Lymph Node Aspiration Biopsy and Lymph Node Dissection in Prostatic Cancer

  • Z. Wajsman


A significant number of patients with localised prostatic cancer have regional lymph node metastases. The incidence of pelvic lymph node involvement is closely related to the stage and grade of the tumour. Donohue et al [1] have reviewed the recent literature and reported that 23% of patients with stage A2, 18% with stage B1, 35% with stage B2 and 46% with stage C disease have pathologically documented lymph node spread. Correlation of grading and lymph node metastasis was demonstrated by Kramer et al [2] when Gleason’s grading system was used. No lymph node involvement was found in patients with Gleason’s score 2, 3 or 4 in this study, nor in the study by Paulson et al [3] with the Urologic Oncology Group. However, the National Prostatic Cancer Project revealed a 30.5% incidence of lymph node invasion in low Gleason’s scores [4], On the other hand, most reports agree on the high incidence of lymph node metastases in patients with high-grade tumour.


Radical Prostatectomy Fine Needle Aspiration Localise Prostatic Cancer Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection Fine Needle Aspir 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Donohue RE, Mani JH, Whitecel JA, Mohr S, Scanavino D, Auspurger RR, Biber RJ, Fauver HE, Wetlaufer JN, Pfister RR (1980) Pelvic lymph node dissection: Guide to patient management in clinically locally confined adenocarcinoma of prostate. Urology 20:559–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kramer SA, Spahr J, Brendler C, Glenn J, Paulson D (1980) Experience with Gleason histopathological grading in prostate cancer. J Urol 124:223–225PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Paulson DF, Piserchia P, Gardner W (1980) Predictors of lymphatic spread in prostatic adenocarcinoma, Urologic-Oncology Research Group Study. J Urol 123:697–699PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wajsman Z (1981) Lymph node evaluation in prostatic cancer: is pelvic lymph node dissection necessary? Urology 17 (Suppl) 80–82PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Flocks RH (1973) The treatment of stage C prostatic cancer with special reference to combined surgical and radiation therapy. J Urol 109:461–463PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Catalona WG, Stein AG (1982) Accuracy of frozen section detection of lymph node metastases in prostatic carcinoma. J Urol 127:460–461PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Prout GR, Heaney JA, Griffin PP, Daly JJ, Shipley WU (1980) Nodal involvement as a prognostic indicator in patients with prostatic carcinoma. J Urol 124:226–231PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Berzell W, Bean MA, Hilaris BS, Whitemore WF Jr (1980) Prostatic adenocarcinoma: relationship of grade and local extent to the pattern of metastases. J Urol 118:278–282Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Myers RP, Zincke H, Fleming TR, Farrow GM, Furlow WL, Utz DC (1983) Hormonal treatment at time of radical retropubic prostatectomy for stage D1 prostatic cancer. J Urol 130:99–101PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Babcock YR, Grayhack YT (1979) Morbidity of pelvic lym-phadenectomy. Urology 13:483–486PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Freiha FS, Pistenma DA, Bagshaw MA (1979) Pelvic lym-phadenectomy for staging of prostatic carcinoma: is it always necessary? J Urol 122:176–177PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Catalona WG (ed) (1984) Prostate cancer. Grune and Stratton, Orlando, FloridaGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wajsman Z, Gamarra M, Park JJ, Beckley S, Pontes JE (1982) Transabdominal fine needle aspiration of retroperitoneal lymph nodes in staging of genitourinary tract cancer (correlation with lymphography and lymph node dissection findings). J Urol 128:1238–1240PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Paulson DF (1982) Editorial comments. J Urol 128:1240Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Z. Wajsman

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations