Skip to main content

Fitting the Workflow Management Facility into the Object Management Architecture

  • Conference paper
Business Object Design and Implementation II

Abstract

One of the major requirements for an OMG Workflow Management Facility is the definition of a workflow metamodel, which provides the model elements to construct workflow schemas. This paper proposes a layered logical architecture for workflow-management within the Object Management Architecture. In particular, the integration with the OMG Meta-Object Facility is taken into account.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American National Standard X3.138-1988: Information Resource Dictionary System; American National Standardization Institute, New York 1988

    Google Scholar 

  2. Attie P., Singh M., Sheth A., Rusinkiewicz M.: “Specifying and Enforcing Intertask Dependencies”, in: Proceedings of the 19 th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB), August 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bapat A. et al.: “The VORTEL Project”, De.Te.Berkom-Projekt Vorgangsbearbeitungs-Teleservice (VORTEL) — 6.Meilenstein: Final Report, The VORTEL consortium, Berlin 1996

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bernstein Ph.A.: “Middleware: A Model for Distributed System Services” in: Communications of the ACM, February 1996, Vol. 39, No.2, pp.86–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bußler C.: “Specifying Enterprise Processes with Workflow Modeling Languages”. In: Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications. Special Issue: Application of Enterprise Modelling Languages for Concurrent Engineering. Vol. 4, Nr. 3, September 1996

    Google Scholar 

  6. Böhm M., Deiters W., Friedrich M.; Lindert F.; Schulze W.: “Workflow Management as Teleservice”, in: The international Journal of Computer and Telecommmunications Networking, “Computer Networks and ISDN Systems”, Elsevier Publishing, 28 (1996), pp.1961–1969

    Google Scholar 

  7. Byrne B.: “IRDS Systems and Support for Present and Future CASE Technology” in: Proceedings ofCAiSE’96 DC, W4, Heraklion, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  8. Das S.; Kochut K.; Miller J.; Sheth A.; Worah D.: “ORBWork: A Reliable Distributed CORBA-based Workflow Enactment System for METEOR2”, Teclmical Report UGA-CS-TR-97-001, Department of Computer Science, University of Georgia, February 1997

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jablonski S.: “MOBILE: A Modular Workflow Model and Architecture”, in: Proceedings of the 4th International Working Conference on Dynamic Modelling and Information Systems, Noordwijkerhout, Netherlands, September 1994

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jablonski S., Bußler C.: “Workflow Management — Modeling Concepts, Architecture and Implementation”, International Thomson Publishing, Bonn, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  11. Krislmakumar N., Sheth A.: “Managing Heterogeneous Multi-system Tasks to Support Enterprise-wide Operations”, Technical Report TR-CS-94-002, LSDIS Lab, Department of Computer Science, University of Georgia, September 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Miller J.A, Palaniswami D., Sheth A., Kochut K., Singh H.: “WebWork: METEOR2’s Web-based Workflow Management System”, Technical Report UGACS-TR-97-002, University of Georgia, Department of Computer Science

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mittasch Ch., Irmscher K., Ziegert Th., Lodderstedt T., Müller S., Sommerfeld K.: „User Services in BPAFrame — a Framework for Workflow-Management-Systems“, IFIP World Computer Congress, Canberra, Sept. 1996, In: Terashima, N.; Altman, E. (Eds.): Advanced IT Tools, Chapman & Hall, S. 303–310, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  14. Object Management Group, “CORBAfacilities: Common Facilities Architecture”, Revision 4.0, November 1995

    Google Scholar 

  15. Object Management Group, „Object Management Architecture Guide“, Third Edition, June 13, 1995, R.M. Soley (ed.), John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  16. Object Management Group, „Object Collection Service“, second revised version, OMG-Document orbos/96-05-05, adopted October 30th, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  17. Object Management Group, “Workflow Facility RFP”, Revised Draft approved by Workflow Workgroup on March 14th, 1997, OMG Document cf/97-03-14

    Google Scholar 

  18. Object Management Group, “Joint Meta-Object Facility Proposal”, Proposal to the CFTF RFP-5 by Unisys, IBM, Oracle, SSA and ICL, January 14th, 1997, OMG Documents cf/97-01-13 to cf/97-01-19

    Google Scholar 

  19. Object Management Group, “Towards an OMG-style Workflow Facility”, Presentation by Wolfgang Schulze to the Common Facilities Task Force, OMG Technical Meeting, Tampa, January 14th, 1997, OMG Document cf/97-01-22

    Google Scholar 

  20. Object Management Group, “Workflow Management Facility RFP”, issued on May 9th, 1997, OMG Document cf/97-05-06

    Google Scholar 

  21. Schill A.; Mittasch Ch.; “Workflow Management Systems on Top of OSF DCE and OMG CORBA” in: Distributed Systems Engineering Journal, December 1996

    Google Scholar 

  22. Schulze W.; Böhm M.; Meyer-Wegener K.; “Services of Workflow Objects and Workflow Meta-Objects in OMG-compliant Environments”, OOPSLA’96, Workshop on Business Object Design and Implementation, San José, CA, October 6th, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  23. Schulze W.: „Objektorientierte Implementierungstechniken für Workflow-Management-Systeme in OMA-konformen Architekturen“ in: Workflow-Management: Entwicklung von Anwendungen und Systemen, Editors: Jablonski S, Böhm M., Schulze W., dpunkt-Verlag Heidelberg, 1997, (in German)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sheth A., Kochut K., Miller J., Worah D., Das S., Lin C., Palaniswami D., Lynch J., Shevchenko I.: “Supporting State-wide Immunization Tracking using Multi-Paradigm Workflow Technology” in: Proceedings of the 22nd Inti. Conf. on Very Large Databases (VLDB96), September 1996, also available as Technical Report UGA-CS-TR-96-001, Department of Computer Science, University of Georgia

    Google Scholar 

  25. Weise D.: “Verwaltung von Vorgangstypen in einem Repository als Basisdienst einer objekt-und dienstorientierten Workflow-Architektur”, Master’s thesis (Diplomarbeit) at the Dresden University of Technology, October 31 st, 1996, (in German)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wodtke D., Weissenfels J., Weikwn G., Kotz-Dittrich A.: „The Mentor Project: Steps Towards Enterprise-Wide Workflow Management“, Proceedings of the 12th IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  27. Workflow Management Coalition: “Workflow Facility Specification”, Document Nunber WFMC-TC-21 01, Working Draft, November 1st, 1996

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Schulze, W. (1998). Fitting the Workflow Management Facility into the Object Management Architecture. In: Patel, D., Sutherland, J., Miller, J. (eds) Business Object Design and Implementation II. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1286-0_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1286-0_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-108-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-1286-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics