 979–985

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Theodossi A, Skene AM, Portmann B, Knill-Jones RP, Patrick RS, Täte RA, Kealey W, Jarvis KJ, O’Brian DJ, Williams R (1980) Observer Variation in assessment of liver biopsies including analysis by kappa statistics. Gastroenterology 79: 232–241

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas GDH, Dixon MF, Smeeton NC, Williams NS (1983) Observer Variation in the histological grading of rectal carcinoma. J Clin Pathol 36: 385–391

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wright EA (1975) Quality control in histopathology. Proc R Soc Med 68: 619–622

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Underwood, J.C.E. (1987). Quality Assessment and Control. In: Introduction to Biopsy Interpretation and Surgical Pathology. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1473-4_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1473-4_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-17495-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-1473-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics