Behaviour programmable machines for field construction operations

  • Jonathan O’Brien
Conference paper

Abstract

This paper presents a unified theory of construction activity and processes based on the idea of programmable physical action units and modules. The theory covers both animate and inanimate construction systems and the paper gives examples of its use to model dynamic systems comprised of active agents. The model in also used in conjunction with a complementary theory — namely that of spatially programmable functional operators — to model construction operations. The paper also examines the requirements for cognitive systems that might be used to affect field tasks. An idea for a single, universal, cognitive-box that can support all forms of smart field-robotic machinery systems is presented.

Keywords

Europe Tungsten Explosive Drilling Compaction 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [Ashby 1960]
    W. Ross Ashby. Design for a Brain. 2nd edition. Science Paperbacks 1960MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. [Bridgeman]
    Percy Bridgeman. The Logic of Modern Physics. New York, MacMillan, 1927.Google Scholar
  3. [EB 1958]
    Automatic machines. In Encyclopaedia Britannica 1958 edition Vol. 2 page 786B — especially figure 5. See also sections in Mark’s and Kemp’s Mechanical Engineering Handbooks.Google Scholar
  4. [EB-CD97]
    Control Theory. In Encyclopaedia Britannica Compact disk version 1997.Google Scholar
  5. [ISARC 1983–97]
    See for example the data base comprised of the 14 years Proceedings of the Annual Symposiums of the International Association for Automation and Robotics in Construction (IAARC). See also IAARC on the Internet ftp://www.iaarc.org
  6. [Freeman and Newell 1971]
    P. Freeman and Allan. Newell. A model for functional reasoning in design. In Proceedings of the Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. London, September 1971, The British Computer Society.Google Scholar
  7. [Newell and Simon 1972]
    Allan Newell and Herbert Simon. Human Problem Solving. Prentice Hall 1972.Google Scholar
  8. [O’Brien and Compton 1987]
    Jonathan O’Brien and Richard Compton. Field Studies of the Cognitive Processes involved in Construction Activity. In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Robotics and Artificial Intelligence in Building Construction, pages 322–342, Building Research Station, Technion, Haifa Israel, June 22–25 1987.Google Scholar
  9. [O’Brien 1995a]
    Jonathan O’Brien. Large Scale, Computer-Controlled, Manipulators For Field Based Applications. In Proceedings of the 26th International Symposium on Industrial Robotics (ISIR) pages 79–84. Singapore, October 4–6 1995.Google Scholar
  10. [O’Brien 1995b]
    Jonathan O’Brien. System Deployment Structures — A New General Form Of Robotic Construction Agent. In Proceedings of the I2th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (ISARC) pages 9–17. Warsaw, Poland, May 30-June 1 1995. Eds Budny E, McCrea, A and Szymanski K., IMBiGS Publishers.Google Scholar
  11. [O’Brien 1995c]
    Jonathan O’Brien. Development Of A High Fidelity, Real Time, Robotics Systems Simulator for Complex Site and Services Applications. In Proceedings 1st International Workshop on Service Robotics, pages 53–61. Sydney, May 1995. International Advanced Robotics Programme, Australian Robot Association.Google Scholar
  12. [O’Brien 1994]
    Jonathan O’Brien. Robotic Action-Heads — New forms of device for attachment to existing construction machines In Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction, pages 690–700 Brighton, England, May 24–26, ed B. Chamberlain, Elsevier, 1994.Google Scholar
  13. [Seward et al 1971]
    Derek Seward et al., Controlling an intelligent excavator for autonomous digging in difficult ground, in Proceedings of the 9 th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction, pages 743–750, Tokyo, June 1992, Japan Industrial Robot Association.Google Scholar
  14. Unimation Inc. (1970) Programmed Manipulator Apparatus, The Patent Office, London, Patent No. 1307611, 1970.Google Scholar
  15. [Wakefied et al 1997]
    Ronald Wakefield, Jirawat Damrianant and Jonathan O’Brien. A Petri Net Based System for the Modeling and Computer Simulation of Automated Construction Operations. In Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction, Pittsburgh, USA, June, 1997, Carnegie Mellon University.Google Scholar
  16. [Winter and O’Brien 1996]
    Robert Winter and Jonathan O’Brien. Self Programming Construction Machines in Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction, pages 635–644, Tokyo, June, 1996, Japan Robot Association.Google Scholar
  17. [Winter et al 1995]
    Robert Winter, Jonathan O’Brien and Ron Wakefield. A New Schema for the Engineering Design of Autonomous Agents in Non-Manufacturing Domains. Industrial and Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Expert Systems: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference. Pages 21–26, Melbourne, June 6–9, 1995. Gordon and Breach pubs. Eds Forsyth G. F and Moonis A.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jonathan O’Brien
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of New South WalesSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations