Cellular Automata Approaches for Simulating Rheology of Complex Geological Phenomena
Cellular Automata (CA) permit sometime an alternative method to differential equations for modelling and simulating some kind of complex systems, which can be described in terms of local interactions of their constituent parts. Typical application fields of CA are microscopic physical phenomena with elementary automata, which have few states and a simple transition function.
We extended the application range to two macroscopic geological phenomena, very similar from a fluid-dynamical viewpoint: lava flows and debris/mud flows, which can be viewed as dynamical systems based on local interactions. In this paper a unifying approach for both phenomena is presented, considering the main features of SCIARA and SCIDDICA, the two cellular models, developed for simulating respectively lava flows and debris flows. Examples of practical applications on real events are shown: the case of an eruption that occurred in Reunion Island (Indian Ocean) in 1986 and the 1984 Ontake volcano debris avalanche in Japan. General considerations are deduced from the particular types of applications in order to infer an empirical method to be extended to other macroscopic cases.
KeywordsDebris Flow Cellular Automaton Lava Flow Cellular Automaton Cellular Automaton Model
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Toffoli T. Cellular Automata as an alternative to (rather than an approximation of) differential equations in modeling physics. Physica 1OD 1984; 117–127Google Scholar
- 3.Johnson A.M. Physical Processes in Geology. Freeman, Cooper & Company, San Francisco CA., 1973Google Scholar
- 5.Rongo R., Spataro W., Villenueve N. Lava flow simulation with SCIARA: the Reunion Island case. To appear in the Proceedings of IAMG 98 Conference, Ischia Island, Italy, 5–9 October 1998Google Scholar
- 6.Barca D. Crisci G.M., Di Gregorio S. et al. Cellular Automata methods for modeling lava flow: simulation of the 1986–1987 Etnean eruption. In: Active Franas. UCL Press London, Kilburn C. and Luongo G. Eds. 1993, 12: 283–301Google Scholar
- 8.Crisci G. M., Di Francia A., Di Gregorio S., et al. SCIARA.2: A Cellular Automata Model For Lava Flow Simulation. In: Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference of the International Association for Mathematical Geology IAMG 22–27 September 1997. Glahn Ed. V.P., 1997, pp 11–16 (Add.)Google Scholar
- 9.Sassa K. Motion of Landslides and Debris Flows. Report for Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research by Japanese Ministry on Education, Science and Culture (Project No 61480062), 1998Google Scholar
- 10.Di Gregorio S., Nicoletta F.P., Rongo R. et al. A two-dimensional Cellular Automata Model for Landslide Simulation. In: Proceedings of 6th Joint EPSAPS International Conference on Physics Computing “PC’94”, Lugano, Switzerland 22–26 August 1994. Ed.s R.Gruber and M.Tommasini, 1994a, pp. 523–526Google Scholar
- 11.Di Gregorio S., Nicoletta F.P., Rongo R et al. Landslide Simulation by Cellular Automata in a Parallel Environment. In: Proceedings of 2nd International Workshop on Massive Parallelism: Hardware, Software and Application October 3–7 1994 Capri Italy. 1994b, pp 392–407Google Scholar
- 12.Di Gregorio S., Nicoletta F.P., Rongo R. et al. SCIDDICA-3: A Cellular Automata Model for Landslide Simulation. In: Advances in Intelligent Systems. IOS Press Amsterdam, F.C. Morabito ed. 1997, pp. 324–330Google Scholar