Advertisement

Combined Lymph Node Aspiration Cytology and Tumour Grade in Staging of Prostatic Cancer

  • L. Luciani
  • P. Scappini
  • G. L. Failoni
  • F. Piscioli

Abstract

The prognosis and treatment of prostatic cancer are strictly related to the status of the draining nodes. Imaging methods commonly employed in the study of the pelvic nodes do not allow exact knowledge of the presence or absence of metastatic deposits and therefore false positive and false negative results are often given. Histological examination of the nodes should be the procedure of choice, but the role of staging pelvic lymphadenectomy in the management of prostatic cancer is still controversial [1, 2].

Keywords

Prostatic Cancer Grade System Gleason Score Prostatic Carcinoma Prostatic Adenocarcinoma 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Olsson CA (1985) Staging lymphadenectomy should be an antecedent to treatment in localized prostatic cancer. Urology 25 (Suppl):4–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Paulson DF (1985) Staging lymphadenectomy should not be an antecedent to treatment in localized prostatic cancer. Urology 25 (Suppl):7–14PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gaeta JF, Asirwathman JE, Miller G, Murphy GP (1980) Histologic grading of primary prostatic cancer: a new approach to an old problem. J Urol 123:689–693PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gaeta JF (1981) Glandular profiles and cellular patterns in prostatic cancer grading. National Prostatic Cancer Project System. Urology 17 (Suppl):33–37PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gleason DF (1966) Classification of prostatic carcinomas. Cancer Chemother Rep 50:125–128PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gleason DF, Mellinger GT (1974) Veterans Administration Cooperative Urologic Research Group: prediction of prognosis for prostatic adenocarcinoma by combined histologic grading and clinical staging. J Urol 111:58–64PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gleason DF (1977) Histologic grading and clinical staging of prostatic carcinoma. In: Tannenbaum M (ed) Urologic pathology: the prostate. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, pp 171–197Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brawn PN, Ayala AG, Von Eschenbach AC, Hussey DM, Johnson DE (1982) Histologic grading study of prostate adenocarcinoma: the development of a new system and comparison to other methods. A preliminary study. Cancer 49:525–532PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Barzell W, Bean MA, Hilaris BS, Whitmore WF Jr (1977) Prostatic adenocarcinoma: relationship of grade and local extent to the pattern of metastases. J Urol 118:278–282PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kramer SA, Spahr J, Brendler CB, Glenn JF, Paulson DF (1980) Experience with Gleason’s histopathologic grading in prostatic cancer. J Urol 124:223–225PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Paulson DF, Piserchia PV, Gardner W (1980) Predictors of lymphatic spread in prostatic adenocarcinoma: Uro-Oncology Research Group Study. J Urol 123:697–699PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sagalowsky AI, Milam H, Revely LR, Silva FG (1982) Prediction of lymphatic metastases by Gleason histologic grading in prostatic cancer. J Urol 128:951–952PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zincke H, Farrow GM, Myers RP, Benson RC Jr, Furlow WL, Utz DC (1982) Relationship between grade and stage of adenocarcinoma of the prostate and regional pelvic lymph node metastases. J Urol 128:498–501PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Paulson DF (1982) Editorial comment. J Urol 128:501Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Parfitt HE Jr, Smith JA Jr, Gliedman JB, Middleton RG (1983) Accuracy of staging A1 carcinoma of the prostate. Cancer 51:2346–2350PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Guinan P, Talluri K, Nagubadi S, Sharifi R, Ray V, Shaw M (1983) Evaluation of Gleason classification system in prostate cancer. Urology 21:458–460PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Broders AC (1922) Epithelioma of the genito-urinary organs. Ann Surg 75:570–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Whitmore WF (1973) The natural history of prostatic cancer. Cancer 32:1104–1112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Byar DP (1983) Grading prostate cancer. Urology 22: 562 (letter)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Thomas R, Lewis RW, Sarma DP, Coker GB, Rao MK, Roberts JA (1982) Aid to accurate clinical staging. Histopathologic grading in prostatic cancer. J Urol 128:726–728PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Saltzstein SL, McLaughlin AP (1977) Clinico-pathologic features of unsuspected regional node metastases in prostatic adenocarcinoma. Cancer 40:1212–1215PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mostofi FL, Price EB Jr (1973) Tumors of the male genital system. In: Atlas of tumor pathology. Second Series, Fascicle 8. Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Washington DC, 218–223Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Myers RP, Neves RJ, Farrow GM, Utz DC (1982) Nuclear grading of prostatic adenocarcinoma: light microscopic correlation with disease progression. Prostate 3:423–432PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Epstein JJ, Berry SJ, Eggleston JC (1984) Nuclear roundness factor: a predictor of progression in untreated stage A2 prostate cancer. Cancer 54:666–671Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    ten Kate FJW, Gallee MPW, Schmitz PIM, Joebsis AC, van der Heul RO, Prins MEF, Blom JHM (1986) Problems in grading of prostatic carcinoma: interobserver reproducibility of five different grading systems. World J Urol 4:147–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rousselet MC, Saint-André JP, Six P, Soret JY (1986) Reproducibilité et valeur pronostique des grades histologiques de Gleason et de Gaeta dans les carcinomes de la prostate. Ann Urol 20:317–332Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wajsman Z (1981) Lymph node evolution in prostatic cancer. Is pelvic lymph node dissection necessary? Urology 17 (Suppl):80–82PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Piscioli F, Leonardi E, Reich A, Luciani L (1984) Percutaneous lymph node aspiration biopsy and tumor grade in staging of prostatic carcinoma. Prostate 5:459–468PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Luciani L, Scappini P, Pusiol T, Piscioli F (1985) Comparative study of lymphography and aspiration cytology in the staging of prostatic carcinoma. Urol Int 40:181–189PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Piscioli F, Scappini P, Luciani L (1985) Aspiration cytology in the staging of urologic cancer. Cancer 56:1173–1180PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. Luciani
  • P. Scappini
  • G. L. Failoni
  • F. Piscioli

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations